Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 06379-01
Original file (06379-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY

BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD

S

2 NAVY ANNE

X

WASHINGTON DC 20370-510

0

CRS
Docket No: 6379-01
7 December 2001

This is in reference to your application for correction of your
naval record pursuant to the provisions of Title 10, United
States Code, Section 1552.
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval
Records, sitting in executive session, considered your
Your allegations of error and
application on 5 December 2001.
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative
regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of
Board.
your application, together with all material submitted in support
thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations
and policies.
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire
record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was
insufficient to establish the existence of probable material
Grror or injustice.
The Board found that you enlisted in the Navy on 19 June 1990 at
The record reflects that you received two nonjudicial
age 20.
punishments.
controlled substance and an unspecified period of unauthorized
absence.
On 11 September 1991 the commanding officer recommended that you
be separated with an other than honorable discharge by reason of
misconduct due to drug abuse.
recommendation, you elected to waive the right to present your
After review by the
case to an administrative discharge board.
discharge authority, the recommendation for separation was
approved and you were discharged with an other than honorable
discharge on 11 October 1991.
In its review of your application the Board carefully weighed all
potentially mitigating factors,
and the contention that a sexual assault caused your misconduct.
However, the Board concluded that these factors were not

The offenses included use and possession of a

When informed of the

such as your youth and immaturity

The names and votes of the members

Accordingly, your

Further, the record contains no evidence of

sufficient to warrant recharacterization of your discharge, given
your drug abuse.
sexual assault and you have presented none.
application has been denied.
of the panel will be furnished upon request.
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that
favorable action cannot be taken.
You are entitled to have the
Board reconsider its 
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board.
In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that a
presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval
record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the
existence of probable material error or injustice.

dec,ision  upon submission of new and material

Sincerely,

W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director



Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 03196-09

    Original file (03196-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 9 March 2010. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. The Board, in its review of your entire record and application, carefully weighed all potentially mitigating factors, such as your youth, post...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR6361 14

    Original file (NR6361 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. in addition, the Board considered its previous review of your case in November Log. On_30 April 1992, the Assistant Secretary—of the Navy (Manpower and Reserve Affairs) approved the recommendations of the BOI and BOR and directed separation under other than honorable conditions by reason...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR844 14

    Original file (NR844 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire ; record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Subsequently, -after waiving your procedural rights in June 1991, your commanding officer recommended discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due commission of a serious offense as evidenced by sexual misconduct. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 09396-08

    Original file (09396-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 4 August 2009. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. On 7 June 1991, administrative discharge action was initiated to separate you by reason of misconduct due to drug abuse.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR12070 14

    Original file (NR12070 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 17 March 2015.. Asa result, you were processed for an administrative separation by reason of misconduct due to drug under other ‘than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to drug abuse, which was in direct Gisregard to the Navy's ‘Zero Tolerance’ Policy, and conviction by civil authorities for possession of marijuana. Consequently, when applying for a...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR12070 14_Redacted

    Original file (NR12070 14_Redacted.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 17 March 2015. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. The Board, in its review of your entire record and application with supporting documentation, carefully weighed all potentially mitigating factors,...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 06724-10

    Original file (06724-10.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 19 April 2011. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and polileies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 03039-01

    Original file (03039-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 28 November 2001. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In this regard,...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 07333-09

    Original file (07333-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 8 June 2010. Your allegations of error and injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with ali material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 07333-09

    Original file (07333-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 8 June 2010. Your allegations of error and injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with ali material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and...