Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 06260-99
Original file (06260-99.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved
DEPARTMENT OF
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF

 

THE 

NAVY

  NAVAL RECORDS

2 NAVY ANNEX

WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100

TRG
Docket No: 6260-99
16 June 2000

Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records
Secretary of the Navy

RECORD  OF,

(a) Title‘10 U.S.C. 1552

(1) DD Form 149 w/attachments

_ (2) Case Summary

(3) Subject's naval record

From:
To:

Subj:

Ref:

Encl:

Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a

1.
former enlisted member of the United States Marine Corps
filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting a better
characterization of service than the general discharge issued on
26 May 1983.

The Board, consisting of Mr.  

2.
Exnicios, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and
injustice on 7 June 2000 and, pursuant to its regulations,
determined that the corrective action indicated below should be
taken on the available evidence of record.
considered by the Board consisted of the enclosures, naval
records, and applicable statutes,

regulations and policies.

Carlson, Mr. Neuschafer and Mr.

Documentary material

The Board, having reviewed all the facts of record pertaining

3.
to Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice, finds as
follows:

a.

Before applying to this Board, Petitioner exhausted all

administrative remedies available under existing law and
regulations within the Department of the Navy.

b.

Although it appears that enclosure (1) was not filed in

a timely manner, it is in the interest of justice to waive the
statute of limitations and review the application on its merits.

Petitioner enlisted in the Marine Corps on 6 November

His record indicates that on 13 January  

zt age 18.
73" tall and weighed 236 pounds.

1981 
was 
1983 he was counseled concerning substandard performance.
On 7
April 1983 he received nonjudicial punishment for an unauthorized
absence of about three and a half hours.
a reduction in rate to PVT (E-l).
later he was
counseled concerning a pattern of unsatisfactory performance
was offered assistance in
"redeveloping his weight control
program."

On 11 March and 28 March

The punishment included

Seven days 

1983.he

and

d.

Subsequently, Petitioner was processed for discharge by

reason of unsatisfactory performance.
discharge authority directed a general discharge.
his weight was 234 pounds.
was being assigned an RE-3P reenlistment code due to his failure
He received the general discharge on
to meet weight standards.
26 May 1983.

On 18 May 1983
That same day he acknowledged that he

On 16 May 1983 the

.

Petitioner states in his application that he was unable

coztrol his weight because of an undiagnosed thyroid problem

to 
and that after his discharge he was prescribed medication and has
been able to keep his weight under control.

f.

Petitioner's record is incomplete in that it shows that
he was only assigned conduct and proficiency marks of 4.2 and 4.0
on 2 June 1982 and no marks after that date.
These marks are
high enough to support an honorable characterization of service.
The Board is aware that the conduct and proficiency marks are one
of the factors to be considered in cases such as this.
of 4.0 in conduct and 3.0 in proficiency are high enough to
warrant an honorable characterization of service.

Averages

CONCLUSION:

The Board notes that Petitioner's counseling for

Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record the
Board concludes that Petitioner's request warrants favorable
action.
unsatisfactory performance appear to relate primarily to his
failure to meet the weight standards and that the only other
derogatory entry is the nonjudicial punishment for a short period
of unauthorized absence.
conduct and proficiency mark record.
he may have had an undiagnosed medical problem, the Board
concludes that a characterization of service based on his
inability to meet weight standards is no longer appropriate and
the discharge should now be recharacterized to honorable.
is especially so given his satisfactory conduct and proficiency
averages.

The Board also notes the incomplete

Given the possibility that

This

RECOMMENDATION:

That Petitioner's naval record be corrected to show that

a.
on 26 May 1983 he was issued an honorable discharge by reason of
unsatisfactory performance vice the general discharge now of
record.

That this Report   of Proceedings be filed in Petitioner's

b.
naval record.

4.

It is certified that a quorum was present at the Board's

2

and that the foregoing is a true and
review and deliberations,
complete record of the Board's proceedings in the above entitled
matter.

ROBERT D. 
Recorder

ZSALMAN

ee
ALAN E. GOLDSMITH
Acting Recorder

Pursuant to the delegation of authority set out in Section
5.
6(e) of the revised Procedures of the Board for Correction of
Naval Records (32 Code of Federal Regulations, Section
and having assured compliance with its provisions, it is hereby
announced that the foregoing corrective action, taken under the
has been approved by the Board on
authoritv of reference (a),
behalf of the Secretary

of-the Navy.

 

723.6(e))

i

.

-

 

DEAN PFEIFFER

w
Executive Director



Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 06452-10

    Original file (06452-10.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a former enlisted member of the Marine Corps, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting recharacterization of his general discharge from active duty. The Board, consisting of Mr. Blanchard, Mr. Sproul, and Mr. Genteman, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 12 April 2011 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06344-01

    Original file (06344-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Petitioner enlisted in the Marine Corps on 18 June 1981 at the age of 18. d. During the period from 24 March 1982 to 11 May 1983, Petitioner was assigned to a weight control/personal appearance program on four occasions. That Petitioner's naval record be corrected to show that he was honorably discharged on 17 September 1984 vice issued the general discharge under honorable conditions on the same day. That any material directed to be removed from Petitioner's naval record be returned to...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 11221-06

    Original file (11221-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The reenlistment code was properly assigned and was based on his overall service record.A review of his service record indicates that he was counseled concerning failure to be at his appointed place of duty; drunk driving; underage drinking; breaking restrictions; disobedience of orders; not being recommended for promotion; failure to comply with current Marine Corps weight standards; and3poor performance while assigned to the Battalion weight control program. The service record entry dated...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR2851 13

    Original file (NR2851 13.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a former enlisted member of the Marine Corps, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting an upgrade of his general characterization of service received on 15 November 1996. The Board, consisting of Mr. Grover, Ms. Aldrich, and Mr. Zsalman, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 8 April 2014 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available...

  • USMC | DRB | 2000_Marine | MD00-01074

    Original file (MD00-01074.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    MD00-01074 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review, received 000920, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to honorable. Chronological Listing of Significant Service Events :980420: Applicant's weight does not meet acceptable Marine Corps standards. 980629: Commanding officer recommended honorable discharge for the convenience of the government due to a personality disorder, based upon a diagnosed personality disorder as evidenced by...

  • USMC | DRB | 2000_Marine | MD00-00668

    Original file (MD00-00668.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    I had a problem with weight control, and was discharged because of it.To begin with, I had a weight problem when I went into the Marine Corps, and had to go on a delayed enlistment program to give me time to loose some weight. I request that you look into this situation and assist in getting the discharge upgraded, so that I may receive my VA Education Assistance benefit.your assistance Documentation In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 01685-10

    Original file (01685-10.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Before applying to this Board, Petitioner exhausted all administrative remedies which were available under existing law and regulations within the Department of the Navy. CONCLUSION: Upon reviq@w and consideration of all the evidence of record, the Board finds the existence of an error and injustice warranting upgrading Petitioner's general discharge to an honorable characterization of service. The Board particularly notes that he had no disciplinary action and his proficiency and conduct...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 05249-08

    Original file (05249-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 TUR Docket No: 5249-08 11 February 2009 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Subj: REVIEW NAVAL RECORD ORM Ref: (a) 10 U.S.C. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a former enlisted member of the Marine Corps, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting that the characterization of her discharge be changed. Based on the...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 06278-10

    Original file (06278-10.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a Former enlisted member of the Marine Corps, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting that the general characterization of his discharge of 28 October 1993 be changed. On 19 October 1993 the discharge authority directed separation with a characterization of service warranted by the service record. The Board's finding is based on his length of service and periodic conduct marks.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 01796-11

    Original file (01796-11.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 SJN Docket No: 01796-1411 9 November 2011 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records Le Secretary of the Navy Sib): aaa RBA, RECORD OF Ue, Ref: (a) 10 U.S.C, 1552 Encl: (1) DD Form 149 with attachments (2) Case Summary (3) Subject's naval record 1. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a former enlisted member of the Marine Corps, filed enclosure {1) with this...