Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 05957-01
Original file (05957-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY

BOARD FOR CORRECTION

 

OFNAVAL RECORD

S

2 NAVY ANNE

X

WASHINGTON DC 20370-510

0

CRS
Docket No: 5957-01
18 October 2001

Dear

This is in reference to your application for correction of your
naval record pursuant to the provisions of Title 10, United
States Code, Section 1552.
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval
Records, sitting in executive session, considered your
application on 17 October 2001.
Your allegations of error and
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative
regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this
Board.
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of
your application, together with all material submitted in support
thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations
and policies.

After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire
record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was
insufficient to establish the existence of probable material
error or injustice.

The Board found that you enlisted in the Naval Reserve on 27 June
1974 and reported to active duty on the same day.
reflects that you received three nonjudicial punishments and were
convicted by a special court-martial.
assault and battery,
on two occasions,
lawful order,

use of provoking words, failure to obey a
and absence from your appointed place of duty.

disobedience of a lawful order, disrespect

The offenses included

The record

On 23 March 1976 the commanding officer recommended that you be
separated with a general discharge by reason of unfitness.
informed of the recommendation,
present the case to an administrative discharge board.
review by the discharge authority,
separation was approved and you were discharged with a general
discharge on   15 April 1976.

When
you elected to waive the right to

the recommendation for

After

In its review of your application the Board carefully weighed all
potentially mitigating factors,
were told that the discharge would be honorable.

such as the contention tht you
However, the

Board concluded that these factors were not sufficient to warrant
recharacterization of your discharge, given your record of
frequent involvement with military authorities.
the Board noted that you were the subject of four disciplinary
actions within a period of less than two years.
is no evidence in your record that you were informed that the
discharge would be honorable.
concluded that no change to the discharge is warranted.
Accordingly, your application has been denied.
votes of the members of the panel will be furnished upon request.

Based on the foregoing, the Board

The names and

In this regard,

Further, there

It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that
favorable action cannot be taken.
You are entitled to have the
Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board.
In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that a
presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval
record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the
existence of probable material error or injustice.

Sincerely,

W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director

2



Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 08602-00

    Original file (08602-00.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 24 July 2001. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of Board. The Board also The Board found that these factors were not sufficient to warrant recharacterization of your discharge given your record of misconduct and especially...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 04600-01

    Original file (04600-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 17 October 2001. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Board found that these factors were not sufficient to warrant recharacterization of your discharge given your request for discharge to avoid trial for unauthorized absences and disobedience, and your three prior...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 01963-01

    Original file (01963-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    You were sentenced to confinement at hard labor for two months, forfeitures of $240 per month for two months, reduction in rank to PVT (E-l), and a bad conduct discharge. the foregoing factors and contention were insufficient to warrant recharacterization of your discharge given your record of two NJPs and a special court-martial conviction. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 03442-01

    Original file (03442-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    .- This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of Title 10, United States Code, Section 1552. considered your application on Your allegations of error and injustice were A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Navy Records, sitting in executive session, 3 October 2001. reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. On 19 December 1975 you waived the...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 02989-01

    Original file (02989-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 16 October 2001. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently,...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 02849-01

    Original file (02849-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 3 October 2001. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Subsequently, you received three more nonjudicial The offenses included unauthorized absences You received the bad conduct discharge on 22 However, the Board concluded that these factors were In its review of your...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 03202-01

    Original file (03202-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of Title 10, United States Code, Section 1552. considered your application on Your allegations of error and injustice were A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Navy Records, sitting in executive session, 3 October 2001. reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. discharge authority approved the request...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 03024-01

    Original file (03024-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 18 October 1977 you submitted a written request for an other than honorable discharge in order to avoid trial by court-martial for unauthorized absences totalling 119 days. factors were not sufficient to warrant recharacterization of your discharge given your request for discharge to avoid trial for unauthorized absences of about four months and your two prior nonjudicial punishments. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 07295-00

    Original file (07295-00.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 19 September 2001. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. not sufficient to warrant recharacterization of your discharge due to the fact that your unauthorized absences totalled more You received the bad conduct discharge The court sentenced you to xordingly, your application...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 05874-01

    Original file (05874-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 5 December 2001. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. these factors were not sufficient to warrant recharacterization The record reflects that you received four nonjudicial The offenses included unauthorized absences You received the bad conduct discharge on 24...