DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD
S
1
2 NAVY ANNE
X
WASHINGTON DC 20370.510
0
CRS
Docket No: 5645-01
20 November 2001
This is in reference to your application for correction of your
naval record pursuant to the provisions of Title 10, United
States Code, Section 1552.
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval
Records, sitting in executive session, considered your
application on 20 November 2001.
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative
regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this
Board.
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of
your application, together with all material submitted in support
thereof,, y our naval record and applicable statutes, regulations
and policies.
Your allegations of error and
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire
record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was
insufficient to establish the existence of probable material
error or injustice.
totalling 74 days, missing movement, use of provoking
The Board found that you enlisted in the Navy on 8 August 1950 at
age 20.
The record reflects that you received four nonjudicial
punishments and were convicted by two summary courts-martial and
three special courts-martial.
absences
words, and drinking an alcoholic beverage while on duty.
On 18 June 1953 the commanding officer recommended that you be
separated with an undesirable discharge by reason of unfitness.
After review by the discharge authority, the recommendation for
separation was approved and you received an undesirable on 21
July 1953.
The offenses included unauthorized
In its review of your application the Board carefully weighed all
potentially mitigating factors,
immaturity.
not sufficient to warrant recharacterization of your discharge,
given your record of frequent involvement with military
authorities.
However, the Board concluded that these factors were
In this regard, the Board noted that you were the
such as your youth and
subject of nine disciplinary actions within a period of less than
totalling more
three years, which included unauthorized absences
than two months.
that no change to the discharge is warranted.
application has been denied.
of the panel will be furnished upon request.
Accordingly, your
The names and votes of the members
Based on the foregoing, the Board concluded
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that
favorable action cannot be taken.
You are entitled to have the
Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board.
In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that a
presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval
record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the
existence of probable material error or injustice.
Sincerely,
W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director
2
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 03224-01
material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, considered your application on Documentary regulations and policies. (UA) totaling about 9 days, two brief In December 1953, you were notified that you were being recommended for discharge by reason of unfitness. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 04999-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, application on 4 December 2002. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted your husband's naval record and applicable Your allegations of error and considered your After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06601-00
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 4 April 2001. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of Board. On 1 December 1953 he pled guilty to issuing On 27 August The court sentenced him to confinement The court deferred On 26 February 1954 a board of officers...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR00266 13
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 16 October 2013. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2000 | 06703-00
A three—member panel for the Board for Correction of Navy Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 16 May 2001. The record reflects that you were advanced to SA (E-2) and received the Korean Service Medal for service on board USS JUNEAU (CLkA-119) from 5 September to 17 October 1952. On 18 June 1954 the commanding officer recommended discharge by reason of unfitness and stated that on 7 June 1954 an administrative discharge board (ADB) had thoroughly reviewed...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 06003-05
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 08350-07
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. An administrative discharge board met on 6 January 1954 and recommended an undesirable discharge. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 07113-08
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 17 December 2008. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 08354-07
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.You enlisted in the Navy on 28 October 1953 at age 17. After review, the discharge authority...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 02073-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your Your allegations of error and application on 20 November 2001. injustice were regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of Board. authority, the recommendation for separation was approved and you were discharged with an undesirable discharge on 29 September 1961. these factors were not sufficient to...