DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD
S
2 NAVY ANNE
X
WASHiNGTON
DC 20370-510
0
CRS
Docket No: 5231-01
18 October 2001
Dear
This is in reference to your application for correction of your
naval record pursuant to the provisions of Title 10, United
States Code, Section 1552.
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval
Records, sitting in executive session, considered your
application on 17 October 2001.
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative
regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this
Board.
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of
your application, together with all material submitted in support
thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations
and policies.
Your allegations of error and
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire
record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was
insufficient to establish the existence of probable material
error or injustice.
On 15 August 1998 you submitted to an accession
The Board found that you enlisted in the Navy on 14 August 1998
at age 18.
urinalysis that tested positive for marijuana.
the commanding officer directed your separation.
on 27 August 1998 you received an entry level separation by
reason of erroneous enlistment due to drug abuse.
you were assigned a reenlistment code of RE-4.
At the time
On 21 August 1998
Subsequently,
The Board noted that applicable regulations require the
assignment of an RE-4 reenlistment code to individuals who are
separated due to erroneous enlistment based on preservice use of
drugs.
injustice in your reenlistment code.
application has been denied.
of the panel will be furnished upon request.
The Board thus concluded that there is no error or
The names and votes of the members
Accordingly, your
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that
favorable action cannot be taken.
You are entitled to have the
Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board.
In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that a
presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval
record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the
existence of probable material error or injustice.
Sincerely,
W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director
-
2
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 07008-00
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 3 April 2001. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. on the urinalysis you were processed for an administrative separation by reason of erroneous enlistment due to drug abuse. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 00954-01
A three-member panel for the Board for Correction of Navy Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 6 June 2001. injustice were reviewed in accordance with adm'inistrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of Your allegations of error and mzterial submitted in support After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 02921-07
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 5 February 2008. As a result, on 4 September 1998, you were notified of pending administrative separation action by reason of erroneous enlistment due to drug abuse. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 05792-01
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. separated under similar circumstances, the Board could find no error or injustice in your assigned reenlistment code. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 03411-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 16 October 2001. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Therefore, the Board Regulations allow for the assignment of an RE-4 reenlistment code when an individual is separated by reason of erroneous enlistment, and such a code is normally assigned when the underlying reason...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 04703-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 17 October 2001. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Subsequently, on 18 April 1996 you At the time you were assigned a On 12 April 1996 the commanding officer On 3 The Board thus concluded that there is no error or The Board noted that applicable regulations require...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 09398-07
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.On 13 March 2001, you enlisted in the Navy at age 18. On 5 April 2001, the separation authority...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 05493-03
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 13 August 2003. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is existence of probable on the applicant to demonstrate...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 05255-01
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. The Board found that you enlisted in the Navy on 24 September 1998 at age 21. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 01148-01
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 ELP Docket No. 1148-01 28 June 2001 Dea r