Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 04361-01
Original file (04361-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY

BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD

S

2 NAVY ANNE

X

WASHINGTON DC 20370-510

0

ELP
Docket No. 4361-01
12 October 2001

From:
To:

Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records
Secretary of the Navy

Subj:

REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD OF

Ref:

(a) 10 U.S.C.1552

Encl:

(1) DD Form 149 w/attachments
(2) Case Summary
(3) Subject's Naval Record

1.

Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a

former enlisted member of the Navy, applied to this Board
requesting, in effect, that his reenlistment code be changed.

The Board, consisting of Messrs. Ensley, Lippolis, and Shy

2.
reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on
11 October 2001 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined
that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on
the available evidence of record.
considered by the Board consisted of the enclosures, naval
records, and applicable statutes,

regulations and policies'.

Documentary material

The Board, having reviewed all the facts of record

3.
pertaining to Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice
finds as follows:

a .

Before applying to this Board, Petitioner exhausted all

administrative remedies available
regulations within the Department

under existing law and
of the Navy.

b.

Petitioner's application

timely manner.

to the Board was filed in a

C .

Petitioner enlisted in the Navy on 28 August'1996 for

The record reflects that he served without incident

four years.
until 22 December 1997 when he received nonjudicial punishment
for an unspecified period of unauthorized absence, failure to
obey a lawful order, and drinking on duty.

Punishment imposed

consisted of 45 days of restriction and extra duties, and
forfeitures of one half of one 'month's pay for two months.
restriction and forfeitures,
suspended.

with the exception of $50, were

The

d.

Petitioner continued to serve without further incident,
and extended his enlistment for seven

was advanced to GM3 (E-4),
months.

e.

On 7 February 2001, the  USS CUSHING   transferred

Petitioner to the Transient Personnel Unit at Puget Sound, WA
for separation processing.
Record submitted upon transfer recommended Petitioner for both
retention and promotion.
Petitioner requested and was granted
terminal leave from 15 February to 27 March 2001.

The Evaluation Report and Counseling

f.

On 27 March 2001, Petitioner was honorably released

from active duty, transferred to the Naval Reserve and assigned
an RE-4 reenlistment code.
reenlistment code, and means that he is not recommended for
reenlistment.

That code is the least favorable

CONCLUSION:

In this regard,

Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record,
Board concludes that Petitioner's request warrants favorable
action.
the Board notes Petitioner had only
disciplinary action for relatively minor offenses in more than
four years of active service.
advanced to GM3, served without incident, and was recommended
for both reenlistment and retention.
Petitioner was granted terminal leave eight days after his
arrival at the TPU, for a period that carried him to the
expiration of his enlistment as extended.
no basis for the assignment of the most restrictive RE-4
reenlistment code, and the Board believes it was assigned in
error.
appropriate and just to change the reenlistment code to RE-1.

Accordingly, the Board concludes that it would be

The Board notes that

The record contains

Subsequent to that action, he was

the

one

RECOMMENDATION:

a.

the RE-4 reenlistment code,

That Petitioner's naval record be corrected by changing
assigned on 27 March 2001, to RE-1.

b.

That a copy of the Report of Proceedings be filed in

Petitioner's naval record.

2

It is certified that a quorum was present at the Board's

4.
review and deliberations, and that the foregoing is a true and
complete record of the Board's proceedings in the above entitled
matter.

ROBERT D.  
Recorder

ZSALMAN

ALAN E. GOLDSMITH
Acting Recorder

Pursuant to the delegation of authority set out in Section 6

5.
(e) of the revised Procedures of the Board for Correction of
Naval Records (32 Code of Federal Regulations, Section 723.6
(e)) and having assured compliance with its provisions, it is
hereby announced that the foregoing corrective action, taken
under the authority of reference (a),
Board on behalf of the Secretary of the Navy.

has been approved by the

Executive Dir

3



Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 05048-01

    Original file (05048-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The Board finds it a strange that an individual is RECOMMENDATION: That Petitioner's naval record be corrected by changing the RE-4 reenlistment code, assigned on 9 October 1991, to RE-3R. That Petitioner's record be further corrected by "not recommended for reenlistment" from the removing the entry enlisted performance record (page 9). 6(e) of the revised Procedures of the Board for Correction of Naval Records (32 Code of Federal Regulations, Section 723.6(e)) and having assured...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 02740-01

    Original file (02740-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    2740-01 24 August 2001 From: To: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records Secretary of the Navy Subj: REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD OF #.&,a Ref: (a) 10 U.S.C.1552 Encl: (1) DD Form 149 w/attachments (2) Case Summary (3) Subject's Naval Record Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a 1. former enlisted member of the Navy, applied to this Board requesting, in effect, that his naval record be corrected by changing the discharge under other than honorable conditions and RE-4...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 00825-01

    Original file (00825-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel for the Board for Correction of Navy Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 20 June 2001. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 05382-01

    Original file (05382-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    5382-01 14 December 2001 From: To: Subj: Ref: Encl: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records Secretary of the Navy REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD OF (a) 10 U.S.C.1552 (1) DD Form 149 w/attachments (2) Case Summary (3) Subject's Naval Record Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a 1. former enlisted member of the Navy, applied to this Board requesting, in effect, that her reenlistment code be changed.. "must promote" and She was advanced to YN2 on Her next evaluation report...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 03354-02

    Original file (03354-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    1552 (1) DD Form 149 w/attachments (2) Case Summary (3) Subject's naval record The Board, consisting of Messrs. Zsalman, Pfeiffer, and Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a 1. former enlisted member of the Navy, applied to this Board requesting that his reenlistment code be changed. Punishment imposed was forfeitures paygrade E-2, and The restriction and extra f& two months, reduction to Petitioner served without .1990 for d. On 8 October 1994, Petitioner received NJP...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 07384-01

    Original file (07384-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Punishment imposed was forfeitures of $100 and 10 days e. Petitioner then continued to serve without further However, on 19 November incident, receiving two performance evaluations, that assigned a satisfactory overall rating of 3.4. That Petitioner's naval record be corrected by changing the RE-4 reenlistment code, 3R. 6(e) of the revised Procedures of the Board for Correction of Naval Records (32 Code of Federal Regulations, Section 723.6(e)) and having assured compliance with its...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 06318-01

    Original file (06318-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    6318-01 7 December 2001 From: To: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records Secretary of the Navy Subj: REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD OF Ref: (a) 10 U.S.C.1552 Encl: (1) DD Form 149 w/attachments (2) Case Summary (3) Subject's Naval Record Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a 1. former enlisted member of the Navy, applied to this Board requesting, in effect, that her reenlistment code be changed. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Dunn, Milner and Pauling 2. reviewed...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 01025-01

    Original file (01025-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    1025-01 28 June 2001 From: To: < Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records Secretary of the Navy Subj: REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD OF Ref: (a) 10 U.S.C.1552 Encl: (1) DD Form 149 w/attachments (2) Case Summary (3) Subject's Naval Record Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a 1. former enlisted member of the Navy, applied to this Board requesting, in effect, that her reenlistment code be changed. Her overall f. Regulations authorize the assignment of an RE-3B or RE-4...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 00451-05

    Original file (00451-05.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a former enlisted member of the Navy, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting that his reenlistment code be changed. In order to receive an RE-3R reenlistment code, a Sailor must be recommended for advancement or be promotable. Based on the foregoing, the Board concludes that Petitioner’s record does not warrant the worst reenlistment code of RE-4, and that code should be changed to RE-3R.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 04352-01

    Original file (04352-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL 2 NAVY ANNE X WASHINGTON DC 20370-510 RECORD S 0 TRG Docket No: 4352-01 16 October 2001 Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records Secretary of the Navy RECORD OF (a) Title 10 U.S.C. In the performance evaluation for the d. On 25 April 1995, Petitioner requested a hardship discharge stating, in part, as follows: . The Board further concludes that this Report of Proceedings 2 should be filed in Petitioner's naval record so...