Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 04265-00
Original file (04265-00.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY

BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS

2 NAVY ANNEX

WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100

JR E
Docket No: 
10 July 2001

4265-00

This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the
provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552.

A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive
session, considered your application on 28 June 2001.
Your allegations of error and injustice
were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the
proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your
application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and
applicable statutes, regulations and policies.

After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the
evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or
injustice.

The Board found that you were discharged from the Naval Reserve on 1 August 1986, by
reason of physical disability, with entitlement to disability severance pay. You were awarded
a 10% rating for a back condition. On 14 November 1988, the Department of Veterans
Affairs (VA) advised you that it had rated your back condition at 
20%, and denied service 
connection for a psychiatric disorder. On 14 June 1990, the rating for your back condition
was increased to 
Veterans Appeals denied your request for secondary service connection for a psychiatric
disorder; however, on 28 October 1998, rating officials at VA regional office awarded you
service connection and 

30%, effective from 9 February 1987. On 24 May 1994, the Board of

’

a,70% rating for depression, effective from 17 August 1994.

Board noted that the military departments assign disability ratings only to those

The 
conditions which render a service member unfit to perform the duties of his or her office,
grade, rate or rating, and that assigned ratings are fixed as of the date of separation or
permanent retirement. The VA, however, rates any condition it classifies as service
connected, i.e., incurred in, aggravated by, or traceable to a period of military service,  or

\.

derived from a service connected condition. Ratings are not fixed, and may be raised,
lowered or added throughout a veteran ’s life time, as circumstances warrant.The Board was
not persuaded that you suffered from an unfitting mental disorder when discharged from the
Naval Reserve on 1 August 1986, or that your back condition was ratable at or above 30%
disabling at that time. The unfortunate deterioration in your health which occurred following
your discharge is matter within the purview of the VA, rather than the Department of the
Navy. Accordingly, there is no basis for recommending any corrective action in your case,
and your application has been denied. The names and votes of the members of the panel will
be furnished upon request.

‘ It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that favorable action cannot be
taken. You are entitled to have the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new
and material evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board. In this
regard, it is important to keep in mind that a presumption of regularity attaches to all official
records. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the
burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or
injustice.

Sincerely,

W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director



Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 02290-01

    Original file (02290-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 7 February 2002. Unlike the VA, the military departments are permitted to assign disability ratings only in those cases where the service member has been found unfit for duty. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 05877-07

    Original file (05877-07.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 12 June 2008. The increase in severity of your back condition which occurred during the years following your discharge is a matter under the purview of the VA, rather than the Department of the Navy, as the VA may adjust and add disability ratings throughout a veteran’s lifetime, whereas rating determinations made by the military departments are fixed as of the...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 07496-00

    Original file (07496-00.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 24 May 2001. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. The combined rating was increased to 30% on 18 October 1996, and made effective from 10 August 1994. i The Board noted that in order to be entitled to...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 04023-01

    Original file (04023-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 7 February 2002. The military departments are permitted to rate only those conditions which render a service member unfit for duty. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 02336-00

    Original file (02336-00.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    You were evaluated by a Navy psychiatrist on 11 March 1997, and reported that you felt the Paxil was helping and that you were feeling much better. The increase was based on a report of treatment dated 30 November 1998, and a VA rating examination conducted on 4 May 1999, which indicated your depressive symptoms had increased in severity The Board noted that in order to qualify for disability separation or retirement from the Armed Forces, a service member must be found unfit to perform the...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 04188-00

    Original file (04188-00.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The disc condition was rated on a presumptive basis, i.e., it was diagnosed and found to be 10% or more disabling within one year of your discharge from the Navy. The Board noted that the military departments rate only those conditions which render a member unfit to perform the duties of his office, grade, rank or rating at the time of his separation or retirement, whereas the VA rates any condition it classifies as “service connected”. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 01599-03

    Original file (01599-03.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. The fact that the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) awarded you service connection and a substantial disability rating for posttraumatic stress disorder effective 4 August 1995 is not probative of the existence of error in your naval record. Consequently, when applying for a correction of...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 05642-05

    Original file (05642-05.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of you application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, you naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, ‘the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.The Board found that you served on active duty in the Marine Corps from 6 June 1967 to 29 December...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 00651-09

    Original file (00651-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The VA st for service connection for three other ugh you had numerous minor conditions that did jidual compensable ratings, VA rating officials he combination of those minimal disabilities ed you with an unspecified “employment arranted a combined overall rating of 10%. Ther as increased to 40% effective 2 December 1998, ive 30 August 2006. compensable disability rating on 9 March 1995 ate the existence of error or injustice in your this regard, the Board noted that the VA ing without...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 05913-00

    Original file (05913-00.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. The military departments may assign disability ratings only in those cases where the service fixed as of the date of separation or permanent member has been found unfit to perform the duties of his office, grade, rank or rating by reason of physical disability, and ratings are retirement. ...