Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 04038-01
Original file (04038-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY

BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD

S

2 NAVY ANNE

X

WASHINGTON DC 20370-510

0

TJR
Docket No: 4038-01
21 November 2001

*,

Dear

This is in reference to your application for correction of your
naval record pursuant to the provisions of Title 10, United
States Code, Section 1552.

A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval
Records, sitting in executive session, considered your
application on 14 November 2001.
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative
regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this
Board.
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of
your application, together with all material submitted in support
and applicable statutes, regulations,
thereof, your naval record,
and policies.

Your allegations of error and

After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire
record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient
to establish the existence of probable material error or
injustice.

The Board found you enlisted in the Marine Corps on 13 July 1970
at the age of 18.

Your record contains a Naval Drug Rehabilitation Center report
dated 14 June 1972, in which you were recommended for an
administrative separation due to your unwillingness to cooperate
in a drug rehabilitation therapy program as evidenced by your
voluntary disclosure that you had continued to use heroin,
barbiturates, marijuana, amphetamines, and lysergic acid
diethylamide (LSD).
notified of pending administrative separation action by reason of
unfitness due to drug abuse.
to 
administrative discharge board,
the discharge.
recommended you be discharged under other than honorable
conditions by reason of unfitness due to drug abuse as evidenced
by your disclosure of continued drug use and failure to
participate in a rehabilitation program.
discharge authority approved the commanding officer's

consul.t with legal counsel, present your case to an

Subsequently, on 9 August 1972, you were

On 18 August 1972 the

At that time you waived your rights

On 16 August 1972 your commanding officer

or submit a letter of rebuttal to

However, the Board concluded these factors and

recommendation and directed an other than honorable discharge by
On 22 August 1972 you were so discharged.
reason of unfitness.
The Board, in its review of your entire record and application,
carefully weighed all potentially mitigating factors, such as
your youth and immaturity, post service conduct, and your
contention that your record has been expunged of all disciplinary
infractions.
contention were not sufficient to warrant recharacterization of
your discharge because   of your failure to participate in a drug
treatment rehabilitation program,
after enrollment in that program.
there is no evidence in the record, and you submitted none, to
support your contention that your record had been expunged of
your misconduct.
exemption to enter the rehabilitation program, and no
disciplinary action was taken for the drug use which preceded the
exemption.
which occurred after you entered into the rehabilitation program.
Given all the circumstances of your case, the Board concluded
your discharge was proper as issued and no change is warranted.
Accordingly, your application has been denied.

However, the exemption did not cover the drug use

and your continued use of drugs
Further, the Board noted that

The Board noted that you were granted a drug

The names and votes of the members of the panel will be furnished
upon request.

It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that
You are entitled to have the
favorable action cannot be taken.
Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board.
In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that a
presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval
record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the
existence of probable material error or injustice.

Sincerely,

W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director

2



Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 02500-09

    Original file (02500-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your ‘application on 12 January 2010. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with ali material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, - and policies. Nevertheless, the Board found that these factors were not sufficient to warrant a change in your characterization of service given your two...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 12499 11

    Original file (12499 11.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 2 October 2012. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 08442-08

    Original file (08442-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. The Board also considered your belief that you received a general discharge because of an unauthorized absence. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 05134-06

    Original file (05134-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.You enlisted in the Marine Corps on 26 October 1971 at age 17. The Naval Drug Rehabilitation...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2000_Navy | ND00-00102

    Original file (ND00-00102.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Decision A documentary discharge review was conducted in Washington, D.C. on 000727. 910215: Drug and Alcohol Abuse Report: Self-referral 22Aug90, marijuana abuse, 4-7 times per week, ashore off duty. In accordance with OPNAVINST 5350.4A, the lowest discharge characterization the applicant could receive, as a participant in the Navy’s Alcohol and Drug Abuse self-referral program, is General.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 07224-06

    Original file (07224-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record 1 the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.You enlisted in the Navy on 27 January 1971 at age 19. After review, the discharge authority...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2004 Marine | MD04-01205

    Original file (MD04-01205.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requests the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable. Necessary corrective actions explained, sources of assistance provided, disciplinary and discharge warning issued.030203: Applicant notified of intended recommendation for discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to drug abuse and alcohol rehabilitation failure as evidenced by “your involvement in illegal in-service usage of a controlled...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR2474-13

    Original file (NR2474-13.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 25 February 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. ‘Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 02697-02

    Original file (02697-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 21 August 2002. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. paygrade E-l, 45 days of restriction and extra 18, The punishment imposed was a On 23 March 1976 you were screened for drug use and admitted that between February 1972 until February 1976 that you used marijuana daily,...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06149-01

    Original file (06149-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 5 February 2002. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of Board. The first notes the 12 May 1984 NJP and your On 7 December 1984 you were notified of pending administrative separation action by reason of misconduct due to drug...