DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD
X
2 NAVY ANNE
S
WASHINGTON DC 20370.510
0
CRS
Docket No: 2798-01
16 August 2001
Your allegations of error and
This is in reference to your application for correction of your
naval record pursuant to the provisions of Title 10, United
States Code, Section 1552.
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval
Records, sitting in executive session, considered your
application on 15 August 2001.
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative
regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this
Board.
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of
your application, together with all material submitted in support
thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations
and policies.
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire
record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was
insufficient to establish the existence of probable material
error or injustice.
The Board found that you enlisted in the Navy on 12 May 1997 at
age 20.
On 13 May 1997 you submitted to an accession urinalysis
that tested positive for marijuana.
commanding officer directed your separation.
Subsequently, on 27
May 1997 you received an entry level separation by reason of
erroneous enlistment due to drug abuse.
assigned a reenlistment code of RE-4.
The Board noted that applicable regulations require the
assignment of an RE-4 reenlistment code to individuals who are
separated due to erroneous enlistment based on preservice use of
drugs.
injustice in your reenlistment code.
application has been denied.
of the panel will be furnished upon request.
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that
favorable action cannot be taken.
Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
The Board thus concluded that there is no error or
Accordingly, your
The names and votes of the members
On 21 May 1997 the
At that time you were
You are entitled to have the
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board.
In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that a
presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval
record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the
existence of probable material error or injustice.
Sincerely,
W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director
2
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 07008-00
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 3 April 2001. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. on the urinalysis you were processed for an administrative separation by reason of erroneous enlistment due to drug abuse. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 06206-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 9 January 2002. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. The Board noted that applicable regulations require the assignment of an RE-4 reenlistment code to individuals who are separated due to erroneous enlistment based on preservice use of drugs. Consequently, when applying...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 09267-07
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 13 November 2008. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 00069-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 26 June 2001. Regulations allow for the assignment of an RE-3J reenlistment code when an individual in an entry level status tests positive for marijuana use, served less than 30 days in the DEP, confessed to the use of marijuana during the moment of truth, and was processed for separation by reason of fraudulent enlistment. Consequently, when applying for a...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06144-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 5 February 2002. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. than others separated from the Navy for that reason, the Board could not find an error or injustice in the assignment of the 4 reenlistment code. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record,...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 07230-01
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 09398-07
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.On 13 March 2001, you enlisted in the Navy at age 18. On 5 April 2001, the separation authority...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 04957-01
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support and applicable statutes, regulations, thereof, your naval record, and policies. You waived the right to respond to the On 6 June 2001 you were separated from the Navy with an uncharacterized entry level separation by reason of defective enlistment and induction/erroneous enlistment due to drug abuse, and were assigned an RE-4 reenlistment code. The Board concluded...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 04328-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 26 September 2001. The Board noted that applicable regulations require the assignment of an RE-4 reehlistment code to individuals who are separated due to erroneous enlistment based on preservice use of drugs. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 07591-01
The Board noted that an RE-4 reenlistment code is authorized by regulatory guidance and is often assigned to an individual separated due to a diagnosed personality disorder. The Board thus concluded that there is no error or injustice in your reenlistment code. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.