Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 02548-00
Original file (02548-00.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY

BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF

 

NA\‘AL  RECORD

S

2 NAVY ANNE

X

WASHINGTON DC 20370.510

0

CRS
Docket No: 2548-00
11 June 2001

._

Your allegations of error and

Dear 
This is in reference to your application for correction of your
naval record pursuant to the provisions of Title 10, United
States Code, Section 1552.
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval
Records, sitting in executive session, considered your
application on 30 May 2001.
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative
regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this
Documentary material considered by the-Board consisted of
Board.
your application, together with all material submitted in support
thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations
and policies.
After careful and conscientious  
consid.eration  of the entire
record, the Board found that the 
evide:nce submitted was
insufficient to establish the existence of probable material
error or injustice.
The Board found that you enlisted in the Navy on 13 October 1976
A special court-martial convened on 28 June 1978 and
at age 19.
you were found guilty of unauthorized absences totalling seven
days, absence from your appointed place of duty on 15 occasions,
and willful disobedience of a lawful order on two occasions.
court sentenced you to confinement at hard labor for two months.
on 12 July 1978, found that
A psychiatric evaluation, conducted 
you had a personality disorder and 
rec:ommended your separation.
Subsequently, on 7 November 1978 you received nonjudicial
punishment (NJP) for unauthorized absences totalling 26 days.
The punishment imposed consisted of a forfeiture of $243,
restriction for 
While your record does not contain the separation processing
documents, it appears that the commanding officer recommended
that you be separated with a general discharge by reason of
The
unsuitability due to a diagnosed personality disorder.
record clearly shows that you were discharged on 8 November 1978

30 days, and reduction in rate.

The

.

The Board found that no change to the sentence should

However, you have

with a general discharge by reason of unsuitability due to a
personality disorder.
Concerning your request for removal of the special court-martial,
re.viewing the findings of a
the Board is prohibited by law from 
court-martial and must restrict its 
re:view to determine if the
sentence of the court-martial should be reduced as a matter of
clemency.
be made.
Concerning your request for the removal of the 7 November 1978
NJP, the Board noted your contentions.
submitted no evidence, and the record contains none, to support
In the absence
the contention that your NJP should be removed.
of such evidence, the Board presumed that your commanding officer
Accordingly,
did not abuse his discretion in imposing the NJP.
the Board concluded that your NJP was not unjust.
Your Privacy Act requests concerning changes to your medical
record should be addressed to the Bureau of Medicine and Surgery,
2300 E Street, N.W., Washington, D.C., 20372-5300.
Accordingly, your application has been denied.
votes of the members of the panel will. be furnished upon request.
It is regretted that the circumstance:; of your case are such that
favorable action cannot be taken.
Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence or other matter not 
In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that a
presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval
record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the
existence of probable material error or injustice.

You are entitled to have the
previous1.y  considered by the Board.

The names and

Sincerely,

W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director

2



Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 04912-02

    Original file (04912-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 14 November 2002. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. It was recommended that you be processed On 8 May 1978 you received a On 2 June 1978 you were notified that separation action was being initiated by reason of unsuitability due to your diagnosed personality disorder. ...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 08479-01

    Original file (08479-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 7 May 2002. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. circumstances in your case the Board concluded your discharge was proper as issued and no change is warranted.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 04952-02

    Original file (04952-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 14 November 2002. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. 1980 you were convicted by a special court martial for unauthorized absence from 16 June to 13 November 1979, a period of 150 days; failure to go to your appointed place of duty and missing ship's movement. were...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 04465-01

    Original file (04465-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 27 November 2001. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of Board. The record does not indicate if any disciplinary action was taken for this period of UA. good post service conduct, and your However, the Board concluded these...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 08125-01

    Original file (08125-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 21 May 2002. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. On 12 April 1973 you received NJP for two periods of absence from your appointed place of duty, disobedience, and a five day period of UA. November 1976, you submitted a written request for an undesirable discharge in order...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 06503-09

    Original file (06503-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. However, this recommendation was changed to general under honorable conditions by reason of unsuitability solely because of your psychiatric diagnosis of a character disorder. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 05971-01

    Original file (05971-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) denied your request for recharacterization of your discharge on 4 September 1985. court-martialed on your 21st birthday to make an example out of you, the discharge was unjust, and that your pay record was lost from 1978 to 1979. foregoing factors and contentions were insufficient to warrant recharacterization of your discharge given your record of four NJPs and a special court-martial conviction. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 00387-06

    Original file (00387-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.The Board found that you enlisted in the Marine Corps on 19 February 1976. Although the request...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 03978-01

    Original file (03978-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 14 November 2001. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 07803-01

    Original file (07803-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    10, United A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 14 May 2002. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of Board. August and again on 15 December 1978 you received NJP for nine periods of absence from your appointed place of duty. convicted by summary court-martial...