DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
C T ION OF NAVAL RECORD
BOARD FOR CORRE
S
2 NAVY ANNE
X
WASHINGTON DC 20370-510
0
TRG
Docket No:
24 July 2001
1730-01
This is in reference to your application for correction of your
naval record pursuant to the provisions of Title 10 of the United
States Code section 1552.
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval
Records, sitting in executive session, considered your
application on 17 July 2001.
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative
regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of
Board.
your application, together with all material submitted in support
thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations
and policies.
Your allegations of error and
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire
record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was
insufficient to establish the existence of probable material
error or injustice.
The Board found that you enlisted in the Navy Reserve and
reported for three years of active duty on 6 August 1985.
The
record shows that you satisfactorily completed initial training
(AE
and on 22 December 1985 you reported aboard the USS
33). On 10 March 1986 you received nonjudicial punishment for an
unspecified period of unauthorized absence.
Subsequently, you
were admitted to the hospital after you made a suicidal gesture.
On 1 April 1986 you were diagnosed with a severe mixed
personality disorder with passive and borderline features.
psychiatrist concluded that the personality disorder was of such
severity as to preclude satisfactory military service and you
were extremely self-destructive and unpredictable.
administrative separation was strongly recommended.
SHASTA
Your
The
Based on the diagnosed personality disorder you were processed
for an administrative discharge.
processing, you elected to waive your procedural rights.
April 1986 the commanding officer recommended a general
discharge.
type of discharge warranted by your service record.
issued a general discharge on 10 April 1986.
After review the discharge authority directed the
In connection with this
You were
On 4
The type of discharge warranted by the service record is normally
based on conduct and overall trait averages which are computed
Your record
from marks assigned during periodic evaluations.
shows that you received a
"not observed" evaluation on 31 January
1986, and were not evaluated again in your remaining short period
of service.
was sufficient to support the issuance of a general discharge.
The Board concluded that the discharge was proper as issued and
no change is warranted.
The Board believed that the nonjudicial punishment
Accordingly, your application has been denied.
votes of the members of the panel will be furnished upon request.
The names and
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that
You are entitled to have the
favorable action cannot be taken.
Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board.
In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that a
presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval
record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the
existence of probable material error or injustice.
Sincerely,
W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director
2
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 08679-07
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Nevertheless, the Board concluded these factors were not sufficient to warrant recharacterization of your discharge or changes to your narrative reason for separation or reenlistment code because of your diagnosed personality disorder, period of UA, and since your conduct average was...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 00033-10
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 15 September 2010. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 02098-09
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. The Board noted that applicable regulations authorize a general discharge for individuals who are separated due to medical diagnoses of personality disorders. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 03857-00
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. offenses warranting disciplinary action and it was certainly within the commanding officer's discretion to impose NJP for those offenses. evidence is available, it appears that the reduction in grade was The Board concluded that the commanding officer did Concerning the reduction to PFC, the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 01531-10
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 13 October 2010. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. You were warned that any further deficiencies in your performance could result in an administrative separation and disciplinary action.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 11422-10
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your . Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. In comnection with this processing, you would have acknowledged the separation action and the separation authority would have approved a recommendation for separation.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 08579-06
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 12 February 2008. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 09688-07
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 19 November 2008. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Applicable regulations authorize the assignment of an RE-4 reenlistment code to Sailors who are separated due to a diagnosed personality disorder.
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 05750-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 18 May 2010. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 02574-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Recotds, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 18 February 2010. In March 1988 a second Navy Mental Health evaluation was conducted and you were diagnosed with attention deficit disorder, hyperactivity syndrome, tinea pedis, and alcohol dependence, and directed to complete your confinement. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate...