DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD
S
2 NAVY ANNE
X
WASHINGTON DC 20370-510
0
TRG
Docket No: 1684-01
3 August 2001
This is in reference to your application for correction of your
naval record pursuant to the provisions of Title 10 of the United
States Code section 1552.
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval
Records, sitting in executive session, considered your
application on 31 July 2001.
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative
regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of
Board.
your application, together with all material submitted in support
thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations
and policies.
Your allegations of error and
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire
record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was
insufficient to establish the existence of probable material
error or injustice.
You enlisted in the Naval Reserve on 3 December 1980 at age 20
On 25 March
and reported for initial training that same day.
1981 you received nonjudicial punishment for disrespect,
disobedience and assault.
28 March 1981 with your service characterized as honorable.
reported for an extended period of active duty on 3 August 1982.
During the period 6 January 1983 to 14 April 1983 you received
nonjudicial punishment on four occasions.
instances of disobedience, dereliction of duty, an unauthorized
absence of about nine hours, and assault.
You were released from active duty on
Your offenses were two
You
Based on your record of misconduct you were processed for an
administrative discharged by reason of misconduct.
with this processing, you elected to waive your right to have
your case heard by an administrative discharge board.
1983 the discharge authority approved the recommendation of your
commanding officer that you be discharged for misconduct with a
You were so
discharge under other than honorable conditions.
discharged on 6 June 1983.
On 25 May
In connection
In its review of your application the Board carefully weighed all
potentially mitigating factors,
regret for your actions in 1983.
factors and contentions were not sufficient to warrant
recharacterization of your discharge given your extensive record
of misconduct.
as issued and no change is warranted.
such as your youth and your
The Board found that these
The Board concluded that the discharge was proper
Accordingly, your application has been denied.
votes of the members of the panel will be furnished upon request.
The names and
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that
favorable action cannot be taken.
You are entitled to have the
Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board.
In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that a
presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval
record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the
existence of probable material error or injustice.
Sincerely,
W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director
2
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 02379-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 8 October 2002. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. January 1981 you...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2004 | 06373-04
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 23 March 2005. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 03041-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 13 November 2002. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of Board. On 21 August 1983 the discharge authority then directed an other than honorable discharge by reason of misconduct, and on 31 August 1983 you were so discharged. ...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 06672-05
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. After review by the discharge authority, the recommendation for separation was approved and on...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 03265-09
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. On 2 May 1983, administrative discharge action was initiated to separate you by reason of Misconduct due to drug abuse. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 08109-06
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.You enlisted in the Navy on 22 May 1980 at age 18. on 11 June and 10 December 1981 you received...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 11672-10
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Shortly thereafter, the discharge authority directed your commanding officer to issue you an other than honorable discharge by reason of misconduct due to drug abuse, and on 12 August 1983, you were so discharged. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record,...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 01573-10
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 9 November 2010. The Board, in its review of your entire record and application, carefully weighed all potentially mitigating factors, such as your youth, desire to upgrade your discharge, and assertion that your alcohol abuse was the result of a bombing incident that occurred in Beirut, Lebanon, on 23 October 1983. Consequently, when applying for a correction of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 06827-06
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.On 28 October 1981 you enlisted in the Marine Corps at age 18. On that same date, you were separated...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 03716-07
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. The Board, in its review of your entire record and application, carefully weighed all potentially mitigating factors, such as your youth, desire to upgrade your discharge, and the passage of time. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on...