Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 00439-00
Original file (00439-00.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAV
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS

Y

2 NAW ANNEX

WASHINGTON. D.C. 20370-5100

LCC:ddj
Docket No: 439-00
18 October 2000

From:
To:

Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records
Secretary of the Navy

Subj 

:

Ref:

Encl:

ENS 
REVIEW OF NAVAL  

REC6RD

(a)
(1)
(2)
(3)

Title 10 U.S.C. 1552

DD Form 149 w/attachments
Series of Documents
Subject’s naval record

1.
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner,
filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be
corrected to show Petitioner is entitled to Overseas Station Allowances
location of dependents and is entitled to  
assignment. Also show entitlement to reimbursement for travel of dependents to the
designated location.

OHA at the single rate for himself for unit of

 

(OHA) for designated

2. The Board, consisting of Mses. Hardbower, Newman, and Mr. Geisler, reviewed
Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 17 October 2000 and, pursuant to its
regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the
available evidence of record. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of the
enclosures, naval records, and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.

3. The Board, having reviewed all the facts of record pertaining to Petitioner
of error and injustice, finds as follows:

’s allegations

a. Before applying to this Board, Petitioner exhausted all administrative remedies

available under existing law and regulations within the Department of the Navy.

b. After reviewing the correspondence attached as enclosure  

that the request has merit and warrants favorable action.

(2), the Board concluded

CONCLUSION

Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record,
(2), the Board finds the existence of an
contents of enclosure  
following corrective action.

and especially in light of the
injustice warranting the

RECOMMENDATION:

That Petitioner’s naval record be corrected, where appropriate, to show that:

Docket No: 439-00

In October 1998 orders were issued directing Petitioner on an unaccompanied

overieas tour of duty and on 18 February 1999 under the UP of JFTR, paragraph

 

Dd(2),

approved Petitioner’s request to move his dependents to a designated location.

he is entitled to payment of  

OHA.)

C.

Petitioner was authorized  

OHA at the single rate for his assigned duty station

effective 9 September 1999.

d.

Petitioner is authorized reimbursement for travel of dependents and Dislocation

Allowance based on the move dependents made to the designated location.
authorized payment of all entitlements by virtue of an authorized permanent change of station
Reimbursement for travel will be for the cost of
move for approved travel for dependents.
the travel not exceed what the cost would have been to the U. S. Government.

Petitioner is

(NOTE: Petitioner should go to the closest facility which can compute travel vouchers and
ask them to compute monies due for travel and dislocation allowance as a result of this
action. Petitioner must present to the Agency computing the money due a copy of all
previous vouchers pertaining to himself and, if any, that of his dependents.
making the computation will not make the actual payment.
the computation of monies due, a copy of this letter and all other vouchers pertaining to the
travel to DFAS-DE-FYCC, 6760 E. Irvington Place, Denver, CO 80279-7100.)

The Agency
  Petitioner will then forward

e.

Petitioner was furnished a certificate of  “nonavailability” of a U. S. Flag Carrier for

travel to Wales, UK.

f.

That a copy of this Report of Proceedings be filed in Petitioner

’s naval record.

4. Pursuant to Section 6(c) of the revised Procedures of the Board for Correction of Naval
Records (32 Code of Federal Regulations, Section 723.6(c)) it is certified that quorum was
present at the Board ’s review and deliberations, and that the foregoing is a true and complete
record of the Board ’s proceedings in the above entitled matter.

Docket No: 439-00

ROBERT D. ZSALMAN
Recorder

Gl_~LL

G. L. ADAMS
Acting Recorder

5. Pursuant to the delegation of authority set out in Section 6(e) of the revised Procedures
of the Board for Correction of Naval Records (32 Code of Federal Regulations, Section
723.6(e)) and having assured compliance with its provisions, it is hereby announced that the
foregoing corrective action, taken under the authority of reference (a), has been approved by
the Board on behalf of the Secretary of the Navy.

18 October 2000



Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 11229-07

    Original file (11229-07.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 LCC Docket No. 11229-07 16 Jul 08 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Subj: REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD ICO we Ref: (a) Title 10 U.S.C. Petitioner will present a copy of all the ITDY orders issued and a copy of this letter to the Agency making the computations.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 06701-08

    Original file (06701-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    6701-08 26 Aug 08 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Subj: REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD ICO . Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show Petitioner is entitled to reimbursement for cost associated with moving his dependents while deployed on Indeterminate Temporary Duty orders as Individual...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 11082-09

    Original file (11082-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 LEC Docket No. i. Petitioner's application was staffed to the following offices within the Navy for review and comment: The Navy Personnel Command (PERS 41), the Chief of Naval Operations (CNO Code N130), and the Navy Supply System's Command (NAVSUPSYSCMD) . Pursuant to Section 6(c) of the revised Procedures of the Board for Correction of Naval Records (32 Code of Federal Regulations, Section...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 12354-08

    Original file (12354-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    They note that the Petitioner was counseled that the orders were no cost orders and he was not entitled to move at government expense. Petitioner’s incentive payment will not exceed what the cost would be to U.S. Government for moving 4,578 pounds. The HHG section MC Logistics Base, Albany, GA will compute the incentive payment due based on a constructive weight of 4,578 pounds and notify DFAS/IN of payment due to the Petitioner).

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06895-00

    Original file (06895-00.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD S 2 NAVY ANNE X WASHINGTON DC 20370-510 0 LCC:ddj Docket No: 6895-00 6 February 2001 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Refi (a) Title 10 U.S.C. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that Petitioner was discharged while...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 04354-01

    Original file (04354-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show entitled to ship household goods (HHGs) at government expense. CONCLUSION Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record, and especially in light of the contents of enclosure (2), the Board finds the existence of an injustice warranting the following corrective action. ...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060010283

    Original file (20060010283.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, back pay for Overseas Housing Allowance (OHA) and utilities paid for Malaysia from the period 10 March 2006 through 30 June 2006. Evidence of record shows that the applicant is entitled to receive OHA from the period of his retirement transition from 10 March 2006 to 30 June 2006. Therefore, the applicant is only entitled to OHA at the with-dependent rate for Korea from the period 3 March 2006 through 9 March 2006.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 07472-09

    Original file (07472-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    7472-09 17 Dec O09 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Subj: REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD [to Ref: (a} Title 10 U.S.C. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure {1} with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show Petitioner is entitled to travel of dependents from “ (One ‘Also, payment of associated station allowances, Temporary Lodging...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 08128-01

    Original file (08128-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show Petitioner is entitled to Permanent Change of Station (PCS) entitlements including Dislocation Allowance (DLA) for making a move from Madison, WI to Pensacola, FL. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Novello, and Ms. Hare, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 15 January...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 07369-00

    Original file (07369-00.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show he is entitled to reimbursement for rental cars while on Temporary Additional Duty (TAD) enroute to his new permanent duty station. In addition, Petitioner is authorized reimbursement of $75.00 for fuel and oil expenses for the total TAD periods. Pursuant to Section 6(c) of the revised...