Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 00421-00
Original file (00421-00.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS

2 NAVY ANNEX

WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100

SMC
Docket No: 
7 July 2000

00421-00

Dear Gunn

This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the
provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552.

A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive
session, considered your application on 7 July 2000. Your allegations of error and injustice
were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the
proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your
application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and
In addition, the Board considered the advisory
applicable statutes, regulations and policies.
opinion furnished by Headquarters Marine Corps, dated 8 March 2000, a copy of which is
attached.

After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the
evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or
injustice. In this connection, the Board substantially concurred with the comments contained
in the advisory opinion. The Board noted that your fitness reports for 14 May to
31 October 1997 and 1 November to 18 December 1997 are consistent with your relief for
the good of the service from the substance abuse counseling center intern program, in that
they both state you were misassigned. In view 
denied. The names and votes of the members of the panel will be furnished upon request.

‘of the above, your application has been

It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that favorable action cannot be
taken. You are entitled to have the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new
(,‘
and material evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board. In this 
regard, it is important to keep in mind that a presumption of regularity attaches to all official

records. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the
burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or
injustice.

Sincerely,

W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director

Enclosure

HEADQUARTERS 

UNITED STATES MARINE CORPS

3280RUSSELL ROA

D

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY

QUANTICO, VIRGINIA 22

  134-5 103

IN REPLY   REFER TO:

0

100
MMEA-85
MAR  
2001!
'0 

e 

MEMORANDUM FOR THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF

NAVAL RECORDS

Subj:

BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAV
UNNERY SERG
USMC

TION

olunteered for and was enthusiastically

1.
recommended to attend the Navy Drug and Alcohol Counselor school
in San Diego for a period of 11 weeks in May 1997. He
successfully completed the prescribed training and was assigned
to CG, MCLB Albany for duty in this billet MOS 8538. In
accordance with  
P5300.12A  (Marine Corps Substance Abuse
Program), there is a one year internship period in which the
counselor is evaluated before being assigned to a designated
This intern
position.
of the program. During
determined his basic s
interview skill development was less then reasonably expected as
a beginning interim counselor.

nsure the effectiveness
internship it was
ledge and client

MC0 

On 21 November 1997, Commanding General, Marine Corps

2.
Logistics Base, Albany Georgia submitted a Good of the Service
st to this Headquarters (MMEA-85) to reassign
(GOS
om the Substance
GySg
s Primary MOS.
Prog
for a GOS relief and issued orde
of his PMOS.
(DCC) AM was entered via unit diary to document this relief.

Upon approval of the GOS relief a Draw Case Code

Interim
as approved
th the needs

All Marines relieved from the Substance Abuse Counselor

3.
Program that do not complete the required tour length receive
this DCC.
good of the service relief.
removed.

The DCC is not derogatory in nature when it is for a
the DCC should not be

Therefore,

4.

Point of contact is



Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 08292-01

    Original file (08292-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Board found that you reenlisted in the Marine Corps on 17 January 1997 for four years as a staff sergeant (E-6) after over 11 years of prior active service. She is However, On 13 August 2001 the Commander, Albany, GA, endorsed your request as follows: Marine Corps Logistics Base, (H) has served our Marine Corps well over Her record book prior to her recent conviction "Staff Sergeant 17 years. the Enlisted Career Planning and Retention Manual, and commitment" and "Must have no...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06249-00

    Original file (06249-00.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The promotion would have been effective 1 May 1998: however, the Commandant of the Marine Corps (CMC), deleted his name from the selection list on 15 April 1998. Board concluded this Marine's record was outstanding enough to influence and convince CMC, MMEA-85 to waive the alcohol related Petitioner incident of 6 December 1997 and approve the waiver. Accordingly, the Board recommends the following corrective _- action.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 00379-02

    Original file (00379-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    You requested removal of your fitness reports for 1 March to 28 August 1998 and 1 October to 14 November 1998, as well as documentation of your relief for the good of the service from recruiting duty. ” CMC also “Recruited SNM was put on bed rest/no duty due to pregnancy problems/back problems. (2), the approval authority (GOS) relief from recruiting duty, has supports her request for Additionally, enclosure Based upon this review, 2. following errors require corrective action.

  • NAVY | DRB | 2000_Navy | ND00-00216

    Original file (ND00-00216.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentation In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the applicant, was considered:Copy of DD Form 214 (2 copies) Copy of undergraduate transcripts Graduate school (Doctoral program in Clinical Psychology) transcripts Current Vitae Certificate of Appointment by Commanding Officer, RTC, San Diego to E-1 for completing Recruit Training in top10% (2 copies) Letter of Commendation from Commanding Officer, RTC, San Diego, for attaining highest...

  • USMC | DRB | 2006_Marine | MD0600287

    Original file (MD0600287.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    MD06-00287 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review was received on 20051129. After I returned home, I was severely depressed for several months. Commanding Officer’s comments: “After considering all the evidence, I request that this Marine be discharged from the Marine Corps.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 01862-00

    Original file (01862-00.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. request to with back pay,...

  • USMC | DRB | 2002_Marine | MD02-00344

    Original file (MD02-00344.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentation In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the Applicant, was considered:Letter from State of New York Executive Department Division of Veterans Affairs dated January 15, 2003 Letter from Applicant dated September 21, 2001Copy of DD Form 214 Letter from State of New York Executive Department Division of Veterans Affairs dated May 1, 2003 Commander, Marine Corps Base Separation Authority Letter dated February 15, 2000 MCTFS Record of...

  • USMC | DRB | 2006_Marine | MD0600248

    Original file (MD0600248.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    If I am successful I getting my discharge upgraded to honorable and my reinlistment code upgraded I would really consider going back into active duty.”Additional issues submitted by Applicant’s counsel/representative (Disabled American Veterans): “Dear Chairperson: After a review of the Former Service Members (FSM) DD Form 293 Application for the Review of Discharge or Dismissal from the Armed Forces of the United States and all of evidence assembled for review, we continue to note the...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 01306-02

    Original file (01306-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    111 addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by HQMC ~ne~iiorantlu~n 1000 I0 of 2 April 2002, a copy of which is attached. The Marine Corps Foreign Language Program manager, who manages the Marine Corps' Foreign Language Proficiency Pay (FLPP) budget, has reviewed this request. Although the 8611 AMOS is not applicable to officers, there are several options in which officers with demonstrated foreign language proficiency can be eligible for FLPP.

  • USMC | DRB | 2005_Marine | MD0500456

    Original file (MD0500456.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    MD05-00456 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review was received on 20050112. The Applicant requests the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable. 930701: Applicant refused Level III alcohol treatment.930708: Director, Consolidated Drug and Alcohol Center, Marine Corps Base, Camp Lejeune, evaluation of report for refusal of treatment.