DEPARTMENT OF THE NAV
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
Y
2 NAVY ANNEX
WASHINGTON. D.C. 20370-5100
JRE
Docket No:
23 October
171-00
2OfKl
This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the
provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552.
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive
session, considered your application on 19 October 2000. Your allegations of error and
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures
applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board
consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your
naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the
evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or
injustice.
The Board found that you served on active duty from 26 August 1981 to 8 November 1983,
when you were discharged by reason of a personality disorder. You received a general
discharge because your overall trait average was 2.1, which is below the level required for
an honorable discharge.
The Board noted that a personality disorder is a condition not considered a disability by the
military departments or the Department of Veterans Affairs. There is no indication in your
record that you suffered from a ratable mental disorder during your enlistment. Accordingly,
there is no basis for granting your request for a “medical discharge”, and your application
has been denied. The names and votes of the members of the panel will be furnished upon
request.
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that favorable action cannot be
taken. You are entitled to have the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new
and material evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board. In this
regard, it is important to keep in mind that a presumption of regularity attaches to all official
records. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the
burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or
injustice.
Sincerely,
W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 03806-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 3 October injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 11771-09
~ A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your *— application on 15 October 2009. On 3 October 1994, administrative discharge action was initiated by reason of your diagnosed personality disorder. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 04477-06
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable mate ial error or injustice.You enlisted in the Navy on 27 October 1998 at age 21. You then served without incident until 6...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 04852-06
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 19 July 2007. The Board found that you enlisted in the Navy on 25 October 1999. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 08452-06
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.The Board found that you enlisted in the Navy on 8 October 1986. You received a second nonjudicial...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 10646-07
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 2 October 2008. The VA denied your request for service connection for nine other conditions, to include the personality disorder, which the VA classifies as a developmental disorder rather than a disability. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2004 | 07976-04
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 6 October 2005. In view of the foregoing, the Board concluded that it would not be in the interest of justice for it to delete the diagnosis of a personality disorder from your record, or change your reenlistment code to one that might permit you to reenlist without having to obtain a waiver of your disqualifying psychiatric condition and basis for discharge. ...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2004 | 02188-04
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100JRE Docket No. Documentary material considered by the Board consistedof your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policiesAfter careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 01966-10
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. On 4 October 1990 your commanding officer recommended that you be separated from the Navy with an honorable discharge by reason of “Other Physical/Mental Conditions- Personality Disorder”. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 09530-06
As you did not submit any new material evidence in support of your reconsideration request, the Board limited its review to your new request.A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 25 October 2007. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.After...