NAVY
DEPARTMENT OF
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
THE
2
NAVY ANNEX
WASHINGTON DC
2037Q-5100
TRG
Docket No: 8217-98
6 May 1999
Dear Ms.
for correction of your
of title 10 of the United
This is in reference to your application
naval record pursuant to the provisions
States Code section 1552.
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction Of Naval
Records, sitting in executive session, considered your
Your allegations of error and
application on 4 May 1999.
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative
regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of
Board.
your application, together with all material submitted in support
thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations
and policies.
.
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire
record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was
insufficient to establish the existence of probable material
error or injustice.
The Board found that you enlisted in the Navy on 23 February 1993
at age 18.
punishment for an absence from your appointed place of duty. On
22 January 1998 you received another nonjudicial punishment for
making a false official statement.
included a reduction in rate from SN (E-3) to SA (E-2).
On 29 February 1996 you received nonjudicial
The punishment imposed
The record also shows that on 4 February 1998 you were issued a
general discharge by reason of parenthood or custody of minor
children.
and were assigned an
At that time you were not recommended for reenlistment
RE-4 reenlistment code.
Regulations allow for the assignment of an RE-4 reenlistment code
when an individual is discharged by reason of parenthood or
custody of minor children.
Your record which includes two
nonjudicial punishments could support the assignment of an RE-4
reenlistment code.
Finally, the Board noted that regulations
require the assignment of an RE-4 reenlistment code to individual
serving in pay grade E-2 after the completion of an extended
period of active duty.
Given the circumstances, the Board
.
concluded that the RE-4 reenlistment code was properly assigned
and no change was warranted.
Accordingly, your application has been denied.
votes of the members of the panel will be furnished upon request.
The names and
You may request a review of the characterization of your service
by completing the enclosed application, DD Form 293, and sending
it to the Naval Discharge Review Board.
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that
You are entitled to have the
favorable action cannot be taken.
Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board.
In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that a
presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval
on the applicant to demonstrate the
record, 'the burden is
material error or injustice.
existence of probable
Sincerely,
W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director
Enclosure
2
.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 05509-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 4 March 2003. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 11054-08
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on $ June 2009. After review, the separation authority directed an honorable discharge due te parenthood or custody of minor children: and the assignment of an RE-4 reenlistment .code.-.You--« were so discharged on 13 September 2006. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR0916 14
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 §. A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 23 July 2013. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 07785-10
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 10 August 2010. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. ysalso considered your assertion that you honorably served for Sarly 18 years and the only reason you were not receiving a full ension was due to...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2004 | 02990-04
After your discharge, you were rated as 10% disabled by the Department of Veterans Affairs.In your application you are requesting that the SPD code be changed to “JDG”, which will indicate that you were discharged by reason of parenthood or custody of minor children and your discharge was involuntary. Further, there is no evidence that a discharge by reason of physical disability was warranted. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the...
NAVY | DRB | 2004_Navy | ND04-01141
The Applicant requests the reason for the discharge be changed to hardship. PART I - APPLICANT’S ISSUES AND DOCUMENTATION Complete discharge package unavailable PART III – RATIONALE FOR DECISION AND PERTINENT REGULATION/LAW Discussion The Applicant was discharged on 19990319 with an honorable discharge by reason of convenience of the Government due to parenthood or custody of minor children (A).
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR1174 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 24 February 2015. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | DRB | 2002_Navy | ND02-00404
ND02-00404 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review, received 020215, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to honorable and the reenlistment code change from RE-4 to RE-1. Documentation In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the Applicant, was considered:Applicant's DD Form 214 PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE Prior Service (component, dates of service, type of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 06881-98
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. of pending administrative separation action by reason of convenience of the government due to parenthood. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 05566-05
Your allegations of error and injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to...