Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 07896-98
Original file (07896-98.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
Y
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAV
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS

2 NAW ANNEX

WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100

CRS
Docket No:
25 March 1999

7896-98

Dear

This is in reference to your application for correction of your
naval record pursuant to the provisions of Title 10, United
States Code; Section 1552.

A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval
Records, sitting in executive session, considered your
application on 24 March 1999.
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative
regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of
Board.
your application, together with all material submitted in support
thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations
and policies.

Your allegations of error and

After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire
record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was
insufficient to establish the existence of probable material
error or injustice.

Your record reflects that you received seven nonjudicial

The Board found that you enlisted in the Navy on 11 July 1979 at
age 21.
punishments.
totalling 11 days, absence from your appointed place of duty on
six occasions, and two instances of violation of a lawful general
regulation.

The offenses included unauthorized absences

When informed of the recommendation, you elected to

On 1 June 1982 the commanding officer recommended that you be
separated with an other than honorable discharge by reason of
misconduct.
waive your right to present your case to an administrative
discharge board.
recommendation for separation was approved and you were
discharged with an other than honorable discharge on 30 July
1982.

After review by the discharge authority, the

In its review of your application the Board carefully weighed all
potentially mitigating factors,
immaturity.

However, the Board concluded that these factors were

such as your youth and

not sufficient to warrant recharacterization of your discharge,
given your frequent involvement with military authorities.
Board especially noted the fact that you were the subject of
seven disciplinary actions within a period of about three years.
Therefore, the Board concluded that no change to the discharge is
The
warranted.
names and votes of the members of the panel will be furnished
upon request.

Accordingly, your application has been denied.

The

It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that
You are entitled to have the
favorable action cannot be taken.
Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board.
In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that a
presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval
record, the burden is on the applicant   to demonstrate the
existence of probable material error or injustice.

Sincerely,

W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director



Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY1998 | 04225-98

    Original file (04225-98.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Na-1 Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 13 July 1999. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 04699-10

    Original file (04699-10.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 15 February 2011. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. The record does not reflect the disciplinary action taken, if any, for this 76 day period of UA.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 04718-11

    Original file (04718-11.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 14 February 2012. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 01759-01

    Original file (01759-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, Documentary regulations and policies. officer recommended discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to frequent involvement. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 04260-07

    Original file (04260-07.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.You enlisted in the Marine Corps on 15 September 1978 at age 18. Your offenses were seven periods...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 05461-02

    Original file (05461-02.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three—member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 25 February 2003. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 10961-02

    Original file (10961-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Nevertheless, the Board concluded that these factors were not sufficient to warrant recharacterization of your discharge because of your frequent misconduct, which resulted in five NJPs and your lengthy period of UA which resulted in your request for discharge. Consequently, when applying...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY1998 | NC9803817

    Original file (NC9803817.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 7 July 1999. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. The Board found that these factors and contentions were not sufficient to warrant recharacterization of your discharge given your repeated misconduct,...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 05722-06

    Original file (05722-06.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. discharge authority, the recommendation for separation was approved and on 2 May 1982 you received an other than honorable discharge. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 12523 11

    Original file (12523 11.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 2 October 2012. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. At that time you waived your right to consult with legal counsel and to present your case to an administrative discharge board (ADB).