DEPARTMENT OF THE NAV
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
Y
2 NAVY ANNEX
WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100
TJR
Docket No: 7703-98
2 June 1999
Dear
This is in reference to your
naval record pursuant to the
States Code, Section 1552,
application for correction of your
provisions of Title 10, United
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval
Records, sitting in executive session, considered your
application on 25 May 1999.
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative
regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of
Board.
your application, together with all material submitted in support
and applicable statutes, regulations,
thereof, your naval record,
and policies.
Your allegations of error and
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire
record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient
to establish the existence of probable material error or
injustice.
The Board found you enlisted in the Navy on 11 June 1990 and at
Your record shows that you served for
the age of 18.
years without incident but on 6 March 1992 you received
nonjudicial punishment (NJP) for drunk driving.
imposed was extra duty for 15 days.
disenrolled from a Level II alcohol abuse treatment program. On
23 June 1992 you were notified that administrative separation
action had been initiated by reason of misconduct due to
commission of a serious ‘offense and alcohol rehabilitation
failure.
right to present your case to an administrative discharge board.
After consulting with legal counsel you waived your
Shortly thereafter, you
nearlyatwo
The punishment
Subsequently, your commanding officer recommended you be issued a
general by reason of misconduct due to commission of a serious
offense and alcohol rehabilitation failure.
the discharge authority approved the foregoing recommendation and
directed a general discharge by reason of misconduct, and an RR-4
reenlistment code.
On 27 August 1992 you were so discharged.
On 11 August 1992
The Board, in its review of your entire record and application,
carefully considered all mitigating factors, such as your youth
and immaturity, and your contention that you would like your
narrative reason for separation and reenlistment code changed so
that you may reenlist.
contentions that if you were given a chance, you could do the
Navy a great service.
materials submitted were not sufficient to warrant a change of
your narrative reason for separation or reenlistment code given
Further, an
the seriousness of your alcohol related misconduct.
individual separated by reason of misconduct must receive an RE-4
Given all the circumstances of your case the
reenlistment code.
Board concluded your narrative reason for separation and
reenlistment code were proper as issued and no change is
warranted.
Accordingly, your application has been denied.
The Board further considered your
However, the Board found the evidence and
The names and votes of the members of the panel will be furnished
upon request.
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that
You are entitled to have the
favorable action cannot be taken.
Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board.
In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that a
presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval
record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the
existence of probable material error or injustice.
Sincerely,
W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 10212-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 3 September 2003. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Further, an RE-4 reenlistment code is required wher Nevertheless, the Board concluded these On 29 April 1992 your On 4 June 1992 the It further...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 02458-08
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 20 August 2008. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. You were assigned a reentry code of RE-4, On 3 November 1993 the Bureau of Naval Personnel informed your command that you did not qualify for...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 02173-10
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. On 6 May 1992 an ADB recommended discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to a pattern of misconduct, commission of a serious offense, and alcohol rehabilitation failure. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 07937-02
A three—member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 26 February 2003. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Applicable regulations require the assignment of an RE-4 reenlistment code when an individual is discharged by reason of misconduct.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 03943-99
Though Petitioner's BCNR case file does not establish Petitioner's actual notice of the current version of DOD Directive 1010.4, the fact Petitioner's rehabilitative potential was affirmatively considered and assessed prior to his discharge makes resolution of this issue unnecessary. Application to Petitioner's case. drug use was evidenced by a urinalysis for methamphetamine and Petitioner's further drug use following a second positive urinalysis in Petitioner's history of drug use and...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 04677-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 3 March 2010. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR1810 14
three-member panel of the Board for: Correction of Naval Records, - sitting in executive session, considered your application on 3 March 2015. your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Subsequently, administrative discharge action was initiated by reason of misconduct due to commission of a serious offense.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 07515-00
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 13 February 2001. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of Board. general discharge by reason of misconduct due to commission of a An ADB recommended you be issued a After consulting with legal However, the discharge authority...
NAVY | BCNR | CY1998 | NC9808785
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 22 June 1999. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 00801-99
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 18 August 1999. Your record reflects that prior to your reenlistment you had four convictions for driving under the influence (DUI) and had completed in-patient (level 111) alcohol rehabilitation treatment in April 1986. The Board notes that the Navy is very reluctant to discharge an individual with more than 19 years of service.