DEPARTMENT OF'THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
2 NAVY ANNEX
WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100
,
BAN
Docket No: 06757-09
321 March 2010
This is in reference to your application for correction of your
naval record pursuant to the provisions of Title 10, United
States Code, Section 1552.
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval
Records, sitting in executive session, considered your
application on 31 March 2010. Your allegations of error and
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative
regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this
Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of
your application, together with all material submitted in support
thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations,
and policies.
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire
record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient
to establish the existence of probable material error or
injustice.
You enlisted in the Navy on 28 September 1990, and served without
disciplinary incident. However, on 22 August 1991, you were
administratively separated due to pregnancy, after 10 months and
25 days of service. You received an honorable discharge, and an
RE-4 reenlistment code. The Board noted that there was no
evidence in your record, and you submitted none, to support your
contention of any hardship. Additionally, the Board believed
your reason for separation, “pregnancy”, is more favorable than
the “hardship” discharge you are currently seeking.
Therefore, the Board, in its review of your entire record and
application, carefully weighed all potentially mitigating
factors, such as your youth. Nevertheless, the Board concluded
these factors were not sufficient to warrant a change of your
reason for separation. You were appropriately given a narrative
reason for separation of “pregnancy” and a reenlistment code of
RE-4. Accordingly, your application has been denied. The names
and votes of the members of the panel will be furnished upon
request,
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that
favorable action cannot be taken. You are entitled to have the
Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board.
In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that a
presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
Consequentiy, when applying for a correction of an official naval
record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the
existence of probable material error or injustice.
Sincerely,
W. DEAN P
Executive Di
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 03210-08
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 3 June 2008. your allegations of error and injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. You contend in your application, that the discharge by reason of parenthood is in error because you should have been discharged by reason of hardship. You believe that the reason of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 01214-10
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In the absence of evidence which demonstrates that you should have been discharged by reason of hardship vice pregnancy, the Board was unable to recommend any corrective action in your case. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 04373-11
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 26 May 2011. You served on active duty in the Navy from 29 December 1986 to 1 March 1988, when you were discharged by reason of pregnancy. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 01949-01
On 16 October 1995 you were honorably released from active duty, transferred to the Naval Reserve, and assigned an RE-4 reenlistment code. You did not provide the second page You were not An RE-3B means the individual was discharged for Regulations authorize the assignment of an RE-3B or RE-4 reenlistment code to individuals separated by reason of pregnancy. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 00931-01
your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. honorable discharge from the Marine Corps Reserve and were recommended for reenlistment. The Board thus concluded that there is no error or injustice in Accordingly, your application has been your reenlistment code.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 12117-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 25 August 2010. The Board noted that applicable regulations require the assignment of an RE-4 reenlistment code to individuals who are separated due to erroneous enlistment based on medical conditions that existed prior to entry into the service. Nevertheless, the Board found that these factors were not sufficient to warrant changing your reenlistment code due to...
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 03266-99
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 1 September 1999. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 06555-07
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.You enlisted in the Navy on 17 September 2002 at age 20. You served over two years without incident...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 09607-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 15 January 2003. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. reenlistment code was correctly assigned as it reflected your overall performance during this period of active service and the fact that you were not recommended for either retention or advancement. Consequently, when...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 02395-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 2 March 2010. Documentary Material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. It also considered your statement regarding your period of service and the circumstances resulting in your discharge.