DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
2 NAVY ANNEX
WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100
BAN
Docket No: 05384-09
26 April 2010
From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records
To: Secretary of the Navy
Subj: REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD OF}
Ref: (a) 10 U.S.C. 1552
Encl: (1) DD Form 149 with attachments
(2) Case summary
(3) Subject's naval record
1. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a
former enlisted member of the United States Navy, filed enclosure
(L) with this Board requesting, in effect, that his RE-4
reenlistment code be changed from RE-4 to RE-3F on 17 August
2006.
2. The Board, consisting of Messrs . ee ARE and
Ms. @QURMMMMexeviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and
injustice on 7 April 2010 and, pursuant to its regulations,
determined that the corrective action indicated below should be
taken on the available evidence of record. Documentary material
considered by the Board consisted of the enclosures, naval
records, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies.
3. The Board, having reviewed all the facts of record pertaining
to Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice finds as
follows:
a. Before applying to this Board, Petitioner exhausted all
administrative remedies available under existing law and
regulations within the Department of the Navy.
b. Petitioner enlisted in the Navy on 21 August 1995, and
served without disciplinary incident. However, Petitioner failed
the physical readiness test (PRT) three times within a four year
period and was processed for an administrative separation. He
did not object to his separation and received severance pay as a
result of 11 years of service. Therefore, on 17 August 2006, he
was separated at the end of his obligated service with an
honorable discharge and an RE-4 reenlistment code due to his PRT
failures. However, Petitioner claims that his RE-4 reenlistment
code was erroneous and should have been RE-3F (failed the PFA).
CONCLUSION:
Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record the
Board concludes that Petitioner's request warrants favorable
action. The Board believes that since he was separated due to
his PRT failures, the correct reenlistment code should have been
RE-3F vice RE-4. Additionally, the Board noted that Petitioner
did not have any disciplinary issues and his work performance was
outstanding based on his evaluations. Therefore, the Board
concludes that his RE-4 reenlistment code should be changed to
RE-3F, and his separation code should be changed from JGH to JBK,
In view of the above, the Board recommends the following
corrective action.
RECOMMENDATION :
a. That Petitioner's naval record be corrected to show that he
received an RE-3F on 17 August 2006 vice an RE-4 reenlistment
code now of record.
b. That Petitioner’s separation code be changed to JBK vice
JGH.
c. That any material or entries inconsistent with or relating
to the Board's recommendation be corrected, removed, or
completely expunged from Petitioner's record and that no such
entries or material be added to the record in the future.
d. That any material directed to be removed from Petitioner’s
naval record be returned to the Board, together with a copy of
this Report of Proceedings, for retention in a confidential file
Maintained for such purpose, with no cross reference being made a
part of Petitioner’s naval record.
4. Pursuant to Section 6(c) of the revised Procedures of the
Board for Correction of Naval Records (32) Code of Federal
Regulations, Section 723.6(c)) it is certified that a quorum was
present at the Board's review and deliberations, and that the
foregoing is a true and complete record of the Board’s
proceedings in the above entitled matter.
Qron)}) Droapr
ROBERT D. ZSALMAN BRIAN J GHORGE
Recorder Acting Recorder
5. Pursuant to the delegation of authority set out in Section
6{e) of the revised Procedures of the Board for Correction of
Naval Records (32 Code of Federal Regulation, Section 723.6(e))
and having assured compliance with its provisions, it is hereby
announced that the foregoing corrective action, taken under the
authority of reference (a), has been approved by the Board on
behalf of the Secretary of the Navy.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 02668-06
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) , Petitioner, a former enlisted member of the Navy, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting that his reenlistment code be changed.2 The Board, consisting of Messrs andreviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 3 October 2006 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. Petitioner’s separation performance evaluation for the period...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 05470-06
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-S 100SMWDocket No: 5470-06 16 October 2006From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the NavySubj OF NAVAL RECORD OFRef: (a) 10 U.S.C. In his application, Petitioner states that he served four years of honorable service and was never the subject of any disciplinary action, but received an RE-4 reenlistment code because he failed two PRT’s. However, regulations also...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 08175-08
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 . Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a former enlisted member of the Navy, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting a change in his RE-4 reenlistment code. That Petitioner's naval record be corrected to show that on 18 October 2005 Petitioner was issued an RE-3F reenlistment code vice the RE-4 reenlistment code actually issued on that date.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 09219-07
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 SIN Docket No: 09219-07 17 September 2008 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy ty Subj: REVIEW OF NAVAL OF RECORD Ref: (a) 10 U.S.C. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a former enlisted member of the Navy, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting a change in his RE-4 reenlistment code. The Board, consisting of Say ena, and...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 07364-08
On 31 July 1995, Petitioner was honorably discharged from active duty and assigned an RE-4 reenlistment code. In this regard, the reenlistment code of RE-4 means that she is not recommended for reenlistment. The Board therefore concludes that no useful purpose is served by assignment of the most restrictive reenlistment code of RE-4, and the RE-3F code more accurately reflects the quality of her service.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 05885-06
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a former enlisted member of the Navy, filed an application with this Board requesting a change in his separation code to establish entitlement to full separation pay. The Board, consisting of Mr. , Mr. and Mr. reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error a the injustice on 24 October 2006 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. ...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 12304-09
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a former enlisted member of the Navy, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting that his reenlistment code and nonrecommendation for reenlistment be changed. g. Reference (b) authorizes the issuance of an RE-4 reenlistment code to Sailors who have completed their enlistment and are serving in paygrade E-4 at the time of their release from active duty. That Petitioner’s naval record be further corrected to reflect that he was...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 08747-07
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a former enlisted member of the Navy, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting that his reenlistment code be changed.2 The Board consisting of Messrsand reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 17 June 2008 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. Reference (b) authorizes the issuance of an RE-4 reenlistment...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 03401-06
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show Petitioner was entitled to payment of full separation pay when he was discharged from active duty effective 14 December 2005. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Beckett, Dunn, and Pfeiffer, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 17 October 2006 and, pursuant to its...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 11839-09
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 SJN Docket No: 11839-09 30 August 2010 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Ref: (a) 16 U:S.¢., 1552 Encl: (1) DD Form 149 with attachments (2) Case Summary (3) Subject's naval record 1. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a former enlisted member of the Navy, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting a change in his RE-4...