DEPARTMENT OF THE NAV
Y
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
2
NAVY ANNEX
WASHINGTON DC 203704100
TRG
Docket No: 5083-98
13 April 1999
Dear Mr.
w---:
This is in reference to your application for correction of your
naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the United
States Code section 1552.
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval
Records, sitting in executive session, considered your
application on 6 April 1999.
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative
regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this
Board.
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of
your application, together with all material submitted in support
thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations
and policies.
Your allegations of error and
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire
record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was
insufficient to establish the existence of probable material
error or injustice.
The Board found that you enlisted in the Navy on 13 November 1985
at age 22.
On 16 December 1985, the Defense Investigative
Service reported that you had a preservice criminal record.
However, for some reason no action was taken at that time.
November 1986 you received nonjudicial punishment for larceny.
On 10
An investigation dated 26 March 1987 concluded that you had
concealed a preservice felony conviction,
made against your recruiter could not be substantiated.
June 1987 you were notified of separation processing by reason of
fraudulent enlistment due to your concealment of arrests for
indecent exposure, petty theft, burglary and forgery. In
connection with this processing you elected to waive your right
to have your case heard by an administrative discharge board. On
10 August 1987 the discharge authority directed a general
discharge.
You were so discharged on 10 August 1987.
and the charges you had
On 12
In its review of your application the Board carefully weighed all
potentially mitigating factors,
contention, in effect, that your discharge was improper.
Board found that these factors and contentions were not
sufficient to warrant recharacterization of the discharge given
such as your youth and
The
the documentation of record which shows that you fraudulently
enlisted.
issued and no change is warranted.
The Board concluded that the discharge was proper as
Accordingly, your application has been denied.
votes of the members of the panel will be furnished upon request.
The names and
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that
You are entitled to have the
favorable action cannot be taken.
Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board.
In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that a
presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval
record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the
existence of probable material error or injustice.
Sincerely,
W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director
2
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 02844-08
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 9 December 2008. In accordance with applicable Navy regulations your commanding officer transmitted the results of the ADB proceedings to the Commander, Naval Military Personnel Command (NMPC) urging that the ADB’s recommendation for retention be disapproved and that you be discharged, but because of the recommendation for retention, that you receive a general...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 03550-07
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 26 August 2008. It is clear that individuals who have been denied a security clearance cannot serve in the Navy. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 07502-07
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.You enlisted in the Navy on 1 November 1989 at age 19. As a result, on 18 January 1990, you were...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 10919-07
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.You enlisted in the Navy on 18 April 2006 at age 18. You have also provided a current psychiatric...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 07559-08
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 25 September 2008. In a letter dated 29 November 1999, a psychiatrist with a Louisiana State University student health center stated that you had an organic mental disorder with depression and a personality disorder, both secondary to a severe head injury you suffered as a teenager. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 04110-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 15 November 2002. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. The evaluation resulted in On 16 August Based on your concealment of your drug and alcohol abuse history and psychiatric hospitalizations, you were processed for discharge by reason of fraudulent enlistment. ...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 00870-01
870-01 24 January 2002 Dear Mr.- This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of Title 10, United States Code, Section 1552. considered your application on Your allegations of error and injustice were A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Navy Records, sitting in executive session, 16 January 2002. reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. On 3...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2004 | 04617-04
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies.After careful andconscientious conserdation of theentire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice YouenlistedtheMarine Corps on 5 July 1968 at age 17. Additionally, on 28 October 1968, during a physical...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 08162-01
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together-with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. The Board found that you enlisted in the Navy on 11 January 1995. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 07925-00
Your allegations of error and After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Applicable regulations require the assignment of an RE-4 reenlistment code to individuals who are separated due to erroneous enlistment based on preservice use of drugs. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the...