DEPARTMENT OF THE NAV
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
Y
2
NAVY ANNEX
WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100
JRE
Docket No: 4879-98
14 April 1999
Dear
This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the
provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552.
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive
session, considered your application on 25 February 1999. Your allegations of error and
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures
applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board
consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your
naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the
evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or
injustice.
The Board found that you served on active duty in the Navy from 28 July 1978 to 2 July
1982, when you were released from active duty to the Naval Reserve. You underwent a
physical examination 24 July 1982, and were found physically qualified for service. You
stated that you were in good health at that time, and denied any symptoms of a mental
disorder. You were discharged from the Naval Reserve on 25 August 1993, after being found
not physically qualified for service because of a mental disorder, which was not related to
your naval service.
In the absence of evidence which demonstrates that you were unfit for duty when released
from active duty on 2 July 1982, or that your condition was incurred during a period of duty
in the Naval Reserve, the Board was unable to recommend any corrective action in your
case. Accordingly, your application has been denied. The names and votes of the members
of the panel will be furnished upon request.
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that favorable action cannot be
taken. You are entitled to have the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new
and material evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board. In this
regard, it is important to keep in mind that a presumption of regularity attaches to all official
records. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the
burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or
injustice.
Sincerely,
W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 11037-08
As a result of that rating action, your case was referred to the Bureau of Medicine and Surgery for review. After being advised of the options available.to you, you elected to request transfer to the Retired List of the Marine Corps Reserve with entitlement to retired pay at age 60. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 03068-03
on 13 December Following your discharge, the Department of Veterans Affairs denied your request for service connection for a mental disorder, after determining that you did not suffer from a mental disorder that was incurred in or aggravated by your military service. indicate that you were diagnosed or treated for a mental disorder during your enlistment, duty on 12 November 1982, physical examination. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 00309-08
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 16 October 2008. The Board could not find any indication in your naval record that you suffered from a significant mental disorder. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 08538-06
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.The Board found that you underwent psychological evaluation on 20 May 2000. On 12 February 2004,...
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | Document scanned on Wed Feb 14 13_34_15 CST 2001
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL. He noted that He The Board specifically noted In its review of your application the Board conducted a thorough review of both service and medical records, and the post-service medical records you provided. The Board also could not ignore the multiple notations With regard to your psychiatrist’s opinion that you suffered from PTSD, a paranoid personality disorder and a possible organic brain syndrome, the Board noted that like the other...
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | Document scanned on Wed Feb 14 14_01_05 CST 2001
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL. He noted that He The Board specifically noted In its review of your application the Board conducted a thorough review of both service and medical records, and the post-service medical records you provided. The Board also could not ignore the multiple notations With regard to your psychiatrist’s opinion that you suffered from PTSD, a paranoid personality disorder and a possible organic brain syndrome, the Board noted that like the other...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 11013-08
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 20 November 2008. The Board concluded that the available records are insufficient to demonstrate that you were unfit for duty on 18 September 1968 due to a mental disorder was incurred in or aggravated by your service on active duty for training in the Navy Reserve. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 04585-98
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In the absence of evidence which demonstrates that you were unfit to perform the duties of your office, grade, rank or rating at the time of your discharge from the Marine Corps in 1973, the Board was unable to recommend any corrective action in your case. Consequently, when applying for a...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 01732-02
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies, and the record of the two previous reviews of your application by the Board. In addition, the Board considered an advisory opinion furnished by the Director, Naval Council of Personnel Boards dated 1 May 2002, a copy of which is attached. An SNMHAS record entry dated 12 August 1987 indicates...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 08210-07
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 14 August 2008. You were separated from the Navy with a bad conduct discharge on 31 January 1997. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.