DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
2
NAVY ANNEX
WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100
TRG
Docket No:
18 February
3029-99
2000
This is in reference to your application for correction of your
naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the United
States Code section 1552.
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval
Records, sitting in executive session, considered your
application on 8 February 2000.
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative
regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of
Board.
your application, together with all material submitted in support
thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations
and policies.
Your allegations of error and
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire
record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was
insufficient to establish the existence of probable material
error or injustice.
The record shows that in June and August 1994 you
The Board found that you enlisted in the Naval Reserve on 10
December 1993 at age 18 and reported for active duty on 10
January 1994.
received nonjudicial punishments for not taking notes in class
and for writing letters in class.
further disciplinary infractions until 10 August 1996.
date you received nonjudicial punishment for an unspecified
period of unauthorized absence and disobedience.
evaluations for the period from 16 July 1996 to 15 January 1997
contain adverse marks of 1.0 in the categories of quality of work
and teamwork.
promotion or retention in the Navy.
active duty on 25 January 1997 with your service characterized as
honorable.
reenlistment and were assigned an RE-4 reenlistment code.
In addition, you were not recommended for
At that time you were not recommended for
You were released from
You then served without
On that
The performance
Concerning the last NJP you state that you were having
difficulties with your 90 day assignment on mess duty.
state, in effect, that you felt you could not continue without
help and disobeyed orders and left your duty station in order to
obtain counseling.
your problems adjusting to shipboard life and from being away
You claim your difficulties were caused by
You
from your son.
documentation showing that you are now a member of the National
Guard and have provided good references from your superiors in
the Guard.
connnanding officer of the recruiting district has recommended a
waiver so that you can be enlisted in the Navy.
recommendation has not been approved by higher authority.
You have submitted evidence showing that the
In support of your case you have submitted
Apparently, this
The Board concluded that a record of three nonjudicial
punishments, even though they appear to be minor offenses, and
the adverse performance evaluations were sufficient to support
the assignment of the RE-4 reenlistment code and there has been
no abuse of the command's discretion in this matter.
Accordingly, your application has been denied.
votes of the members of the panel will be furnished upon request.
The names and
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that
You are entitled to have the
favorable action cannot be taken.
Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board.
In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that a
presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval
record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the
existence of probable material error or injustice.
Sincerely,
W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director
2
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 06924-08
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 6 January 2009. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 03932-01
You were The Board believed that a record of three consecutive marginal and adverse performance evaluations was sufficient to support the assignment of the RE-4 reenlistment code, despite the recommendation for retention contained in the last performance evaluation of record. the Board concludes that if a performance evaluation for the period 15 June 1997 until your release from active duty on 6 October 1997 had been available, it would have been adverse. Consequently, when applying for a...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 05321-00
Applicable regulations require the assignment of an RE-4 reenlistment code when an individual is discharged by reason of misconduct. the Board could not find an error or others in your situation, injustice in the assignment of your reenlistment code. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 09013-97
The Board found that you enlisted in the Naval Reserve on 29 January 1994 and reported to active duty on 13 April 1994. record shows that you received nonjudicial punishment February 1996 for three specifications of failure to obey an order or regulation. "1 was never told about having to day," or words to that statement, to wit: work a half day after our duty effect, which statement was false in that (she) was told by Boatswain's Mate First Class . the punishment was considered to...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 01447-01
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. You have submitted documentation showing that your knee You state that the commanding officer agreed with You believe an The Board noted that there is no documentation in the record to support your contentions concerning the nonjudicial punishment and the punishment imposed. punishment, for...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 05187-99
opinions from Headquarters Marine Corps (HQMC) dated 20 December copies of which are attached. to this Board, the Performance Evaluation Review Board (PERB) at HQMC has removed this comment from your last The Board first considered your contentions of error concerning the NJP of 10 January 1996, specifically, that although the service record entry of 8 ,January 1996 shows that the advice 5 M.J. 238 (CMA 1977) was required by United States v. Booker, given, it does not state that this advice...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 08372-06
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.You enlisted in the Navy on 19 June 1996 at age 18. Nevertheless, the Board concluded these factors...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 04708-01
Your allegations of error and injustice were A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Navy Records, sitting in executive session, 12 December 2001. reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. failure to pay a...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 02258-09
R three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 3 February 2010. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 05563-01
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. During the period 16 March 1996 to 13 May 1998, you You reenlisted in the Navy on 13 April 1990 for five years and subsequently extended that enlistment on three occasions totaling 39 months. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the...