Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 02956-99
Original file (02956-99.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
D E P A R T M E N T  O F  T H E  N A V Y  
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 

2 NAW ANNEX 

WASHINGTON DC  20370-5100 

SMC 
Docket No:  02956-99 
5 August  1999 

This is in  reference to your application for correction of  your naval record pursuant to the 
provisions of  title 10 of  the United States Code, section  1552. 

A three-member  panel of  the Board  for Correction of  Naval Records,  sitting in  executive 
session, considered your application on 5 August  1999.  Your allegations of error and 
injustice were reviewed in  accordance with  administrative regulations and procedures 
applicable to the proceedings of  this Board.  Documentary material considered by  the Board 
consisted of  your application, together with  all material submitted in  support thereof, your 
naval record and  applicable statutes, regulations and  policies.  In addition, the Board 
considered the report of  the Headquarters Marine Corps Performance Evaluation Review 
Board  (PERB), dated 3 May  1999, a copy of  which is attached. 

After careful and conscientious consideration of  the entire record,  the Board  found that the 
evidence submitted was  insufficient to establish the existence of  probable material error or 
injustice.  In  this connection, the Board  substantially concurred with  the comments contained 
in  the  report of the PERB.  In  view  of  the  above, your application  has been  denied.  The 
names and votes of  the members of  the panel will be furnished upon  request. 

It is regretted that the circumstances of  your case are such that favorable action cannot be 
taken.  You  are entitled to have the Board  reconsider its decision upon  submission of  new 
and  material evidence or other matter not  previously considered by  the Board.  In  this 
regard,  it is important to keep in  mind  that a presumption of  regularity attaches to all official 

records.  Consequently, when applying for a correction of an  official naval record,  the 
burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or 
injustice. 

Sincerely, 

W.  DEAN PFEIFFER 
Executive Director 

Enclosure 

L
H. 

'

]

OF  THE NAW 
~

~

UARTERS U N I T E D  STATES MARINE CORPS 

3 2 8 0 d u s s ~ ~ ~ R o A D  
QUANTICO,  VIRGINIA  2 2 1 3 4 - 5 1 0 3  

~

~

~

~

~

~

IN REPLY REFER TO: 
1610 

MEMORANDUM FOR THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF 

NAVAL RECORDS 

Sub j : 

MARINE CORPS PERFORMANCE EVALUATION REVIEW BOARD  (PERB) 
ADVISO 
SERGEA 

CASE OF STAFF 

SMC 

Ref: 

(a) SSgt 
(b) MCO 

D  Form 149 of 1 Mar 99 

1-5 

1.  Per MCO 1610.11C, the Performance Evaluation Review Board, 
with three members present, met on 29 April 1999 to consider 
Staff Sergeant 
Removal of the=eport 
(AN) was requested.  Reference  (b) is the performance evaluation 
directive governing submission of the report. 

petition contained in reference (a). 
for the period 910524 to 911231 

2.  The petitioner indicates he quickly recovered from the;, 
mistake documented on the report and asks that it be removdd so 
he may continue to compete with his peers. 

3.  In its proceedings, the PERB concluded that the report is 
both administratively correct and procedurally complete as 
written and filed.  Succinctly stated, it correctly documents the 
petitioner's conviction of Driving Under the Influence.  The 
Board emphasizes itts position that it cannot and does not 
operate under the premise that factually accurate fitness reports 
should be removed simply to enhance competitiveness.  To do so 
would breach the integrity and viability of the entire perform- 
ance evaluation system. 

4.  The Board's  opinion, based on deliberation and secret ballot 
vote, is that t 
of Staff Sergea 

fitness report should remain a part 
official military record. 

5.  The case is forwarded for final action. 

Chairperson, Perfo~mance 
Evaluation Review Board 
Personnel Management Division 
Manpower and Reserve Affairs 
Department 
By direction of the Commandant 
of the Marine Eorps 



Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 02992-99

    Original file (02992-99.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    It is noted that the Commandant of the Marine Corps (CMC) has modified the contested fitness report by completely eliminating the reviewing officer's certification. 'ARTMENT OF T H E NAVY HEADQUARTERS U N I T E D STATES MARINE CORPS 3280 R U S S E L L ROAD QUANTICO, VIRGINIA 22 1 3 4 - 5 1 0 3 1610 MAY - 3 1999 MEMORANDUM FOR THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOhtid FOR CORRECTION OF IN REPLY REFER TO: NAVAL RECORDS Subj : MARINE CORPS PERFORMANCE EVALUATION REVIEW BOARD (PERB) ADVISORY OPINION ON...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 03129-99

    Original file (03129-99.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the report of the Headquarters Marine Corps Performance Evaluation Review Board (PERB), dated 7 May 1999, a copy of which is attached. Notwithstanding the petitioner's statement and the letter from the Reporting Senior, the Board is not convinced that the 1...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 02799-99

    Original file (02799-99.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    In addition, the Board considered the report of the Headquarters Marine Corps Perfofmance Evaluation Review Board (PERB), dated 25 April 1999, a copy of which is attached. Subj: MARINE CORPS PERFORMANCE EVALUATION REVIEW BOARD (PERB) ADVISORY OPINION ON BCNR APPLICATION IN THE CASE OF GUNNERY SERGEA c. Contrary to the petitioner's argument, the Board does not view the report as focusing on "one isolated incident." d. While the observations of Sergea Roundtree are certainly supportive and c...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 03415-99

    Original file (03415-99.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that favorable action cannot be taken. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of p--+able material error or injustice.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 01967-99

    Original file (01967-99.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. Per MCO 1610.11C, the Performance Evaluation Review Board, with three members resent, met on 16 March 1999 to consider Staff Sergean A t i t i o n contained in reference (a). Reference (b) is the performance evaluation directive governing submission of the report.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 01797-99

    Original file (01797-99.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the report of the Headquarters Marine Corps Performance Evaluation Review Board (PERB), dated 15 March 1999, a copy of which is attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 03760-99

    Original file (03760-99.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    In addition, the Board considered the report of the Headquarters Marine Corps (HQMC) Performance Evaluation Review Board (PERB), dated 7 June 1999, and the memorandum furnished by HQMC dated 25 August 1999, copies of which are attached. c. First Sergean explanations into is no excuse for Officer and Adverse Sighting Officer. Contrary to the information included in subparagraph 3b of reference (b), further research indicates that the Adverse Sighting Officer (Lieutenant Colone fitness...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 05106-99

    Original file (05106-99.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. Sincerely, W. DEAN PFEIFFER Executive Director Enclosure DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY H E A D Q U A R T E R S U N I T E D S T A T E S M A R I N E C O R P S 3280 RUSSELL R O A D Q U A N T I C O , V I R G I N I A 22 134-5 1 0 3 IN R E P L Y R E F E R TO: 1610 MMER/PERB MEMORANDUM FOR THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 02794-99

    Original file (02794-99.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. by the Board. In this regard, the Board emphasizes that official SRB counseling entries and Subj: MARINE CORPS PERFORMANCE EVALUATION REVIEW BOARD (PERB) CASE OF STAFF performance counseling/feedback are two separate and distinct administrative actions.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 00130-99

    Original file (00130-99.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Your allegations of error and injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. S u b j : MARINE CORPS PERFORMANCE EVALUATION REVIEW BOARD (PERB) HE CASE OF USMC The case is forwarded for final action.