DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
2 NAW ANNEX
WASHINGTON DC 203704100
JRE
Docket No: 1711-98
15 March 1999
This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the
provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552.
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive
M arch 1999. Your allegations of error and
session, considered your application on 11
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures
applicable to the proceedings of this Board.
consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your
naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.
Documentary material considered by the Board
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the
evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or
injustice.
The Board found that you reenlisted in the Navy on 25 July 1975. You were discharged on
8 April 1977 by reason of physical disability, due to an orthopedic condition. You were
awarded a general discharge because you had received nonjudicial punishment during your
enlistment for a lengthy unauthorized absence, and your military behavior average was below
the minimum required for an honorable discharge.
The Board was not persuaded that you suffered from post traumatic stress disorder at the
time of your discharge, or any other condition that significantly mitigated or extenuated the
misconduct which resulted in your failing to qualify for an honorable discharge.
Accordingly, your application has been denied.
panel will be furnished upon request.
The names and votes of the members of the
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that favorable action cannot be
taken. You are entitled to have the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new
and material evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board. In this
regard, it is important to keep in mind that a presumption of regularity attaches to all official
records. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the
burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or
injustice.
Sincerely,
W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 06156-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 15 July 2009. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with ali material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 05807-05
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.The Board found that you enlisted in the Navy on 28 June 1998. Effective 13 November 1999, the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 02616-07
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 10 April 2008. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 03420-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 5 September 2002. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and Board. of your application, together with all material submitted in Documentary material considered by the Board consisted procedures.applicable to the proceedings of this Your allegations of error and support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 007176-0
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 14 March 2001. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. The Board thus concluded that there is no error or injustice in your reenlistment code. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 03654-09
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all Material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. However, by a vote of two to one, the ADB recommended that the discharge be suspended for 12 months. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | Document scanned on Tue Oct 03 10_03_30 CDT 2000
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 8 April 1999. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 01135-09
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Nevertheless, the Board found that these factors were not sufficient to warrant changing...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR1908 13
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction: of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 6 November 2013. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted ef your application, together with all material submitted in Support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 08319-07
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.You enlisted in the Navy on 3 June 1999 at age 18. Nevertheless, the Board found that these factors...