Search Decisions

Decision Text

CG | BCMR | SRBs | 2009.022
Original file (2009.022.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY 

BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS 

 
Application for the Correction of 
the Coast Guard Record of: 
 
                                                                                        BCMR Docket No. 2009-022 
 
XXXXXXX. 
xxxxxx, BM3/E-4 

FINAL DECISION 

 

 
 

 

 

 

This is a proceeding under the provisions of section 1552 of title 10 and section 425 of 
title 14 of the United States Code.  The Chair docketed the case on November 14, 2008, upon 
receipt of the applicant’s completed application, and assigned it to staff members D. Hale and  
J. Andrews to prepare the decision for the Board as required by 33 C.F.R. § 52.61(c). 
 
 
ed members who were designated to serve as the Board in this case. 
 

This final decision, dated July 16, 2009, is approved and signed by the three duly appoint-

APPLICANT’S REQUEST AND ALLEGATIONS 

The  applicant,  a  boatswain’s  mate,  third  class  (BM3),  in  the  Coast  Guard,  asked  the 
Board to correct his record to show that he is entitled to a $2,000 enlistment bonus for enlisting 
in the Coast Guard on October 16, 2007, and agreeing to serve in the BM rate.  He alleged that 
his Coast Guard recruiter promised him a $2,000 bonus but that the Coast Guard refused to pay 
him  the  bonus.    In  support  of  his  allegation,  the  applicant  submitted  a  copy  of  his  Record  of 
Military  Processing,  which  states  in  block  32.a.  that  he  was  enlisting  for  a  “$2,000.00  AD 
affiliation bonus.”  

 
In support of his allegation, the applicant also submitted an email from his Coast Guard 
recruiter, a first class petty officer, dated August 29, 2008, who apologized to the applicant for 
erroneously  promising  him  a  bonus  and  explained  that  “there  is  no  active  duty  bonus  with  a 
guaranteed ‘A’ school…”1 

 

SUMMARY OF THE RECORD 

The applicant enlisted in the Coast Guard Reserve (Delayed Entry Program) on October 
5, 2007, and in the regular Coast Guard on October 16, 2007, for a period of four years, through 
October 15, 2011.  His record contains his Record of Military Processing (DD Form 1966), and 

                                                 
1 “A” School is where Coast Guard members receive training for their specific skill rating. 

annexes A, D, and I.  Block 32.a. of DD Form 1966 is labeled “Specific Option/Program Enlisted 
For” and shows that he was promised a $2,000 active duty affiliation bonus.   
 

VIEWS OF THE COAST GUARD 

On April 6, 2009, the Judge Advocate General (JAG) of the Coast Guard submitted an 
advisory  opinion  and  recommended  that  the  Board  grant  relief.    The  JAG  stated  that 
COMDTINST M1000.6A, Article 3.A.9., stipulates the annex on which affiliation bonuses are 
memorialized,  and  that  under  Article  3.A.3.2.  of  the  Coast  Guard  Personnel  Manual,  the 
applicant was eligible for the bonus because he agreed to enlist in the Coast Guard for four years 
and attend BM Class "A" school.   
 

APPLICANT’S RESPONSE TO THE VIEWS OF THE COAST GUARD 

 
 
On April 10, 2009, the Chair sent the applicant a copy of the JAG’s advisory opinion and 
invited him to respond within thirty days.  The applicant responded on June 18, 2009, and agreed 
with the Coast Guard’s recommendation.  

 

APPLICABLE REGULATIONS 

 

Article  3.A.1.  of  the  Coast  Guard  Personnel  Manual  states  that  the  enlistment  bonus 
program is an incentive to attract qualified personnel to critical skills or ratings to help meet the 
Coast Guard’s recruiting goals.  The program applies to new enlistees. 

 
Article  3.A.3.  of  the  manual  states  that  enlistment  bonuses  are  linked  to  a  member's 
recruitment and affiliation with a critical rating by attending a guaranteed Class "A" school or 
participating in a guaranteed “Striker” program in that rating.   
 

Article 3.A.9. of the manual provides the enlistment bonus agreements (Annexes T, T.1 
and T.2) that document the eligibility criteria and conditions under which an enlistment bonus is 
paid.  Annex T, paragraph 1 states: 

 
I  have  been  offered  an  Enlistment  Bonus  of  $___________  to  affiliate  with  the 
________rating.    In  order  to  affiliate  with  this  rating,  I  have  either  been  offered  a 
guaranteed Class “A” school or I am a prior service member who is already qualified in 
the skill/rating in accordance with eligibility criteria established by the Coast Guard. 

FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS 

The Board makes the following findings and conclusions on the basis of the applicant's 

 
 
military record and submissions, the Coast Guard's submissions, and applicable law: 
 

1.  The Board has jurisdiction concerning this matter pursuant to 10 U.S.C. § 1552.  The 

 

 

application was timely. 
 

2.  The Board finds that the applicant’s recruiter promised him a $2,000 enlistment bonus 
and memorialized that promise on the applicant’s Record of Military Processing.  However, the 
Coast Guard, without explanation, refused to pay the bonus. 
 

3.  The JAG admitted and the Board finds that the Coast Guard committed an error by 
refusing to pay the applicant the enlistment bonus to which he was entitled under Article 3.A.3.2. 
of the Personnel Manual.  In this regard, the Board notes that the JAG admitted, and the Board 
agreed, that the applicant met the eligibility criteria for the enlistment bonus because he enlisted 
in the Coast Guard for four years in a critical rating and completed BM Class “A” School. 
 

4.  Accordingly,  the  applicant’s  request  should  be  granted.  The  Coast  Guard  should 
correct the applicant’s record to show that he is entitled to receive a $2,000 enlistment bonus for 
signing a four-year enlistment contract on October 16, 2007. 

 

 
 

[ORDER AND SIGNATURES APPEAR ON NEXT PAGE]

The application of XXXXXXXX, xxxxxxx, USCG, for correction of his military record 

ORDER 

 

is granted as follows: 

 
  The  Coast  Guard  shall  correct  his  record  to  show  that  he  is  entitled  to  the  $2,000 
enlistment  bonus  he  was  promised  for  signing  a  four-year  enlistment  contract  on  October  16, 
2007, and shall pay him any amount due as a result of this correction. 

 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

        

 
 Lillian Cheng 

 

 

 
 Nancy L. Friedman 

 

 

 
 Vicki J. Ray 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



Similar Decisions

  • CG | BCMR | Other Cases | 2008-124

    Original file (2008-124.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The JAG admitted that the record “does document that Applicant was advised in an Annex “T” form (CG-3301T) dated 13 May 2007, that he was eligible for a $6,000 enlistment bonus for college credit.” However, the JAG alleged, the Annex “T” was “invalid, erroneous, and unauthorized” because Article 3.A.2.3. 2005-117, the applicant stated that he was promised a $4,000 SELRES enlistment bonus by his recruiter. Although the JAG recommended only that the Board make the contract voidable, the...

  • CG | BCMR | Other Cases | 2007-207

    Original file (2007-207.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    2005-117, the applicant stated that he was promised a $4000 SELRES enlistment bonus by his recruiter. Section B of the applicant’s enlistment contract incorporates the Page 7 documenting his eligibility for a $6,000 SELRES bonus. However, the applicant’s recruiter promised him the $6,000 bonus for enlisting, and the applicant has already given consideration on the contract by enlisting in the SELRES.

  • CG | BCMR | Other Cases | 2007-006

    Original file (2007-006.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Board finds that the Coast Guard erred when the recruiter promised the applicant that he would receive a $2000 enlistment bonus because of his prior military service. "1 The Coast Guard recommended that the Board offer the applicant the choice of having his enlistment contract voided and being discharged from the Coast Guard, or having his record show that he was entitled only to the $5000 enlistment bonus for his college credit. However, the applicant’s recruiter promised him both the...

  • CG | BCMR | Other Cases | 2008-005

    Original file (2008-005.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    1999-027, the applicant had been promised a Reserve enlistment bonus by her recruiter. Although the JAG rec- ommended only that the Board make the contract voidable, the Board granted relief, finding that the recruiter had promised the applicant the bonus as an enticement to enlist and that, “whenever reasonable, such promises should be kept, especially when the member relies on the erroneous advice and gives due consideration for the promised benefit.” In BCMR Docket No. Although the...

  • CG | BCMR | Other Cases | 2008-078

    Original file (2008-078.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    1999-027, the applicant had been promised a Reserve enlistment bonus by her recruiter. 2005-117, the applicant stated that he was promised a $4000 SELRES enlistment bonus by his recruiter. In addition, if he meets or has met the participation standards under Chapter 4 of the Reserve Policy Manual during the year following his completion of MST “A” School, his record shall be corrected to show that he is eligible for and entitled to the second half of the $5,000 SELRES enlistment bonus he...

  • CG | BCMR | SRBs | 2008-078

    Original file (2008-078.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    1999-027, the applicant had been promised a Reserve enlistment bonus by her recruiter. 2005-117, the applicant stated that he was promised a $4000 SELRES enlistment bonus by his recruiter. In addition, if he meets or has met the participation standards under Chapter 4 of the Reserve Policy Manual during the year following his completion of MST “A” School, his record shall be corrected to show that he is eligible for and entitled to the second half of the $5,000 SELRES enlistment bonus he...

  • CG | BCMR | Other Cases | 2008-196

    Original file (2008-196.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The JAG noted that under ALCOAST 064/07, the applicant was not entitled to an enlistment bonus because he had previously served in the military, and ALCOAST 064/07 states that bonuses were not available to enlistees with prior military service. 2005-117, the applicant stated that he was promised a $4,000 SELRES enlistment bonus by his recruiter. In addition, if he meets or has met the participation standards under Chapter 4 of the Reserve Policy Manual during the year following his...

  • CG | BCMR | Other Cases | 2007-214

    Original file (2007-214.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The JAG admitted the record “does document that Applicant was advised in an Enlistment Package Check-Off List for a $6,000 enlistment bonus, in a Reservation Request for a $6,000 enlistment bonus, and in an Administrative Remarks (CG-3307) dated 08 March 2007, that he was eligible for a $6,000 SELRES enlistment bonus based upon ALCOAST 056/06.” The JAG stated that under ALCOAST 056/06, only members enlisting in a critical rating were eligible for the bonus, and PS3 was not cited as a...

  • CG | BCMR | Other Cases | 2007-151

    Original file (2007-151.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    2007-119, the applicant had been promised a $4000 SELRES bonus for enlisting in the BM rating. The Board finds that the Coast Guard committed an error when the applicant’s recruiter promised him in writing that he would receive a $4000 SELRES bonus for signing a six-year enlistment contract on April 4, 2006. The Page 7 signed by the recruiter and the applicant on April 3, 2006, clearly states that the applicant is eligible to receive a $4000 SELRES bonus.

  • CG | BCMR | SRBs | 2011-221

    Original file (2011-221.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    2011-221 SUMMARY OF THE RECORD The applicant, a boatswain’s mate second class (BM2), in the Coast Guard Selected Reserve (SELRES) asked the Board to correct his record to show that he is eligible to receive the $4,000 enlistment bonus that he was promised for signing an 8-year Reserve enlistment contract and agreeing to serve in the BM rate. The JAG stated that although the applicant was not eligible for a bonus under the applicable ALCOAST, he should nonetheless receive the bonus because...