DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
Application for Correction of
the Coast Guard Record of:
BCMR Docket No. 2004-193
FINAL DECISION
Author: Hale, D.
This is a proceeding under the provisions of section 1552 of title 10 and section
425 of title 14 of the United States Code. It was docketed on September 24, 2004, upon
the BCMR’s receipt of the applicant’s request for correction.
members who were designated to serve as the Board in this case.
This final decision, dated May 19, 2005, is signed by the three duly appointed
APPLICANT’S REQUEST AND ALLEGATIONS
The applicant asked the Board to correct his military record to show that he
enlisted in the Regular Coast Guard on November 3, 1998, for four years, rather than
six, and then reenlisted on November 3, 2002, for six years, to receive a Zone A SRB.
The applicant alleged that his Coast Guard records erroneously indicate that he enlisted
for six years on November 3, 1998.
SUMMARY OF THE APPLICANT’S RECORD
The applicant enlisted in the Coast Guard Reserve on April 20, 1998, for a period
of eight years under the Delayed Entry/Enlistment Program (DEP).1 The enlistment
contract, DD Form 4/1, states that the applicant would be ordered to active duty as a
reservist, unless he enlisted in the Regular Coast Guard prior to November 24, 1998, for
a term of at least six years
1 The DEP allows recruits to enlist in the Coast Guard but postpone training for up to 365 days.
On November 3, 1998, the applicant was discharged from the DEP and
immediately enlisted into the Regular Coast Guard. The applicant’s contract, DD Form
4/3, indicates in Block 20a that he was requesting “to be discharged from the DEP and
enlisted in the Regular Component of the Coast Guard for a period of 4 years.” The
applicant did not sign this particular section of the contract. However, his signature
does appear at the bottom of the contract, confirming the enlistment. The applicant was
enlisted at the pay grade of E-2 pursuant to the Recruit Referral Program, under which
a recruit who caused two other people to enlist in the Coast Guard would be enlisted as
an E-2.
The applicant’s Record of Military Processing form (FF Form 1966/1) indicates
that the applicant enlisted on active duty on November 3, 1998, for a term of four years.
The Coast Guard’s military processing and recruiting databases also indicate that the
applicant enlisted in the Regular Coast Guard on November 3, 1998, for a term of four
years.
The applicant’s Coast Guard record also contains a Statement of Understanding,
signed by the applicant and his recruiter, which states that he was guaranteed
assignment to the Electronic Technician (ET) Class “A” school,2 convening on February
1, 1999.
The applicant’s fourth anniversary on active duty, November 3, 2002, passed
without any extension, of his original enlistment or reenlistment. On April 29, 2003, the
applicant extended his enlistment for four years to obligate additional service for a
transfer to Hawaii. The four-year extension contract indicates that the applicant’s new
EOE was November 2, 2008. The record indicates that he was counseled that he would
receive a Zone A SRB with a multiple of 3.5 computed with 48 months of newly
obligated service. However, he apparently did not receive the SRB.
VIEWS OF THE COAST GUARD
On February 14, 2005, the Judge Advocate General (JAG) of the Coast Guard
submitted an advisory opinion recommending that the Board grant the applicant’s
request. He based his recommendation on a memorandum on the case prepared by the
Coast Guard Personnel Command (CGPC), who relied upon a memorandum prepared
by the Coast Guard Recruiting Command (CGRC).
The JAG stated that the applicant’s enlistment package reveals numerous
discrepancies, and that “it is impossible to prove precisely what [the] Applicant’s and
2 Class “A” School is the Coast Guard’s advanced training school where members are trained in their
chosen specialty (rate). Class “A” schools range in length from five weeks to five months, depending on
the career field.
the Coast Guard’s intentions were regarding the length of Applicant’s initial
enlistment.” However, the JAG agreed with CGPC’s determination that it was the
intent of the Coast Guard to enlist the applicant into the Regular Coast Guard for a term
of four years on November 3, 1998, at the pay grade of E-2. In addition, the JAG
recommended that the applicant’s record be corrected to indicate that he reenlisted on
November 3, 2002, for a term of six years and is therefore entitled to a Zone A SRB.
Finally, the JAG recommended that the Board void the applicant’s April 29, 2003,
extension contract.
APPLICANT’S RESPONSE TO THE VIEWS OF THE COAST GUARD
On February 24, 2005, the Chair sent a copy of the views of the Coast Guard to
the applicant and invited him to respond within 30 days. The letter was returned to the
Chair by the U.S. Post Office because the applicant had moved and the Post Office did
not have a forwarding address on file.
APPLICABLE LAW
Article 2.D.2.b. of the Coast Guard Recruiting Manual states that pending
enlistment in the Regular Coast Guard, individuals will be enlisted in the Coast Guard
Reserve for a period of eight years.
Article 2.D.2.e. of the Recruiting Manual states that within 12 months of entering
the program, a DEP enlistee shall be enlisted in the Regular Coast Guard for four or six
years provided he remains fully qualified.
Article 3.G.1. of the Recruiting Manual establishes the procedures for processing
recruits with a guaranteed “A” school. There is no requirement for a six-year
obligation.
Article 3.G.4. of the Recruiting Manual states that DEP designees with no prior
service who cause two other non-prior service applicants to enlist in the Coast Guard or
the Coast Guard Reserve shall be enlisted in pay grade E-2.
ALCOAST 329/02 was issued on July 3, 2002, and was in effect from August 5,
2002, through June 30, 2003. Under ALCOAST 329/02, ET2s were eligible for an SRB
calculated with a multiple of 3.5.
FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS
The Board makes the following findings and conclusions on the basis of the
applicant's military record and submissions, the Coast Guard's submission, and appli-
cable law:
§ 1552. The application was timely filed.
The Board has jurisdiction concerning this matter pursuant to 10 U.S.C.
1.
2.
The JAG stated that there are numerous discrepancies in the applicant’s
enlistment package, but that the records indicate that the Coast Guard intended to enlist
the applicant in the Regular Coast Guard for a period of four years on November 3,
1998, at the pay grade of E-2. The Board agrees. Although the applicant’s enlistment
contract states that unless he enlisted before November 24, 1998, for no less than six
years, he would be ordered to active duty as a reservist, and although the applicant
apparently did not attempt to reenlist after he completed four years of service, the
preponderance of the evidence in the record suggests that the Coast Guard intended to
enlist him for four years. The Board notes that the applicant was discharged from the
DEP on November 3, 1998, and immediately enlisted in the Regular Coast Guard for
four years, pursuant to Article 2.D.2.e. of the Recruiting Manual. In addition, there are
a host of other documents in the applicant’s Coast Guard record that convince the
Board that it was the intent of the applicant and the Coast Guard to enlist the applicant
for a term of four years on November 3, 1998. The Board reaches this conclusion even
though the applicant’s April 29, 2003, extension contract suggests that the applicant and
the Coast Guard were operating on the belief that he had enlisted in the Coast Guard
for a term of six years. However, despite these discrepancies, there is sufficient
documentation in the record to satisfy the Board that it was the intent of the applicant
and the Coast Guard to enlist him for a term of four years on November 3, 1998.
3.
The applicant was enlisted at the pay grade of E-2 because he caused two
other people to enlist in the Coast Guard. Pursuant to Article 3.G.4. of the Recruiting
Manual, applicants with no prior service who cause two other non-prior service
applicants to enlist in the Coast Guard or the Coast Guard Reserve shall be enlisted in
pay grade E-2. The article does not state that the enlistee must enlist for a specific
number of years to obtain the pay grade increase.
4.
The applicant was promised the Class “A” school for his rating when he
enlisted in the DEP. Article 3.G.1. of the Recruiting Manual establishes the procedures
for processing recruits with a guaranteed “A” school, and it does not state that there is
minimum term of enlistment for recruits who are guaranteed assignment to a particular
“A” school.
5.
The applicant has proven by a preponderance of the evidence that he
enlisted for a term of four years on November 3, 1998, and was eligible to reenlist on
November 2, 2002, to receive Zone A SRB.
6.
Accordingly, relief should be granted by correcting the record to show
that the applicant enlisted for four years on November 3, 1998, and that he reenlisted on
November 2, 2002, for six years to receive a Zone A SRB.
ORDER
The military record of ___________________, shall be corrected to show that he
enlisted in the Regular Coast Guard on November 3, 1998, for a term of four years at the
pay grade of E-2, and that he reenlisted on November 3, 2002, for a period of six years
and is eligible for a Zone A SRB. His four-year extension contract dated April 29, 2003,
shall be removed from his record as null and void. The Coast Guard shall pay him any
amounts due under ALCOAST 329/02 as a result of these corrections.
George A. Weller
Dorothy J. Ulmer
William R. Kraus
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS Application for the Correction of the Coast Guard Record of: XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX. This final decision, dated April 21, 2005, is signed by the three duly appointed APPLICANT’S REQUEST AND ALLEGATIONS The applicant asked the Board to correct his record by replacing his October 1, 2002, six-year extension contract with a reenlistment contract to receive a selective reenlistment bonus (SRB)1 in accordance with ALCOAST...
The Coast Guard erred when it counseled the applicant that he was eligible to receive a Zone B SRB for signing a six-year reenlistment contract on January 31, 2002. of the Personnel Manual, which show that a member’s SRB equals his monthly basic pay, multiplied by the SRB multiple authorized under the ALCOAST in effect, multiplied the number of months of service newly obligated under the contract, and divided by 12, if the appli- cant had reenlisted for four years on this 6th anniversary...
This final decision, dated May 29, 2008, is approved and signed by the three duly APPLICANT’S REQUEST AND ALLEGATIONS The applicant, a first class gunner’s mate (GM1/E-6), asked the Board to correct his record to show that he reenlisted for six years on both his sixth and tenth active duty anniversa- ries to receive Zone A and Zone B selective reenlistment bonuses (SRBs).1 The applicant alleged that on November 16, 2006, he learned from his unit’s yeoman that he had been eligible to receive...
The applicant alleged that when he signed a six-year extension contract on May 1, 2003, he was counseled that he would receive an SRB with a multiple of 2.5. The Board also finds that if the applicant had been properly counseled at the time of his May 1, 2003, reenlistment, he would have had the following options: Reenlist as he did for an SRB with a multiple of 2.0 under ALCOAST 329/02; a. b. c. Be discharged from the Coast Guard. of the Personnel Manual, and at the termination of said...
This final decision, dated March 31, 2005, is signed by the three duly appointed APPLICANT’S REQUEST AND ALLEGATIONS The applicant, an operations specialist second class (OS2), asked the Board to correct his military record to make him entitled to a Zone A selective reenlistment bonus (SRB) calculated with a multiple of 2.1 He alleged that, prior to being transferred to his current station on July 7, 2003, he was not properly counseled about his eligibility for an SRB when he signed a...
By that time, ALCOAST 182/03 was in effect and the SRB multiple for MK2s in Zone A was just 1.5.5 In support of his allegations, the applicant pointed out that his command failed to have him sign a CG-3307 (“page 7”) to acknowledge receiving proper SRB counseling when he signed the one-year extension contract on November 18, 2002. Therefore, the Board finds that the applicant has proved by a preponderance of the evidence that he was miscounseled in November 2002 that, if he extended...
This final decision, dated November 12, 2004, is signed by the three duly APPLICANT’S REQUEST AND ALLEGATIONS The applicant asked the Board to correct his record to show that he is entitled to a selective reenlistment bonus (SRB) calculated with a multiple of 3.5, instead of the multiple of 2.5 that he received for signing a six-year reenlistment contract on March 21, 2004. When he executed the extension contract, the applicant was counseled that he was eligible to receive a Zone B SRB with...
Coast Guard members who have at least 21 months but no more than 6 years of active duty service are in “Zone A.” Members who have completed at least 6 years but no more than 10 years of active duty service are in “Zone B.” Members may not receive more than one bonus per zone. On July 1, 1999, after receiving transfer orders to a new station, the applicant was advised that an SRB multiple was authorized for his rating and that if he reenlisted or extended his enlistment for at least three...
Coast Guard members who have less than 6 of active duty service are in “Zone A.” Article 3.C., Coast Guard Personnel Manual. TJAG stated that in an effort to afford the applicant a result that most closely represents the bargain she claimed, the Coast Guard recommended that the Board offer her two options: First, Applicant could have her record corrected by voiding her reenlistment contract dated 3 June 2003 and subsequently extending her period of service until the BCMR final decision. ...
The applicant, who was a reservist on extended active duty (EAD)2 at the time of her enlistment/reenlistment into the regular Coast Guard, alleged that she is entitled to the SRB because her previous active duty service causes her enlistment to be characterized as a reenlistment. The enlistment of Coast Guard Reserve personnel who are serving on extended active duty and who have served on extended active duty for 12 months or more shall be considered a reenlistment.” member must meet the...