Search Decisions

Decision Text

CG | BCMR | SRBs | 2003-128
Original file (2003-128.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY 

BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS 

 
Application for the Correction of 
the Coast Guard Record of: 

Xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 

FINAL DECISION 
BCMR Docket No. 2003-128 

SUMMARY OF THE RECORD 

 

 

The applicant asked the Board to correct his record to show that he reenlisted for 6 years 
on  his  10th  active  duty  anniversary,  July  7,  2003,  to  receive  a  Zone  B  selective  reenlistment 
bonus (SRB) in accordance with ALCOAST 182/03.  He alleged that he was not timely coun-
seled  about  his  eligibility  for  the  SRB  and  that,  if  he  had  been,  he  would  have  reenlisted.  A 
yeoman from the applicant’s command signed a statement indicating that she failed to verify 
his 10th anniversary and did not counsel him about the SRB opportunity until the anniversary 
had  passed.    His  record  does  not  contain  documentation  of  SRB  counseling  prior  to  his  10th 
anniversary.   
 

The Judge Advocate General of the Coast Guard recommended that the Board grant the 
applicant’s request because the record supports his allegation that he was not timely counseled. 
 

FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS  

Under  Article  3.C.  of  the  Personnel  Manual,  the  applicant  was  entitled  to  timely 
counseling concerning his eligibility for an SRB on his 10th anniversary.  Under Article 3.C. and 
ALCOAST  182/03,  he  was  eligible  to  reenlist  for  6  years  to  receive  a  Zone  B  SRB  on  the 
anniversary.    The  Board  finds  that  he  was  not  timely  counseled  and  that,  if  he  had  been,  he 
would have reenlisted to receive the SRB.  Accordingly, relief should be granted.   

ORDER 

The  military  record  of  MK1  xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx,  USCG,  shall  be  corrected  to  show 
that  he  reenlisted  for  6 years on his 10th active duty anniversary to receive a Zone B SRB as 
provided under ALCOAST 182/03.  Any other reenlistment or extension contract he may have 
signed since his 10th anniversary shall be null and void.  The Coast Guard shall pay him the 
amount due as a result of this correction. 

 

 
 
 
 

 

 

 
April 29, 2004____ 
Date 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

 
 

 
 

____                      
 

 

 

              
 

 
  Jordan S. Fried 

 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 

 
  J. Carter Robertson 

 

 

 
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 

 
  Kathryn Sinniger 

 

 
 

 
 

 



Similar Decisions

  • CG | BCMR | SRBs | 2004-147

    Original file (2004-147.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    This final decision, dated February 10, 2005, is signed by the three duly APPLICANT’S REQUEST AND ALLEGATIONS The applicant asked the Board to correct his record by voiding his 4-year reenlistment contract dated May 11, 2000, and replacing it with a 4-year reenlistment contract dated February 8, 2000, to receive a 6th active duty anniversary1 Zone A selective reenlistment bonus (SRB).2 The applicant alleged that he was never counseled that he could reenlist on his 6th anniversary of active...

  • CG | BCMR | SRBs | 2007-054

    Original file (2007-054.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    3 To be eligible for a Zone B SRB, a member must have completed “at least 6 years but not more than 10 years of active service on the date of reenlistment or operative date of the extension.” Coast Guard Personnel Manual, Article 3.C.4.b.3. He stated that upon receiving transfer orders to the Coast Guard Integrated Support Command (ISC) and the Coast Guard Cutter Healy in Seattle, he was counseled by a Coast Guard yeoman1 that he was eligible to reenlist or extend for up to six years for a...

  • CG | BCMR | SRBs | 2004-079

    Original file (2004-079.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    This final decision, dated November 12, 2004, is signed by the three duly APPLICANT’S REQUEST AND ALLEGATIONS The applicant asked the Board to correct his record to show that he is entitled to a selective reenlistment bonus (SRB) calculated with a multiple of 3.5, instead of the multiple of 2.5 that he received for signing a six-year reenlistment contract on March 21, 2004. When he executed the extension contract, the applicant was counseled that he was eligible to receive a Zone B SRB with...

  • CG | BCMR | SRBs | 2005-064

    Original file (2005-064.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    of the Coast Guard Personnel Manual states that to receive a Zone A SRB, the member cannot have previously received a Zone A SRB. The counseling was erroneous because the applicant received a Zone A SRB for his September 22, 2001, reenlistment, and pursuant to Article 3.C.4.a.6. Therefore, the Board finds that if the applicant had received proper SRB counseling in accordance with Article 3.C.3., he would have (a) extended his enlistment for 23 months instead of reenlisting in July 2003 and...

  • CG | BCMR | SRBs | 2004-026

    Original file (2004-026.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Coast Guard members who have at least 21 months but no more than 6 years of active duty service are in “Zone A.” Article 3.C., Coast Guard Personnel Manual. APPLICABLE REGULATIONS Coast Guard Personnel Manual Article 3.C.3 (Written Agreements) states that "all personnel with 10 years or less active service who reenlist or extend for any period, however brief, shall be counseled on the SRB program." However, when he reenlisted, he was incorrectly advised by Coast Guard personnel that he was...

  • CG | BCMR | SRBs | 2003-113

    Original file (2003-113.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Judge Advocate General of the Coast Guard recommended that the Board grant the applicant’s request because the record supports his allegation that he was not timely counseled. Under ALDIST 184/99, he was eligible to reenlist for 3, 4, 5, or 6 years to receive a Zone A SRB with a multiple of 3. If he had done so, he would not have been eligible to reenlist for 4 years on June 13, 2000, but he would have been eligible to reenlist on his 10th anniversary for a Zone B SRB with a multiple...

  • CG | BCMR | SRBs | 2004-121

    Original file (2004-121.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    This final decision, dated December 29, 2004, is signed by the three duly APPLICANT’S REQUEST AND ALLEGATIONS The applicant asked the Board to correct his record to show that he is entitled to a Zone B selective reenlistment bonus (SRB) calculated with seventy-two months of newly obligated service.1 He alleged that he was miscounseled about his eligibility for the SRB and that if he had been properly counseled, he would have reenlisted for six years on May 13, 2003, in lieu of extending, to...

  • CG | BCMR | SRBs | 2007-210

    Original file (2007-210.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    This final decision, dated May 29, 2008, is approved and signed by the three duly APPLICANT’S REQUEST AND ALLEGATIONS The applicant, a first class gunner’s mate (GM1/E-6), asked the Board to correct his record to show that he reenlisted for six years on both his sixth and tenth active duty anniversa- ries to receive Zone A and Zone B selective reenlistment bonuses (SRBs).1 The applicant alleged that on November 16, 2006, he learned from his unit’s yeoman that he had been eligible to receive...

  • CG | BCMR | SRBs | 2007-052

    Original file (2007-052.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Board finds that the Coast Guard committed an error by not counseling the applicant on a Page 7 when he reenlisted on September 13, 1997, as required by Article 2 of Enclosure (1) to COMDINST 7220.33. The applicant alleged that he would not have reenlisted on September 13, 1997, if he had known that he was not required to do so until his enlistment expired on July 12, 1999.5 The Board finds that if the applicant had been properly counseled on September 13, 1997, he would have had the...

  • CG | BCMR | SRBs | 2009-117

    Original file (2009-117.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Coast Guard erred when it counseled the applicant that he was eligible to receive a Zone B SRB for signing a six-year reenlistment contract on January 31, 2002. of the Personnel Manual, which show that a member’s SRB equals his monthly basic pay, multiplied by the SRB multiple authorized under the ALCOAST in effect, multiplied the number of months of service newly obligated under the contract, and divided by 12, if the appli- cant had reenlisted for four years on this 6th anniversary...