Search Decisions

Decision Text

CG | BCMR | SRBs | 2003-059
Original file (2003-059.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY 

BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS 

 
Application for the Correction of 
the Coast Guard Record of: 

Xxxxxxxxxxxxxx 
xxxxxxxxxxx 

FINAL DECISION 
BCMR Docket No. 2003-059 

 

 

SUMMARY OF THE RECORD 

The applicant asked the Board to correct his record so that he would receive a selective 
reenlistment  bonus  (SRB)  based  on  a  42-month  extension  contract  he  signed on May 8, 2002, 
rather than on a 4-year extension contract that he signed on December 4, 2002.  He alleged that 
when he signed the first contract to obligate service to accept transfer orders, he was wrongly 
advised  that  he  was  ineligible  for  an  SRB.    In  addition,  when  he  signed  the  second,  longer 
extension he was not told that his SRB would be diminished by the term of service obligated 
under the first extension contract.  The applicant submitted copies of the contracts and pointed 
out that he had not signed a CG-3307 to acknowledge receipt of SRB counseling.  The first con-
tract erroneously states that he was not eligible for an SRB at the time, and the second errone-
ously states that his SRB would be based on the full 48-month term of the contract. 

 
The Chief Counsel of the Coast Guard recommended that the Board grant relief because 
the record indicates that the applicant was twice erroneously advised about his SRB eligibility.  

FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS  

Under  COMDTINST  7220.33,  the  applicant  was  entitled  to  proper  counseling 
concerning  his eligibility for an SRB.  The extension contracts he signed strongly support his 
allegations of erroneous counseling.  The Board finds that he was not properly counseled about 
his  SRB  eligibility  under  ALCOAST  585/01  in  May  2002  and  that,  if  he  had  been,  he  would 
have extended his enlistment for at least 42 months to receive the SRB, and he would not have 
canceled that extension to re-extend in December 2002.  Accordingly, relief should be granted. 

  

 

ORDER 

The military record of MK2 xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, USCG, shall be corrected to 
show  that  on  May  8,  2002,  he  extended  his  enlistment  for  at  least  42  months,  but  at  his 
discretion for a longer term of up to 72 months.  The 4-year extension contract dated December 
4, 2002, shall be removed from his record as null and void.  The Coast Guard shall pay him any 
sum owed under ALCOAST 585/01 as a result of this correction. 
 
 
August 28, 2003 
Date 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

 
 Felisa C. Garmon 

 
 
 Julia Andrews  

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 
 

 
 

 
 
 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 

 
 Dorothy J. Ulmer 

 

 

 

 

 



Similar Decisions

  • CG | BCMR | SRBs | 2003-020

    Original file (2003-020.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Coast Guard members who have at least 21 months but no more than 6 years of active duty service are in “Zone A.” Members who have completed at least 6 years but no more than 10 years of active duty service are in “Zone B.” Members may not receive more than one bonus per zone. On July 1, 1999, after receiving transfer orders to a new station, the applicant was advised that an SRB multiple was authorized for his rating and that if he reenlisted or extended his enlistment for at least three...

  • CG | BCMR | SRBs | 2005-165

    Original file (2005-165.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    of the Coast Guard Training and Education Manual, before reporting to “A” school on January 22, 2000, she needed to obligate sufficient service — 19 more months — to complete the 14 weeks of school and have 26 months remaining on her enlistment upon completion of the school.3 Therefore, the applicant is entitled to have the term of her January 20, 2000, extension contract corrected to 19 months. The Board finds that if the applicant had been properly counseled regarding her SRB eligibility,...

  • CG | BCMR | SRBs | 2002-098

    Original file (2002-098.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    This final decision, dated February 19, 2003, is signed by the three duly APPLICANT’S REQUEST AND ALLEGATIONS The applicant asked the Board to correct his record so that he would receive a selective reenlistment bonus (SRB) for the full 72 months (six years) for which he reen- listed on July 18, 2002. 2002-098 p. 2 celed the extension contract, it would still count as previously obligated service and reduce his SRB by almost half: if he reenlisted in September 2002 before the...

  • CG | BCMR | SRBs | 2003-001

    Original file (2003-001.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    This final decision, dated June 19, 2003, is signed by the three duly appointed APPLICANT’S REQUEST AND ALLEGATIONS The applicant asked the Board to correct his military record to make him entitled to a full Zone A selective reenlistment bonus (SRB)1 based on his pay grade as an MK2, rather than a partial SRB reduced by previously obligated service under an extension contract. of the Personnel Manual provides that members with less than six years of active duty will not normally be...

  • CG | BCMR | SRBs | 2002-086

    Original file (2002-086.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    This final decision, dated December 31, 2002, is signed by the three duly APPLICANT’S REQUEST AND ALLEGATIONS The applicant asked the Board to correct his military record by canceling a three- year extension contract he signed on February 20, 2002, when he was in pay grade E-4, and reenlisting him for six years as of April 2, 2002, the day after he was advanced to pay grade E-5. (1) of Enclosure (1) to the SRB Instruction, the applicant could have signed a six-year extension contract on...

  • CG | BCMR | SRBs | 2002-176

    Original file (2002-176.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    This final decision, dated June 19, 2003, is signed by the three duly appointed APPLICANT’S REQUEST AND ALLEGATIONS The applicant asked the Board to correct his military record to make him entitled to a Zone B selective reenlistment bonus (SRB)1 based on his pay grade as a BM1 and calculated with a multiple of two for the four-year reenlistment contract that he signed on June 12, 2002, upon receipt of transfer orders to a new unit. VIEWS OF THE COAST GUARD On December 23, 2002, the Chief...

  • CG | BCMR | SRBs | 2002-146

    Original file (2002-146.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    VIEWS OF THE COAST GUARD On April 25, 2003, the Chief Counsel of the Coast Guard recommended that the Board grant the applicant’s request.2 The Chief Counsel stated that the “Coast Guard concedes that this Applicant met the eligibility criteria for an SRB at the time he reenlisted on 1 July, 2002.” The Chief Counsel stated that the applicant was eligible for the SRB because he “reenlisted within 3 months after the end of his enlistment/date after separation from active duty and...

  • CG | BCMR | SRBs | 2002-168

    Original file (2002-168.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    He alleged that he was erroneously counseled that he would be able to reenlist after he was advanced to XXX, cancel his February 20, 2002 extension, and receive the Zone A SRB based on pay grade E-5. Although the applicant needed to obligate service to accept his orders to transfer in June 2002, the record indicates that he could have and with proper counseling should have waited to sign a contract until after his advancement to XXX to get a larger SRB. ORDER The military record of , USCG,...

  • CG | BCMR | SRBs | 2007-054

    Original file (2007-054.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    3 To be eligible for a Zone B SRB, a member must have completed “at least 6 years but not more than 10 years of active service on the date of reenlistment or operative date of the extension.” Coast Guard Personnel Manual, Article 3.C.4.b.3. He stated that upon receiving transfer orders to the Coast Guard Integrated Support Command (ISC) and the Coast Guard Cutter Healy in Seattle, he was counseled by a Coast Guard yeoman1 that he was eligible to reenlist or extend for up to six years for a...

  • CG | BCMR | SRBs | 2003-025

    He also requested that the Board correct his record to show that he reenlisted for six years on April 11, 20xx, his sixth active duty anniversary, to receive a Zone A selective reenlistment bonus (SRB). One of the petty officers wrote that, based on the applicant’s having four years’ prior active duty service in the Navy, he could have enlisted for two years, instead of four years but was erroneously advised by his recruiter at the time he enlisted in the Coast Guard. The applicant...