DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
Application for the Correction of
the Coast Guard Record of:
XXXXX, Xxxxxx X.
xxx xx xxxx, XXX
FINAL DECISION
BCMR Docket No. 2003-034
SUMMARY OF THE RECORD
The applicant asked the Board to correct his record to show that he reenlisted for six
years on February 26, 2002, his sixth active duty anniversary, to receive a Zone B selective
reenlistment bonus (SRB). In support of his request, the applicant submitted a signed statement
from his chief yeoman stating that he was never counseled about his eligibility to reenlist on his
six-year anniversary. The applicant alleged that had he been counseled, he would have
reenlisted for six years on his sixth anniversary.
On May 30, 2003, the Chief Counsel of the Coast Guard stated that, if the applicant met
the criteria for a Zone B SRB on the date of his sixth anniversary, the Board should grant the
requested relief. He admitted that the applicant’s record contains no page 7 documenting the
necessary counseling, as required by regulation. He recommended that the applicant’s record
be corrected to show that he reenlisted on February 26, 2002, for the purpose of receiving a
Zone B SRB pursuant to ALCOAST 585/01.
FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS
Under COMDTINST 7220.33, the applicant was entitled to proper counseling
concerning his eligibility to reenlist on his sixth active duty anniversary for an SRB. The record
indicates that the applicant met the criteria for a Zone B SRB on his sixth anniversary in that he
was serving in pay grade E-5 and had not previously received a Zone B SRB. The Board finds
the applicant’s case to be similar to that of BCMR Docket No. 2002-152, wherein the Chief
Counsel recommended identical relief for similar facts. The Board further finds that if the
applicant had been properly counseled, he would have reenlisted on February 26, 2002 for six
years to receive a Zone B SRB pursuant to ALCOAST 585/01. Accordingly, relief should be
granted.
ORDER
The application of XXX Xxxxxx X. Xxxxx, xxx xx xxxx, USCG, for correction of his
military record is granted. His record shall be corrected to show that he reenlisted for six years
on February 26, 2002 to receive a Zone B SRB calculated with a multiple of xx under ALCOAST
585/01. His March 23, 2001 extension contract for 2 years and 5 months shall be cancelled. The
Coast Guard shall pay him the amount due as a result of this correction.
August 28, 2003
Date
Julia Andrews
Felisa C. Garmon
Dorothy J. Ulmer
He also requested that the Board correct his record to show that he reenlisted for six years on April 11, 20xx, his sixth active duty anniversary, to receive a Zone A selective reenlistment bonus (SRB). One of the petty officers wrote that, based on the applicant’s having four years’ prior active duty service in the Navy, he could have enlisted for two years, instead of four years but was erroneously advised by his recruiter at the time he enlisted in the Coast Guard. The applicant...
CG | BCMR | OER and or Failure of Selection | 2003-025
He also requested that the Board correct his record to show that he reenlisted for six years on April 11, 20xx, his sixth active duty anniversary, to receive a Zone A selective reenlistment bonus (SRB). One of the petty officers wrote that, based on the applicant’s having four years’ prior active duty service in the Navy, he could have enlisted for two years, instead of four years but was erroneously advised by his recruiter at the time he enlisted in the Coast Guard. The applicant...
2002-152 SUMMARY OF THE RECORD The applicant asked the Board to correct his record to show that he reenlisted for six years on May 7, 2002, his sixth active duty anniversary, to receive a Zone B selective reenlistment bonus (SRB). He recommended that the Board grant relief by correcting the applicant’s record to show that he reenlisted on May 7, 2002, for the purpose of receiving a Zone B SRB pursuant to ALCOAST 585/01. ORDER The military record of , USCG, shall be corrected to show that...
He alleged that, if he had been properly counseled, he would have cancelled his extension, prior to its operative date, and reenlisted for six years. On December 12, 2002, the Chief Counsel of the Coast Guard stated that the applicant’s request should be granted because the record shows that he was eligible for the SRB. The Board finds that the applicant was not properly counseled, and that if he had been, he would have cancelled the extension contract he signed on March 19, 2001 and...
On December 12, 2002, the Chief Counsel of the Coast Guard recommended that the Board grant the applicant’s requested relief because the record supports the applicant’s allegation that he was improperly counseled. The Chief Counsel admits and the Board finds that the Coast Guard committed an error when it promised the applicant a Zone A SRB under ALCOAST 585/01 despite there being no multiple available therein for his rating. The Board is persuaded that had the applicant known that he was...
On September 10, 2003, the Chief Counsel of the Coast Guard stated that although the record indicates that the applicant was a qualified boats coxswain and the page 7 entry was issued in error, granting the requested relief would not provide the applicant with an opportunity to obtain a Zone B SRB. He recommended that the Board grant alternative relief by correcting the applicant’s record to show that in accordance with ALCOAST 127/01, he reenlisted for six years on December 2, 2001, his...
2002-120 SUMMARY OF THE RECORD The applicant asked the Board to correct his record to show that he reenlisted for 6 years, rather than for 4 years, on April 28, 2002, his 10th anniversary on active duty. He alleged that had he been properly counseled, he would have reenlisted for 6 years in order for his SRB to be computed upon 48 months. On November 29, 2002, the Chief Counsel of the Coast Guard recommended that the Board grant the applicant’s request because the record supports his...
He alleged that pursuant to Coast Guard regulations, his command should have counseled him that he could receive a Zone B SRB under ALCOAST 127/01 by reenlisting during the three months prior to January 22, 20xx, his sixth active duty anniversary. The CWO wrote that if the applicant had been aware that he could have reenlisted three months prior to his six-year anniversary, “he would receive an SRB payment, regardless of his selection to [xxxxxx xxxxxx].” The applicant also submitted a...
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS Application for the Correction of the Coast Guard Record of: XXXXXX, XXXXXX X. XXX XX XXXX, XXX FINAL DECISION BCMR Docket No. 2002-021 SUMMARY OF THE RECORD The applicant asked the Board to correct his record to show that he reenlisted for six years on November 17, 2000, instead of extending his enlistment on that day for six years to receive a Zone A selective reenlistment bonus (SRB) pursuant to ALCOAST 218/00. On May...
This final decision, dated September 12, 2002 is signed by the three duly APPLICANT’S REQUEST AND ALLEGATIONS The applicant asked the Board to correct his record to show that he was discharged, and immediately reenlisted for a period of six years on his tenth anniversary of military service1 for the purpose of receiving a Zone B selective reenlistment bonus (SRB). (1) of Enclosure (1) to the Commandant Instruction 7220.33 (Reenlistment Bonus Programs Administration) states that members with...