Search Decisions

Decision Text

CG | BCMR | SRBs | 2001-109
Original file (2001-109.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS 

 

 

Final Decision 
BCMR No.  2001-109 

 
Application for the Correction of 
the Coast Guard Record of: 

XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX 
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX 
 

 

SUMMARY OF THE RECORD 

ULMER, Chair: 
 
 
The applicant, a machinery technician first class (MK1; pay grade E-6), asked the Board 
to  correct  his  record  to  show that he reenlisted for six years on June 11, 2001, his tenth year 
anniversary  on  active  duty,  to  obtain  a  Zone  B  SRB  (selective  reenlistment  bonus).    The 
applicant stated that his yeoman incorrectly counseled him that he could reenlist either three 
months before or three months after his tenth year anniversary date to obtain the SRB.  Several 
days after his tenth anniversary date, the applicant inquired about reenlisting but was told he 
could  not  reenlist  because  his  anniversary  date  had  passed.    (According  to  regulation,  the 
reenlistment must occur on or within three months of the tenth anniversary date.) 
 

The Chief Counsel of the Coast Guard stated that the applicant was eligible for the SRB. 
He admitted that there is no page 7 in the applicant’s record documenting the necessary SRB 
counseling,  as  required  by  regulation.  He  recommended  that  the  Board  grant  relief,  if  the 
applicant provides satisfactory evidence corroborating his allegation of error.  The yeoman who 
provided  the  incorrect  advice  wrote  a  statement  corroborating  the  applicant’s  allegation  of 
error. 
 

FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS  

The  Board  finds  that  the  applicant  has  submitted  persuasive  evidence  that  the  Coast 
Guard committed an error by erroneously advising the applicant that he could reenlist within 
three months after his tenth anniversary on active duty to obtain an SRB.  The Coast Guard also 
failed  to  document  its  counseling  on  a  page  7  as  required  by  regulation.  Accordingly,  the 
applicant should be granted relief. 
 

ORDER 

The  application  of  XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX,  USCG,  for  correction  of  his  military 
record is granted.  His record shall be corrected to show that he reenlisted for six years on June 
11,  2001,  his  tenth  anniversary  on  active  duty,  to  obtain  a  Zone  B  SRB  with  the  appropriate 
multiple, pursuant to ALCOAST 127/01. The Coast Guard shall pay the applicant the amount 
due him as a result of this correction. 

 

 

 
__May 16, 2002__________________   
Date 
 
 
 
 

 

 

 

 

 
Robert C. Ashby 

 

 

 

 

 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 

 
David H. Kasminoff 

 

 

 
Sherri L. Pappas 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



Similar Decisions

  • CG | BCMR | SRBs | 2007-210

    Original file (2007-210.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    This final decision, dated May 29, 2008, is approved and signed by the three duly APPLICANT’S REQUEST AND ALLEGATIONS The applicant, a first class gunner’s mate (GM1/E-6), asked the Board to correct his record to show that he reenlisted for six years on both his sixth and tenth active duty anniversa- ries to receive Zone A and Zone B selective reenlistment bonuses (SRBs).1 The applicant alleged that on November 16, 2006, he learned from his unit’s yeoman that he had been eligible to receive...

  • CG | BCMR | SRBs | 2000-057

    Original file (2000-057.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    APPLICANT’S ALLEGATIONS The applicant stated that on his tenth active duty anniversary, he was eligible for an SRB and that, pursuant to Coast Guard regulations, he should have been counseled about his eligibility. Coast Guard members who have served between 6 and 10 years on active duty are in “Zone B.” Members may only receive one SRB per zone. VIEWS OF THE COAST GUARD On August 2, 2000, the Chief Counsel of the Coast Guard recommended that the Board grant relief in this case.

  • CG | BCMR | SRBs | 2002-045

    Original file (2002-045.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    He also alleged that during this time, he was away from his servicing personnel reporting unit (PERSRU) and did not receive counseling about his eligibility to reenlist for an SRB on September 17, 2001, his tenth anniversary on active duty. The applicant alleged that, had he been counseled, he would have reenlisted for six years in order to obtain a Zone B SRB under ALCOAST 198/01. [ORDER AND SIGNATURES APPEAR ON NEXT PAGE] ORDER The six-month extension agreement, dated April 25, 2001 but...

  • CG | BCMR | SRBs | 1999-078

    Original file (1999-078.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    (3) of COMDTINST 7220.33, the applicant’s extension did not qualify her to receive an SRB because, although it was signed on January 21, 1998, it did not become operative until October 31, 1998, almost six months past her tenth anniversary on active duty. (3) of Enclosure (1) to Commandant Instruction 7220.33 (Reenlistment Bonus Programs Administration) states that to be eligible for a Zone B SRB, a member must “[h]ave completed at least 6 but not more than 10 years active service on the...

  • CG | BCMR | SRBs | 2002-111

    Original file (2002-111.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    He alleged that he was never counseled about his eligibility to reenlist on his six-year anniversary and that, if he had been, he would have reenlisted for 6 years. FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS Under COMDTINST 7220.33, members are entitled to proper counseling concerning their eligibility to reenlist to receive a Zone A SRB under ALDIST 184/99 and such counseling must be documented in their records. Since there is no such documentation, the applicant has proven to the satisfaction of the Board...

  • CG | BCMR | SRBs | 2005-121

    Original file (2005-121.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    This final decision, dated April 5, 2006, is signed by the three duly appointed APPLICANT’S REQUEST AND ALLEGATIONS The applicant asked the Board to correct his record so that he will be entitled to receive a Zone A selective reenlistment bonus (SRB) for reenlisting on his sixth active duty anniversary in May 2001 and a Zone B SRB for reenlisting on his tenth active duty anniversary in May 2005.1 The applicant alleged that he was eligible for a Zone A SRB when he extended his original...

  • CG | BCMR | SRBs | 2002-010

    Original file (2002-010.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    2002-010 Application for Correction of Coast Guard Record of: XXXXXXXXXXXXXX XXXXXXXXXXXXX FINAL DECISION The applicant asked the Board to correct his record to show that he reenlisted for six years on October 7, 2001, his tenth anniversary on active duty, so that he would be eligible for a Zone B selective reenlistment bonus (SRB), pursuant to ALCOAST 127/01. The Chief Counsel of the Coast Guard stated that the applicant was not counseled about his eligibility to reenlist for a Zone B SRB...

  • CG | BCMR | SRBs | 2002-085

    Original file (2002-085.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    2002-085 Application for Correction of Coast Guard Record of: XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX XXXXXXXXXXXXX FINAL DECISION ULMER, Chair: The applicant asked the Board to correct his record to show that he reenlisted on August 27, 2001, his tenth active duty anniversary, for a Zone B SRB (selective reenlistment bonus). The applicant stated that the Coast Guard did not counsel him that he could reenlist on his tenth active duty anniversary to obtain a Zone B SRB. His record shall be corrected to show that...

  • CG | BCMR | SRBs | 2002-024

    Original file (2002-024.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    They shall sign a page 7 service record entry, enclosure (3) outlining the effect that particular action has on their SRB entitlement.” Article 3.b. The Board finds that although the applicant would not have reenlisted for six years for an SRB he was not eligible for on October 9, 2001, he would have either been discharged or allowed to reenlist for three, four, five, or six years, notwithstanding his ineligibility to receive a Zone B SRB. Accordingly, the Board should deny the applicant’s...

  • CG | BCMR | SRBs | 2003-055

    Original file (2003-055.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    In support of his allegations, the applicant submitted a statement from his unit yeoman who acknowledged that the applicant’s paperwork was untimely processed and that the applicant received no SRB counseling. He recommended that the Board grant relief by correcting the applicant’s record to show that he reenlisted on January 4, 2003, for purposes of receiving a Zone B SRB pursuant to ALCOAST 329/02. The Chief Counsel admitted and the Board finds that the Coast Guard committed an error in...