Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | DRB | CY2015 | AR20150003009
Original file (AR20150003009.txt) Auto-classification: Denied
1.	APPLICANT’S NAME:	

	a.	Application Date:	1 October 2014

	b.	Date Received:	18 February 2015

	c.	Counsel:	Yes

2.	REQUEST, REASON, ISSUES, BOARD TYPE, AND DECISION:  The applicant requests an upgrade of the characterization of his discharge from under other than honorable conditions to honorable and to change the narrative reason for his discharge.  The applicant’s contentions indicated as an attached supplemental statement is not available.  The counsel representing the applicant states the statement would be submitted at a later date, prior to the personal appearance.  

After carefully examining the applicant’s record of service during the period of enlistment under review and hearing his testimony, the Board determined that the characterization of service was too harsh based on the applicant’s length and quality of his service to include his combat service, and the circumstances surrounding his discharge, and as a result it is inequitable.  It is concluded that his marital discord, his severe financial hardship, and civilian to military job disparity issues may have been causative factors in the misconduct that led to the discharge.  After carefully weighing that fact against the severity of the applicant’s misconduct, there is sufficient mitigating evidence to warrant upgrading the characterization of the applicant’s service to general, under honorable conditions 

Accordingly, in a personal appearance hearing conducted at Arlington, Virginia, on 
28 September 2015, and by a 3-2 vote, the Board voted to grant partial relief in the form of an upgrade of the characterization of service to general, under honorable conditions.  Further, the Board determined the reason for discharge was proper and equitable, and by a 5-0 vote, the Board voted not to change it, finding the narrative reason for the applicant’s separation was both proper and equitable.  This action entails restoration of grade to E-5/SGT.

	(Board member names available upon request.)

3.	DISCHARGE DETAILS:

	a.	Reason/Authority/Codes/Characterization:  AR 135-178 / Under Other Than Honorable Conditions

	b.	Date of Discharge:  1 August 2006

	c.	Separation Facts:  NIF

		(1)	Date of Notification of Intent to Separate:  NIF

		(2)	Basis for Separation:  The applicant was informed of the following reasons:  NIF

		(3)	Recommended Characterization:  NIF

		(4)	Legal Consultation Date:  NIF
		(5)	Administrative Separation Board:  NIF

		(6)	Separation Decision Date/Characterization:  NIF  

4.	SERVICE DETAILS:

	a.	Date/Period of Enlistment:  7 February 2005 / 6 years

	b.	Age at Enlistment/Education/GT Score:  34 / HS Graduate / 121

	c.	Highest Grade Achieved/MOS/Total Service:  E-6 / 68P10, Radiology Specialist / 15 years, 5 months, 25 days
  
	d.	Prior Service/Characterizations:  NIF       (23 February 1988-14 June 1988) / NIF
			    USN     (15 June 1988-14 June 1992) / HD
			    USNR  (15 June 1992-12 October 1993) / NA
			    RA       (13 October 1993-19 February 1997) / HD
			    RA       (20 February 1997-19 February 1999) / HD
			    USAR  (17 March 1999-19 March 2002) / HD
  
	e.	Overseas Service/Combat Service:  SWA (31 August 1994-12 January 1995), (12 July 1996-15 December 1996)
  
	f.	Awards and Decorations:  ARCOM; AAM-3; AGCM; NGCM; NDSM; AFEM; SWASM-1BSS; NPDR-2; ASR; SSDR; JMUA; MUC
  
	g.	Performance Ratings:  Yes
  
	h.	Disciplinary Action(s)/Evidentiary Record:  NIF
  
	i.	Lost Time:  NIF
  
	j.	Diagnosed PTSD/TBI/Behavioral Health:  NIF

5.	APPLICANT-PROVIDED EVIDENCE:  Counsel-authored letter, dated 13 February 2015; DD Form 214 for service ending 19 February 1999; and USN DD Form 214 for service ending 14 June 1992.

6.	POST SERVICE ACCOMPLISHMENTS:  None.

7.	REGULATORY CITATION(S):  Army Regulation 135-178 sets forth the policies, standards, and procedures to ensure the readiness and competency of the U.S. Army while providing for the orderly administrative separation of Army National Guard and U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) enlisted Soldiers for a variety of reasons. The separation policies throughout the different Chapters in this regulation promote the readiness of the Army by providing an orderly means to judge the suitability of persons to serve on the basis of their conduct and their ability to meet required standards of duty performance and discipline.  Specific categories include minor disciplinary infractions, a pattern of misconduct, and commission of a serious offense, to include abuse of illegal drugs, and convictions by civil authorities.  

The characterization is based upon the quality of the Soldier’s service, including the reason for separation and determined in accordance with standards of acceptable personal conduct and performance of duty as found in the UCMJ, Army regulations, and the time-honored customs and traditions of the Army.  The reasons for separation, including the specific circumstances that form the basis for the discharge are considered on the issue of characterization. 

Possible characterizations of service include an honorable, general, under honorable conditions, under other than honorable conditions, or uncharacterized if the Soldier is in entry-level status.  However, the permissible range of characterization varies based on the reason for separation.

8.	DISCUSSION OF ISSUE(S):  The applicant requests to upgrade the characterization of his discharge from under other than honorable conditions to honorable and to change the narrative reason for his discharge.  

The applicant’s available record of service and his application were carefully reviewed.  However, the service record is void of the specific facts and circumstances concerning the events which led to his discharge from the Army Reserve.  

Barring evidence to the contrary, it appears all requirements of law and regulation were met and the rights of the applicant were fully protected throughout the separation process.  The applicant provided no independent corroborating evidence demonstrating that either the command's action was erroneous or that his service mitigated the type of discharge he received from the U.S. Army Reserve.   

The applicant seeking relief provided no further statement to address any specific issues. 

Absent any issues to address, the facts and circumstances leading to the discharge are also unknown.  The burden of proof remains with the applicant to provide the appropriate documents such as the discharge packet or other evidence sufficient to explain the facts, circumstances, and reasons underlying the separation action, for the Board's consideration.  While the applicant is scheduled for a personal appearance hearing, it would still be his responsibility to meet the burden of proof since the discharge packet is not available in the official record. 

Based on the available records, the Board determined the characterization of service was too harsh.  However, the discharge appears consistent with the procedural and substantive requirements of the regulation, was within the discretion of the separation authority, and the applicant was provided full administrative due process.  

9.  DOCUMENTS/TESTIMONY PRESENTED DURING PERSONAL APPEARANCE:  

1.	The applicant submitted the following additional document(s):

	a.	Post Service Transcripts/Certificates

	b.	Navy Records

	c.	Letters of Recommendation

	d.  NCOERs and AERs

2.	The applicant presented no additional contentions.

In addition to the evidence in the record, the Board carefully considered the additional document(s) and testimony presented by the applicant at the personal appearance hearing.

10.	BOARD ACTION DIRECTED:

	a.	Issue a new Discharge Order:  		Yes

	b.	Change Characterization to:  		General, Under Honorable Conditions

	c.	Change Reason to:  				No Change

	d.	Change SPD/RE Code to:  			No Change

	e.	Restore (Restoration of) Grade to:  	E-5/SGT


AUTHENTICATING OFFICIAL:  




COL, US ARMY
Presiding Officer
Army Discharge Review Board



















Legend:
AWOL - Absent Without Leave	GD - General Discharge	NIF - Not in File	SPCM - Special Court Martial 
BCD - Bad Conduct Discharge	HS - High School		OAD - Ordered to Active Duty	SPD - Separation Program Designator
CG - Company Grade Article 15	HD - Honorable Discharge	OMPF - Official Military Personnel File	TBI – Traumatic Brain Injury
CID - Criminal Investigation Division	MP – Military Police	PTSD – Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder	UNC - Uncharacterized Discharge  
ELS – Entry Level Status	IADT – Initial Active Duty Training	RE - Reentry	UOTHC - Under Other Than Honorable Conditions
FG - Field Grade Article 15	NA - Not applicable	SCM - Summary Court Martial	
ARMY DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD CASE REPORT AND DIRECTIVE

AR20150003009


2

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2015 | AR20150000452

    Original file (AR20150000452.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Date Received: 29 December 2014 c. Counsel: Yes 2. The reasons for separation, including the specific circumstances that form the basis for the discharge are considered on the issue of characterization. Change Characterization to: No Change c. Change Reason to: No Change d. SPD/RE Code Change to: No Change e. Restoration to Grade: NA Authenticating Official: COL, US ARMY Presiding Officer Army Discharge Review Board Legend: AWOL - Absent Without Leave GD - General Discharge NA - Not...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2015 | AR20150002973

    Original file (AR20150002973.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    REQUEST, REASON, ISSUES, BOARD TYPE AND DECISION: The applicant requests an upgrade from general, under honorable conditions discharge to honorable. DISCHARGE DETAILS: a. Reason/Authority/Codes/Characterization: Misconduct (Drug Abuse)/AR 635-200, Paragraph 14-12c(2)/JKK/RE-4/General, Under Honorable Conditions b. Date of Discharge: 27 November 2013 c. Separation Facts: (1) Date of Notification of Intent to Separate: NIF (2) Basis for Separation: The applicant’s record is void of the...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2015 | AR20150001285

    Original file (AR20150001285.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Date Received: 23 January 2015 c. Counsel: None 2. Date of Discharge: 7 October 2012 c. Separation Facts: (1) Date of Notification of Intent to Separate: 23 March 2012 (2) Basis for Separation: The applicant was informed of the following reasons for his discharge: Being absent from at least nine Army Reserve training assemblies within a one year period and failing to provide a valid reason for his absence, and Failing to attend at least nine MUTA Battle Assemblies during the last 12...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2014 | AR20140004597

    Original file (AR20140004597.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The reasons for separation, including the specific circumstances that form the basis for the discharge are considered on the issue of characterization. Therefore, based on the available evidence and the presumption of government regularity, it appears the reason for discharge and the characterization of service are both proper and equitable, thus the analyst recommends the Board deny relief. Arlington, VA Date: 10 June 2014 The Army Discharge Review Board, under the provisions of Title 10,...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120006639

    Original file (AR20120006639.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The reasons for separation, including the specific circumstances that form the basis for the discharge are considered on the issue of characterization. The applicant provided no independent corroborating evidence demonstrating that either the command's action was erroneous or that the applicant’s service mitigated the type of discharge he received from the U.S. Army Reserve. Accordingly, the Board voted to grant relief by changing the characterization of service to general, under honorable...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120021929

    Original file (AR20120021929.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    IN THE CASE OF: Mr. BOARD DATE: 15 July 2013 CASE NUMBER: AR20120021929 ___________________________________________________________________________ Board Determination and Directed Action After carefully examining the applicant's record of service during the period of enlistment under review, hearing his testimony and considering the Discussion and Recommendation which follows, the Board determined the discharge was both proper and equitable and voted to deny relief. The reasons for...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2015 | AR20150005187

    Original file (AR20150005187.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    REQUEST, REASON, ISSUES, BOARD TYPE, AND DECISION: The applicant request an upgrade of his general, under honorable conditions discharge characterization of service to honorable and a change to the narrative reason for separation. The evidence of record shows the applicant had a prior board review on 10 June 2014. Date of Discharge: 24 July 2012 c. Separation Facts: (1) Date of Notification of Intent to Separate: 13 February 2012 and again 12 March 2012 (2) Basis for Separation: The...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2014 | AR20140019852

    Original file (AR20140019852.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    REQUEST, REASON, ISSUES, BOARD TYPE, AND DECISION: The applicant requests an upgrade of his discharge characterization from general, under honorable conditions to honorable. Accordingly, the Board voted to grant full relief in the form of an upgrade of the characterization of service to honorable. The service of a member separated under this provision of Army Regulation 135-178, Chapter 6, will be characterized as honorable unless an uncharacterized description of service is required or a...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130017191

    Original file (AR20130017191.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Prior Board Review: Yes, 3 May 2013 SUMMARY OF SERVICE: The applicant enlisted in the U.S. Army Reserve on 21 March 2008, for 6 years. The reasons for separation, including the specific circumstances that form the basis for the discharge are considered on the issue of characterization. In addition to the evidence in the record, the Board carefully considered the additional documents and testimony presented by the applicant at the personal appearance hearing.

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130020628

    Original file (AR20130020628.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    IN THE CASE OF: Ms. BOARD DATE: 14 March 2014 CASE NUMBER: AR20130020628 ___________________________________________________________________________ Board Determination and Directed Action After carefully examining the applicant’s record of service during the period of enlistment under review, hearing her testimony, and notwithstanding the Discussion and Recommendation which follows, the Board determined that the characterization of service was too harsh based on the circumstances surround...