Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130016196
Original file (AR20130016196.txt) Auto-classification: Denied
      IN THE CASE OF:	Ms. 

      BOARD DATE:	20 June 2014

      CASE NUMBER:	AR20130016196
___________________________________________________________________________

Board Determination and Directed Action

After carefully examining the applicant's record of service during the period of enlistment under review and considering the Discussion and Recommendation which follows, the Board determined the discharge was both proper and equitable and voted to deny relief.




      
      
      Presiding Officer
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Department of the Army Discharge Review Board in this case.

THE APPLICANT’S REQUEST AND STATEMENT:

1.  The applicant requests to upgrade the characterization of her service from general, under honorable conditions to fully honorable.  

2.  The applicant states, in effect, she would like to reenlist in the Army. The recruiter told her that she would not be able to join unless her discharge was upgraded.  She misses the Army and would happily go through basic training again.  A Hispanic female Soldier hit her in the back and pulled her hair and she retaliated.  They ended up wrestling on the ground.  They were both taken to the hospital for treatment and she still does not know why the Soldier hit her.  She served honorably for two years prior to the unfortunate incident that occurred.

DISCHARGE UNDER REVIEW INFORMATION:

	a.	Application Receipt Date:	3 September 2013
	b.	Discharge Received:	General, Under Honorable Conditions
	c.	Date of Discharge:	5 March 2012
	d.	Reason/Authority/SPD/RE Code:	Misconduct (Serious Offense), AR 635-200, 
			Paragraph 14-12c, JKQ, RE-3
	e.	Unit of assignment:	609th FSC, Fort Sill, OK
	f.	Current Enlistment Date/Term:	3 November 2009, 4 years
	g.	Current Enlistment Service:	2 years, 4 months, 3 days
	h.	Total Service:	2 years, 4 months, 3 days
	i.	Time Lost:	None
	j.	Previous Discharges:	None
	k.	Highest Grade Achieved:	NIF
	l.	Military Occupational Specialty:	92A10, Automated Logistical Specialist
	m.	GT Score:	NIF
	n.	Education:	HS Graduate
	o.	Overseas Service:	None
	p.	Combat Service:	None
	q.	Decorations/Awards:	AAM; NDSM; GWOTSM; ASR
	r.	Administrative Separation Board: 	No
	s.	Performance Ratings:	None
	t.	Counseling Statements:	NIF
	u.	Prior Board Review:	No 

SUMMARY OF SERVICE:

The record shows the applicant enlisted in the Regular Army on 3 November 2009, for a period of 4 years.  She was 19 years old at the time of entry and a high school graduate.  She was trained in and awarded military occupational specialty (MOS) 92A10, Automated Logistical Specialist.  She earned an AAM award.  She completed 2 years, 4 months, and 3 days of active duty service.


SEPARATION FACTS AND CIRCUMSTANCES:

1.  The applicant’s service record is void of the specific facts and circumstances concerning the events which led to the discharge from the Army.  However, the record contains a properly constituted DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty), which was digitally authenticated by the applicant’s signature.  

2.  The DD Form 214 indicates on 5 March 2012, the applicant was discharged under the provisions of Chapter 14, AR 635-200, for misconduct (serious offense), with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions.  The DD Form 214 also shows a Separation Program Designator (SPD) code of JKQ and a reentry (RE) code of 3.  

3.  The applicant’s available record does not show any recorded actions under the UCMJ, unauthorized absences or time lost.  However, she was separated as a PV1/E-1 and the action that caused her reduction is not contained in the service record.

4.  On 24 February 2012, HQDA USA Installation Management Command, HQ, USAG, Fort Sill, Fort Sill, OK, Orders Number 055-1302, discharged the applicant from the Army, effective 5 March 2012.

EVIDENCE OBTAINED FROM THE APPLICANT'S RECORD:

There are no negative counseling statements or actions under the Uniform Code of Military Justice.

EVIDENCE SUBMITTED BY THE APPLICANT:

The applicant provided a self-authored statement in her application with her DD Form 214 for service under current review and a copy of her picture.  

POST-SERVICE ACTIVITY: 

The applicant provided none.  

REGULATORY AUTHORITY:

1.  Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel.  Chapter 14 establishes policy and prescribes procedures for separating members for misconduct.  Specific categories include minor disciplinary infractions, a pattern of misconduct, and commission of a serious offense, to include abuse of illegal drugs, convictions by civil authorities and desertion or being absent without leave.  Action will be taken to separate a member for misconduct when it is clearly established that rehabilitation is impractical or unlikely to succeed.  Army policy states that an under other than honorable conditions discharge is normally considered appropriate; however, a general, under honorable conditions or an honorable discharge may be granted.   

2.  Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 3-7a, provides that an honorable discharge is a separation with honor and entitles the recipient to benefits provided by law.  The honorable characterization is appropriate when the quality of the member’s service generally has met the standards of acceptable conduct and performance of duty for Army personnel, or is otherwise so meritorious that any other characterization would be clearly inappropriate.  Whenever there is doubt, it is to be resolved in favor of the individual.

3.  Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 3-7b, provides that a general discharge is a separation from the Army under honorable conditions.  When authorized, it is issued to a Soldier whose military record is satisfactory but not sufficiently meritorious to warrant an honorable discharge.  A characterization of under honorable conditions may be issued only when the reason for the Soldier’s separation specifically allows such characterization.

DISCUSSION AND RECOMMENDATION:

1. The applicant’s request for an upgrade of the characterization of her discharge was carefully considered.  However, after examining the applicant’s record of service, her military records, and the issues and document submitted with the application, there are insufficient mitigating factors to merit an upgrade of the applicant's discharge.  

2.  The applicant’s record is void of the specific facts and circumstances concerning the events which led to her discharge from the Army.  However, the record contains a properly constituted DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty), which was digitally authenticated by the applicant's signature.  This document identifies the reason and characterization of the discharge and government regularity is presumed in the discharge process.  

3.  The DD Form 214 also indicates the applicant was discharged under the provisions of Chapter 14, AR 635-200, paragraph 14-12c by reason of misconduct (serious offense), with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions.  Barring evidence to the contrary, the presumption of government regularity prevails as it appears that all the requirements of law and regulation were met and the rights of the applicant were fully protected throughout the separation process.  

4.  The applicant's contentions about the incident that led to her discharge were carefully considered.  However, there is insufficient evidence available in the official record to make a determination upon the applicant's quality of service.  Moreover, there is a presumption of regularity in the conduct of governmental affairs which is applied in all Army discharge reviews unless there is substantial credible evidence to rebut the presumption.  There is no evidence in the record, nor has the applicant produced any evidence, to support a change to the characterization of service granted.  The applicant’s statements alone do not overcome the presumption of government regularity and the application contains no documentation or further evidence in support of this request for an upgrade of the discharge.  

5.  If the applicant desires a personal appearance hearing, it will be her responsibility to meet the burden of proof and provide the appropriate documents (i.e., the discharge packet) or other evidence sufficient to explain the facts, circumstances, and reasons underlying the separation action, for the Board’s consideration because they are not available in the official record.

6.  The applicant desires to rejoin the Military Service.  However, Soldiers being processed for separation are assigned reentry codes based on their service records or the reason for discharge.  Based on Army Regulation 635-5-1 and the SPD Code/RE Code Cross Reference Table the applicant was appropriately assigned an RE code of 3.  There are no basis upon which to grant a change to the reason or to the RE code.  An RE Code of 3 indicates the applicant requires a waiver prior to being allowed to reenlist.  If reenlistment is desired, the applicant should contact a local recruiter to determine eligibility to reenlist.  Recruiters can best advise a former service member as to the needs of the Army at the time, and are required to process waivers of reentry eligibility (RE) codes if appropriate.

7.  Therefore, based on the available evidence and the government presumption of regularity, it appears the reason for discharge and the characterization of service are both proper and equitable, thus recommend the Board deny relief.

SUMMARY OF ARMY DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING:

Type of Hearing:  Records Review      Date:  20 June 2014        Location: Washington, DC

Did the Applicant Testify?  No

Counsel:  None

Witnesses/Observers:  No

Board Vote:
Character Change:  0	No Change:  5
Reason Change:	0	No Change:  5
(Board member names available upon request)

Board Action Directed:
Issue a new DD Form 214:		No
Change Characterization to:	No Change
Change Reason to:			No Change
Change Authority for Separation:	NA
Change RE Code to:		NA
Grade Restoration to:		NA
Other:					NA



Legend:
AMHRR - Army Military Human Resource Record	FG - Field Grade	IADT – Initial Active Duty Training	 	RE - Reentry
AWOL - Absent Without Leave	GD - General Discharge	NA - Not applicable	SCM- Summary Court Martial
BCD - Bad Conduct Discharge	HS - High School	NIF - Not in File	SPCM - Special Court Martial
CG - Company Grade Article 15	HD - Honorable Discharge	OAD - Ordered to Active Duty	UNC - Uncharacterized Discharge  
CID - Criminal investigation Department	MP – Military Police	OMPF - Official Military Personnel File	UOTHC - Under Other Than                           			               Honorable Conditions
ADRB Case Report and Directive (cont)		AR20130016196

Page 5 of 5 pages


ARMY DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (ADRB)

CASE REPORT AND DIRECTIVE



1


Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130017204

    Original file (AR20130017204.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    IN THE CASE OF: Ms. BOARD DATE: 27 June 2014 CASE NUMBER: AR20130017204 ___________________________________________________________________________ Board Determination and Directed Action After carefully examining the applicant's record of service during the period of enlistment under review and considering the Discussion and Recommendation which follows, the Board determined the discharge was both proper and equitable and voted to deny relief. Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 3-7b,...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060008787

    Original file (AR20060008787.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Request Request: Upgrade Reason Change RE Code Change Issues: See applicant's attached DD Form 293. Accordingly, the Board voted to upgrade the discharge to fully honorable and a change to the narrative reason for separation to Secretarial Authority. Certification Signature and Date Approval Authority: ROBERT L. HOUSE Colonel, U.S. Army President, Army Discharge Review Board Official: ESMERALDA G. PROCTOR DATE: 061027 Colonel, U.S. Army Chief, Secretary Recorder ARMY DISCHARGE...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130016346

    Original file (AR20130016346.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    IN THE CASE OF: Ms. BOARD DATE: 23 June 2014 CASE NUMBER: AR20130016346 ___________________________________________________________________________ Board Determination and Directed Action After carefully examining the applicant's record of service during the period of enlistment under review, and considering the Discussion and Recommendation which follows, the Board determined the discharge was both proper and equitable and voted to deny relief. Three counseling statements, dated between 3...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070015159

    Original file (AR20070015159.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    At the time of release from active duty training, the applicant had completed 6 months and 13 days of active military service in the period under review. Therefore, the analyst determined the reason for discharge and the characterization of service were both proper and equitable and recommends to the Board to deny relief. (2) In the course of the review of the applicant’s military records and the issue she submitted, the analyst determined that the applicant's characterization of service...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130010000

    Original file (AR20130010000.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The regulation stipulates that a separation will be described as entry-level with service uncharacterized if, at the time separation action is initiated, the Soldier has less than 180 days of continuous active duty service. The DD Form 214 indicates the applicant was discharged under the provisions of Chapter 11, AR 635-200, by reason of entry level performance and conduct, with a characterization of service described as uncharacterized. Regarding the applicant’s contentions that the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | AR20110017163

    Original file (AR20110017163.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? Applicant Request: Upgrade Reason Change RE Code Change Issues: The applicant states, in effect, that she would like an upgrade of her discharge to honorable in order to receive GI Bill benefits. The DD Form 214 indicates the applicant was discharged under the provisions of Chapter 9, AR 635-200, by reason of alcohol rehabilitation failure, with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions.

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120019404

    Original file (AR20120019404.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The evidence contained in the applicant’s service record indicates that on 13 May 2009, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, paragraph 14-12c(2), AR 635-200 by reason of misconduct-abuse of illegal drugs for the wrongful use of marijuana between 12 February 2009 and 12 March 2009. On 28 May 2009, the separation authority waived further rehabilitation and directed the applicant’s discharge with a characterization of...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120001077

    Original file (AR20120001077.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? Applicant Request: Upgrade Reason Change RE Code Change Issues: The applicant states, in effect, that she is requesting an upgrade of her discharge due to an injustice and inequity in her discharge. c. Response to Issues, Recommendation and Rationale: After a careful review of all the applicant’s available military records, the issue and documents submitted with the application, the analyst found no mitigating factors that would merit an upgrade of the applicant’s discharge.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | AR20120001077

    Original file (AR20120001077.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? Applicant Request: Upgrade Reason Change RE Code Change Issues: The applicant states, in effect, that she is requesting an upgrade of her discharge due to an injustice and inequity in her discharge. c. Response to Issues, Recommendation and Rationale: After a careful review of all the applicant’s available military records, the issue and documents submitted with the application, the analyst found no mitigating factors that would merit an upgrade of the applicant’s discharge.

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110009662

    Original file (AR20110009662.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Chapter 10 of that regulation provides, in pertinent part, that a member who has committed an offense or offenses for which the authorized punishment includes a punitive discharge may submit a request for a discharge for the good of the Service in lieu of trial by court-martial. Yes No Counsel: None Witnesses/Observers: NA Exhibits Submitted: DD Form 293 dated 23 April 2011. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization...