IN THE CASE OF: Mr.
BOARD DATE: 14 May 2014
CASE NUMBER: AR20130015676
___________________________________________________________________________
Board Determination and Directed Action
After carefully examining the applicant's record of service during the period of enlistment under review, and considering the examiners Discussion and Recommendation which follows, the Board determined the discharge was both proper and equitable and voted to deny relief.
Presiding Officer
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Department of the Army Discharge Review Board in this case.
THE APPLICANTS REQUEST AND STATEMENT:
1. The applicant requests an upgrade of his discharge from general, under honorable conditions to honorable, a change to the reentry eligibility (RE) code and to the narrative reason for the discharge.
2. The applicant states, in effect, that he would like an upgrade of his discharge for the purpose of being able to serve his country again. The applicant contends his discharge was fair; however, he believes his RE code is incorrect.
DISCHARGE UNDER REVIEW INFORMATION:
a. Application Receipt Date: 23 August 2013
b. Discharge received: General, Under Honorable Conditions
c. Date of Discharge: 27 March 2013
d. Reason/Authority/SPD/RE: Alcohol Rehabilitation Failure, Chapter 9, AR 635-200 JPD, RE-4
e. Unit of assignment: C Co, HHB, Fort Hood, TX
f. Current Enlistment Date/Term: 12 May 2010, 4 years
g. Current Enlistment Service: 2 years, 10 months, 16 days
h. Total Service: 2 years, 10 months, 16 days
i. Time Lost: None
j. Previous Discharges: None
k. Highest Grade Achieved: E-4
l. Military Occupational Specialty: 25N10, Nodal Network Systems
m. GT Score: NIF
n. Education: HS Graduate
o. Overseas Service: None
p. Combat Service: None
q. Decorations/Awards: NDSM, GWOTSM, ASR
r. Administrative Separation Board: No
s. Performance Ratings: None
t. Counseling Statements: None
u. Prior Board Review: No
SUMMARY OF SERVICE:
The applicant enlisted in the Regular Army on 12 May 2010, for a period of 4 years. He was 18 years old at the time and a high school graduate. He was serving at Fort Hood, TX when his discharge was initiated. The record does not contain any evidence of acts of valor or meritorious achievements.
SEPARATION FACTS AND CIRCUMSTANCES:
1. The applicants service record is void of the complete facts and circumstances concerning the events which led to the discharge from the Army. However, the record does contain the
separation authority's approval memorandum.
2. The memorandum indicates the separation authority waived further rehabilitation and directed the applicant's discharge with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions; under the provisions of Chapter 9, AR 635-200, for being an alcohol or drug abuse rehabilitation failure.
3. The record also contains a properly constituted DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty), which was authenticated by the applicants signature.
4. The DD Form 214 indicates that on 27 March 2013, the applicant was discharged under the provisions of Chapter 9, AR 635-200, for being an alcohol rehabilitation failure, with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. The DD Form 214 also shows a Separation Program Designator (SPD) code of JPD and a reentry (RE) code of 4.
5. The applicants service record does not contain any evidence of unauthorized absences or time lost.
EVIDENCE OBTAINED FROM THE APPLICANT'S RECORD:
The available record contains no negative counseling's or actions under the Uniform Code of Military Justice.
EVIDENCE SUBMITTED BY THE APPLICANT:
The applicant provided a DD Form 293.
POST-SERVICE ACTIVITY:
None were provided with the application.
REGULATORY AUTHORITY:
1. Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel. Chapter 9 outlines the procedures for discharging individuals because of alcohol or other drug abuse.
2. A member who has been referred to the Army Substance Abuse Program (ASAP) for alcohol or drug abuse may be separated because of inability or refusal to participate in, cooperate in, or successfully complete such a program if there is a lack of potential for continued Army service and rehabilitation efforts are no longer practical.
3. Army policy states that an honorable or general, under honorable conditions discharge is authorized depending on the applicants overall record of service. However, an honorable discharge is required if limited use information is used in the discharge process.
4. Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 3-7a, provides that an honorable discharge is a separation with honor and entitles the recipient to benefits provided by law. The honorable characterization is appropriate when the quality of the members service generally has met the standards of acceptable conduct and performance of duty for Army personnel, or is otherwise so meritorious that any other characterization would be clearly inappropriate. Whenever there is doubt, it is to be resolved in favor of the individual.
5. Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 3-7b, provides that a general discharge is a separation from the Army under honorable conditions. When authorized, it is issued to a Soldier whose military record is satisfactory but not sufficiently meritorious to warrant an honorable discharge. A characterization of under honorable conditions may be issued only when the reason for the Soldiers separation specifically allows such characterization.
6. Army Regulation 635-5-1 (Separation Program Designator (SPD) Codes) provides the specific authorities (regulatory or directive), reasons for separating Soldiers from active duty, and the SPD codes to be entered on the DD Form 214. It identifies the SPD code of "JPD" as the appropriate code to assign enlisted Soldiers who are discharged under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, Chapter 9, for alcohol rehabilitation failure.
7. The SPD Code/RE Code Cross Reference Table shows that a Soldier assigned an SPD Code of "JPD" will be assigned an RE Code of 4.
ANALYSTS DISCUSSION AND RECOMMENDATION:
1. The applicants request for an upgrade of the characterization of his discharge was carefully considered. However, after examining the applicants available record of service, his military records, the issues and documents submitted with the application, there are insufficient mitigating factors to merit an upgrade of the applicant's discharge.
2. The only pertinent evidence available for review regarding the applicant's discharge is the separation authoritys approval memorandum and the DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, which was authenticated by the applicant. The DD Form 214 shows the applicant was discharged under the provisions of Chapter 9, AR 635-200, for alcohol rehabilitation failure.
3. For this type of discharge, the applicant would have been enrolled in the Army Substance Abuse Program (ASAP) and would have been aware of the consequences of any action which would demonstrate any inability or refusal to participate in, cooperate in, or successfully complete such a program. Inasmuch as the applicant's official record is void of the circumstances leading to his discharge, it is presumed that he was identified as a rehabilitation failure subsequent to his enrollment in the ASAP program. Therefore, it is also presumed that the applicant was properly counseled and afforded a reasonable opportunity to overcome his problems, and chose not to avail himself of this opportunity.
4. If the applicant desires a personal appearance hearing, it will be his responsibility to meet the burden of proof and provide the appropriate documents (i.e., the complete discharge packet) or other evidence sufficient to explain the facts, circumstances, and reasons underlying the separation action, for the Boards consideration because they are not available in the official record.
5. The applicant contends that a change in his narrative reason for the discharge and his reentry code would allow for his reenlistment. However, Army Regulation 635-5-1 (Separation Program Designator (SPD) Codes) provides the specific authorities (regulatory or directive), reasons for separating Soldiers from active duty, and the SPD codes to be entered on the DD Form 214. It identifies the SPD code of "JPD" as the appropriate code to assign enlisted Soldiers who are discharged under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, Chapter 9, for alcohol rehabilitation failure. The regulation further stipulates that no deviation is authorized.
6. Further, the SPD Code/RE Code Cross Reference Table shows that a Soldier assigned an SPD Code of "JPD" will be assigned an RE Code of 4. An RE code of 4 cannot be waived and the applicant is no longer eligible for reenlistment.
7. Therefore, based on the available evidence and the government presumption of regularity, it appears the reason for discharge and the characterization of service are both proper and equitable, thus recommend the Board deny relief.
SUMMARY OF ARMY DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING:
Type of Hearing: Records Review Date: 14 May 2014 Location: Washington, DC
Did the Applicant Testify? NA
Counsel: None
Board Vote:
Character Change: 0 No Change: 5
Reason Change: 0 No Change: 5
(Board member names available upon request)
Board Action Directed:
Issue a new DD Form 214: No
Change Characterization to: No Change
Change Reason to: No Change
Change Authority for Separation: NA
Change RE Code to: NA
Grade Restoration to: NA
Other: NA
Legend:
AMHRR - Army Military Human Resource Record FG - Field Grade IADT Initial Active Duty Training RE - Reentry
AWOL - Absent Without Leave GD - General Discharge NA - Not applicable SCM- Summary Court Martial
BCD - Bad Conduct Discharge HS - High School NIF - Not in File SPCM - Special Court Martial
CG - Company Grade Article 15 HD - Honorable Discharge OAD - Ordered to Active Duty UNC - Uncharacterized Discharge
CID - Criminal investigation Department MP Military Police OMPF - Official Military Personnel File UOTHC - Under Other Than Honorable Conditions
ADRB Case Report and Directive (cont) AR20130015676
Page 5 of 5 pages
ARMY DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (ADRB)
CASE REPORT AND DIRECTIVE
1
ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130008998
On 18 November 2010, the separation authority waived further rehabilitation and directed the applicants discharge with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. EVIDENCE SUBMITTED BY THE APPLICANT: The applicant provided a VA rating decision, dated 7 March 2012; DA Form 638, Recommendation for Award, dated 11 October 2009, indicated she was approved for an ARCOM; and her battalion commanders recommendation for an honorable discharge, dated 17 November 2010. ...
ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130001581
The applicant was separated on 13 July 2007, under Army Regulation 635-200, Chapter 9, for alcohol rehabilitation failure, with an honorable discharge, an SPD code of JPD and a RE code of 4. Army Regulation 635-5-1 (Separation Program Designator (SPD) Codes) provides the specific authorities (regulatory or directive), reasons for separating Soldiers from active duty, and the SPD codes to be entered on the DD Form 214. However, Army Regulation 635-5-1 (Separation Program Designator (SPD)...
ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130007898
The evidence of record indicates that on 13 February 2012, the unit commander in consultation with the Clinical Director/Army Substance Abuse Program (ASAP), declared the applicant a rehabilitation failure. The unit commander advised the applicant of his rights and recommended a discharge from the Army with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions and waiver of any additional rehabilitation measures. Army Regulation 635-5-1 (Separation Program Designator (SPD)...
ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130014703
The evidence of record indicates that on 18 May 2011, the applicant was command-referred to the Army Drug and Alcohol Prevention Training. On 22 July 2011, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 9-2, AR 635-200, by reason of alcohol rehabilitation failure because it was determined further rehabilitative efforts/attempts were not practical, that he received a FG Article 15 (110526) for a previous wrongful overindulgence of...
ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130005955
The separation authority waived further rehabilitation and directed the applicants discharge with an honorable characterization of service. The applicant was separated on 2 October 2009, under Army Regulation 635-200, Chapter 9, for alcohol rehabilitation failure, with an honorable discharge, an SPD code of JPD and a RE code of 4. The applicants statements alone do not overcome the governments presumption of regularity and no additional corroborating and supporting documentation or...
ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130011572
The applicant states, in effect, he would like to reenlist in the military. Discharge Received: General, Under Honorable Conditions c. Date of Discharge: 1 June 2010 d. Reason/Authority/SPD/RE Code: Alcohol Rehabilitation Failure, AR 635-200, Chapter 9, JPD, RE-4 e. Unit of assignment: Bravo Battery, 4th Battalion, 1st Field Artillery, Fort Bliss, TX f. Current Enlistment Date/Term: 20 January 2009/3 years, 18 weeks g. Current Enlistment Service: 1 year, 4 months, 12 days h. Total Service:...
ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130014476
The applicant submitted his discharge packet as evidence that shows on 19 February 2013, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 9, AR 635-200, by reason of alcohol or other drug rehabilitation failure for being a rehabilitation failure. Army Regulation 635-5-1 (Separation Program Designator (SPD) Codes) provides the specific authorities (regulatory or directive), reasons for separating Soldiers from active duty, and the...
ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130009466
Presiding Officer I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Department of the Army Discharge Review Board in this case. Discharge Received: General, Under Honorable Conditions c. Date of Discharge: 2 May 2008 d. Reason/Authority/SPD/RE Code: Alcohol Rehabilitation Failure, AR 635-200, Chapter 9, JPD, RE-4 e. Unit of assignment: 68th Combat Support Equipment Company, Fort Hood, Texas f. Current Enlistment Date/Term: 9 November 2004/ 4 years g....
ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130003985
IN THE CASE OF: Mr. BOARD DATE: 28 August 2013 CASE NUMBER: AR20130003985 ___________________________________________________________________________ Board Determination and Directed Action After carefully examining the applicants record of service during the period of enlistment under review and notwithstanding the Discussion and Recommendation which follows, the Board determined that the characterization of service was too harsh based on the applicants length and quality of his service...
ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130001122
Discharge Received: General, Under Honorable Conditions c. Date of Discharge: 6 October 2010 d. Reason/Authority/SPD/RE Code: Alcohol Rehabilitation Failure, AR 635-200, Chapter 9, JPD, RE-4 e. Unit of assignment: HHC, 7th U.S. Army Joint Multinational Training Command, Vilseck, Germany f. Current Enlistment Date/Term: 22 June 2007, 4 years g. Current Enlistment Service: 3 years, 3 months, 15 days h. Total Service: 6 years, 8 months, 17 days i. On 10 August 2010, the unit commander notified...