Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130008999
Original file (AR20130008999.txt) Auto-classification: Denied
      IN THE CASE OF:  	Mr. 

      BOARD DATE:  	2 December 2013

      CASE NUMBER:  	AR20130008999
___________________________________________________________________________

Board Determination and Directed Action

1.  After carefully examining the applicant’s record of service during the period of enlistment under review and considering the Discussion and Recommendation which follows, the Board determined the applicant’s characterization of service was improper.  Army Regulation 635-200, Chapter 5, paragraph 5-13, states that the service of a Soldier separated per this paragraph will be characterized as honorable unless an entry-level separation is required under Chapter 3, section III.  The applicant was not in entry level status and his service, per the governing regulation, should have been characterized as honorable.

2.  Accordingly, the Board voted to grant full relief in the form of an upgrade of the characterization of service to honorable.  However, the Board determined that the reason for discharge was both proper and equitable and voted not to change it




      
      
      Presiding Officer
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Department of the Army Discharge Review Board in this case.

THE APPLICANT’S REQUEST AND STATEMENT:

1.  The applicant requests an upgrade of his discharge from general, under honorable conditions to honorable.

2.  The applicant states, in effect, he was discharged due to mental reasons and his period of service should have been characterized no less than honorable.  His discharge was influenced by an isolated Article 15 during 25 months of service. 

DISCHARGE UNDER REVIEW INFORMATION:

a. Application Receipt Date:		7 May 2013
b. Discharge received:			General, Under Honorable Conditions
c. Date of Discharge:			25 April 2003
d. Reason/Authority/SPD/RE:		Personality Disorder, AR 635-200, Chapter 5-13 						JFX, RE-3
e. Unit of assignment:			C Co, 2-12th Armor Regiment, Fort Hood, TX
f. Current Enlistment Date/Term:	23 March 2001, 6 years
g. Current Enlistment Service:	2 years, 1 month, 3 days
h. Total Service:			2 years, 1 month, 3 days
i. Time Lost:				None
j. Previous Discharges:		None
k. Highest Grade Achieved:		E-2
l.  Military Occupational Specialty:	19K10, M1 Armor Crewman
m. GT Score:				126
n. Education:				HS Graduate
o. Overseas Service:			None
p. Combat Service:			None
q. Decorations/Awards:		NDSM, ASR
r. Administrative Separation Board: 	No
s. Performance Ratings:		None
t. Counseling Statements:		No
u. Prior Board Review:			No

SUMMARY OF SERVICE:		

The applicant enlisted in the Regular Army on 23 March 2001 for a period of 6 years.  He was 23 years old at the time of entry and was a high school graduate.  He was trained in and awarded military occupational specialty (MOS) 19K10, M1 Armor Crewman.  His record does not contain any evidence of acts of valor or meritorious achievements; and he achieved the rank of PV2/E-2.  He was serving at Fort Hood, TX when his discharge was initiated.

SEPARATION FACTS AND CIRCUMSTANCES

1.  The evidence of record shows that on 17 March 2003, the applicant was diagnosed by competent medical authority with an antisocial personality disorder, which is characterized as a pervasive pattern of disregard for the rights of others and includes such traits as: deceitfulness, impulsivity, irritability and aggressiveness, consistent irresponsibility, and lack of remorse for having hurt or mistreated another.  

2.  On 4 April 2003, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of AR 635-200, Chapter 5, paragraph 5-13, by reason of a personality disorder.  He was diagnosed by a medically qualified psychiatrist with having a personality disorder. 

3.  The unit commander recommended a general, under honorable conditions discharge and advised the applicant of his rights.  

4.  On 4 April 2003, the applicant waived legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, and did not submit a statement in his own behalf.  The unit commander subsequently recommended separation from the Service.  The intermediate commander reviewed the proposed discharge action and recommended approval of the separation action with a general, under honorable conditions discharge.  

5.  On 11 April 2003, the separation authority directed the applicant’s discharge with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions.

6.  The applicant was discharged from the Army on 25 April 2003 with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions.

7.  The applicant’s service record does not contain any evidence of unauthorized absences or time lost.  

EVIDENCE OBTAINED FROM THE APPLICANT'S RECORD

1.  A DA Form 3822-R (Report of Mental Status Evaluation), dated 17 March 2003, which indicated the applicant was diagnosed with an antisocial personality disorder.

2.  The record does not contain any Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ) actions. 

EVIDENCE SUBMITTED BY THE APPLICANT 

The applicant provided a DD Form 293, a Summarized Article 15 and a DD Form 214.

POST-SERVICE ACTIVITY: 

The applicant did not provide any with his application.

REGULATORY AUTHORITY  

1.  Army Regulation 635-200 provides the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel.  Paragraph 5-13 in effect at the time, provided that a Soldier may be separated for a personality disorder, not amounting to disability, when the condition interfered with assignment to or performance of duty.  The regulation requires that the condition is a deeply ingrained maladaptive pattern of behavior of long duration that interferes with the Soldier's ability to perform military duties.  The regulation also directs that commanders will not take action prescribed in this Chapter in lieu of disciplinary action and requires that the disorder is so severe that the Soldier’s ability to function in the military environment is significantly impaired.

2.  Army policy requires the award of a fully honorable discharge in such case.  

3.  Characterization of service under honorable conditions may be awarded to a Soldier who has been convicted of an offense by general court-martial or who has been convicted by more than one special court-martial in the current enlistment, period of obligated service, or any extension thereof.

DISCUSSION AND RECOMMENDATION:

1.  The applicant’s request for an upgrade of the characterization of his discharge was carefully considered.  

2.  After carefully reviewing all of the applicant’s military records for the period of enlistment under review, the issue and documents he submitted, it appears that the characterization of service is improper.  

3.  The record confirms the applicant was discharged under the provisions of Chapter 5, paragraph 5-13, AR 635-200, by reason of a personality disorder with a general, under honorable conditions discharge.  Army Regulation 635-200, Chapter 5, paragraph 5-13, states that the service of a Soldier separated per this paragraph will be characterized as honorable unless an entry-level separation is required under Chapter 3, section III.  The applicant was not in entry level status and his service, per the governing regulation, should have been characterized as honorable.

4.  In view of the foregoing, the characterization of service being improper, recommend the Board grant relief in the form of an upgrade of the characterization of service to honorable.  However, the reason for discharge remains both proper and equitable.



SUMMARY OF ARMY DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING:

Type of Hearing:  Records Review     Date:  2 December 2013     Location:  Washington, DC

Did the Applicant Testify?  NA 

Counsel:  None

Witnesses/Observers:  NA 

Board Vote:
Character Change:  5	No Change:  0
Reason Change:	0	No Change:  5
(Board member names available upon request)

Board Action Directed:
Issue a new DD Form 214:		Yes
Change Characterization to:	Honorable
Change Reason to:			No Change
Change Authority for Separation:	NA
Change RE Code to:		NA
Grade Restoration to:		NA
Other:					NA




















Legend:
AMHRR - Army Military Human Resource Record	FG - Field Grade	IADT – Initial Active Duty Training	 	RE - Reentry
AWOL - Absent Without Leave	GD - General Discharge	NA - Not applicable	SCM- Summary Court Martial
BCD - Bad Conduct Discharge	HS - High School	NIF - Not in File	SPCM - Special Court Martial
CG - Company Grade Article 15	HD - Honorable Discharge	OAD - Ordered to Active Duty	UNC - Uncharacterized Discharge  
CID - Criminal investigation Department	MP – Military Police	OMPF - Official Military Personnel File	UOTHC - Under Other Than                           			               Honorable Conditions


ADRB Case Report and Directive (cont)		AR20130008999



Page 5 of 5 pages


ARMY DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (ADRB)

CASE REPORT AND DIRECTIVE



1


Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120010900

    Original file (AR20120010900.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The intermediate commander reviewed the proposed discharge action and recommended approval with an honorable discharge. On 18 November 2003, the separation authority directed the applicant’s discharge with a characterization of service of honorable. Board Action Directed Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: NA Other: NA RE Code: Grade Restoration: No Yes Grade: NA XI.

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2008 | AR20080006727

    Original file (AR20080006727.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of AR 635-200, Chapter 5, paragraph 5-13, by reason of personality disorder, for being diagnosed with a personality disorder of such severity that it impairs his ability to perform his daily military duties. On 14 December 1993, the separation authority directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of fully honorable. Board Action Directed President, Army...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130005467

    Original file (AR20130005467.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The evidence contained in the applicant’s service record indicates on 18 March 2003, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, paragraph 14-12c, AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct-commission of a serious offense for testing positive for illegal drugs (060530) and AWOL. On 31 March 2003, the separation authority waived further rehabilitation and directed the applicant’s discharge with a characterization of service of...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130000005

    Original file (AR20130000005.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Presiding Officer I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Department of the Army Discharge Review Board in this case. Discharge Received: Under Other Than Honorable Conditions c. Date of Discharge: 20 February 2002 d. Reason/Authority/SPD/RE Code: In Lieu of Trial by Court-Martial, AR 635-200, Chapter 10, KFS, RE-4 e. Unit of assignment: A Co, 4/64th AR, Fort Stewart, GA f. Current Enlistment Date/Term: 7 November 1995, 4 years g. Current...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2010 | AR20100012745

    Original file (AR20100012745.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? Yes No Counsel: None Witnesses/Observers: NA Exhibits Submitted: DD Form 149, self authored statement, DD Form 214, DD Form 214 Correction Memo VIII. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: No Change Other: NA RE Code: Grade Restoration: No Yes Grade: NA Legend: AWOL Absent Without Leave GCM General Court Martial NA Not applicable SCM Summary Court Martial BCD Bad Conduct...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060008864

    Original file (AR20060008864.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Current ENL Service: 03 Yrs, 08 Mos, 25 Days ????? The applicant declined consultation with legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, voluntarily waived consideration of his case by an administrative separation board, and did not submit a statement in his own behalf. The intermediate commander reviewed the proposed discharge action and recommended approval of the separation action with a general, under honorable conditions discharge.

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130009728

    Original file (AR20130009728.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Army Regulation 635-5-1 (Separation Program Designator (SPD) Codes) provides the specific authorities (regulatory or directive), reasons for separating Soldiers from active duty, and the SPD codes to be entered on the DD Form 214. However, Army Regulation 635-5-1 (Separation Program Designator (SPD) Codes) provides the specific authorities (regulatory or directive), reasons for separating Soldiers from active duty, and the SPD codes to be entered on the DD Form 214. Soldiers being...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2009 | AR20090010727

    Original file (AR20090010727.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Legal Basis for Separation: Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel. It is also noted that the characterization of service for this type of discharge is normally under other than honorable conditions and that the applicant was aware of that prior to requesting discharge. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: NA Other: NA RE Code: Grade...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2009 | AR20090009214

    Original file (AR20090009214.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, paragraph 14-12c, AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct—commission of a serious offense for the wrongful use of marijuana and cocaine between (040726 and 040826), with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. The intermediate commander reviewed the proposed discharge action and recommended approval of the separation...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2008 | AR20080013682

    Original file (AR20080013682.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 14 May 2007, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, paragraph 14-12a, AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct—for minor disciplinary infractions in that he disobeyed lawful orders, was disrespectful to NCOs, for writing checks with insufficient funds, and for missing formations, with a general under honorable conditions discharge. On 24...