IN THE CASE OF:  	Mr. 

      BOARD DATE:  	1 November 2013

      CASE NUMBER:  	AR20130008296
___________________________________________________________________________

Board Determination and Directed Action

After carefully examining the applicant's record of service during the period of enlistment under review, and considering the Discussion and Recommendation which follows, the Board determined the discharge was both proper and equitable and voted to deny relief.



      
      
      Presiding Officer
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Department of the Army Discharge Review Board in this case.

THE APPLICANT’S REQUEST AND STATEMENT:

1.  The applicant requests an upgrade of his discharge from general, under honorable conditions to honorable.

2.  The applicant states, in effect, that his discharge was the result of his non participation at military drills.  He contends he was caring for his mother at the time who is now deceased.

DISCHARGE UNDER REVIEW INFORMATION:

a. Application Receipt Date:			29 April 2013
b. Discharge Received:			General, Under Honorable Conditions
c. Date of Discharge:				26 December 2006
d. Reason/Authority/SPD/RE Code:		NIF/135-178
e. Unit of assignment:				HHD, 2nd Bn, 321st Regt, 1st Bde, 108th Div 							(IT), Perrine, FL
f. Current Enlistment Date/Term:		19 April 2004, 6 years
g. Current Enlistment Service:		2 years, 8 months, 8 days
h. Total Service:				28 years, 6 months, 6 days
i. Time Lost:					None
j. Previous Discharges:			USAR-780621-790115/NA											RA-790116-810719/HD											RA-810720-841202/HD											RA-841203-890808/HD											RA-890809-920731/HD											USAR-920801-970722/NA											USAR-970723-040418/NA											 (Concurrent Service)
k. Highest Grade Achieved:			E-6
l. Military Occupational Specialty:		92Y30, Supply Sergeant
m. GT Score:					111
n. Education:					HS Graduate
o. Overseas Service:				Germany (During prior period of service in RA)
p. Combat Service:				None
q. Decorations/Awards:			ARCOM, AAM-4, AGCM-4, NDSM-2, NPDR-3 							OSR-3
r. Administrative Separation Board: 		No
s. Performance Ratings:			Yes
t. Counseling Statements:			None
u. Prior Board Review:				No

SUMMARY OF SERVICE:

The applicant enlisted in the United States Army Reserve (USAR)/delayed entry program 21 June 1978.  On 15 January 1979, he was discharged from the delayed entry program for enlistment in the Regular Army.  The applicant enlisted in the Regular Army on 16 January 1979, for a period of 3 years.  His record indicates he reenlisted for three periods of service while in the Regular Army.  He was discharged from the Regular Army on 31 July 1992, and immediately enlisting in the USAR on 1 August 1992.  He served continually until 18 April 2004.  On 19 April 2004, he reenlisted, again, in the USAR, for a period of 6 years.  He achieved the rank of SSG/E-6; served in Germany during a prior period of service.  He earned several awards which include an ARCOM, four AAM's, and four AGCM's.  He completed 28 years, 6 months, and 6 days of military service.

SEPARATION FACTS AND CIRCUMSTANCES:

1.  The applicant’s service record is void of the specific facts and circumstances concerning the events which led to his discharge from the United States Army Reserve.  

2.  The available evidence in the record indicates that on 27 November 2006, DA, HQS, 108th Division (Institutional Training), Charlotte, NC, Orders Number 06-331-00010, discharged the applicant from the United States Army Reserve, effective 26 December 2006, with a general, under honorable conditions discharge.  The applicant was discharged under the provisions of AR 135-178.

3.  The applicant’s available service record does not contain any evidence of unauthorized absences or time lost.

EVIDENCE OBTAINED FROM THE APPLICANT'S RECORD:

1.  Discharge Orders 06-331-00010, dated 27 November 2006.

2.  The record contains a NCO Evaluation Report (NCOER), covering the period of May 2004 through April 2005.  The applicant received a "Fully Capable" rating on the report.  

3.  The applicant’s available record does not contain any recorded actions under the UCMJ or counseling statements.  

EVIDENCE SUBMITTED BY THE APPLICANT:

The applicant provided a DD Form 293.

POST-SERVICE ACTIVITY: 

None provided by the applicant.


REGULATORY AUTHORITY:

1.  Army Regulation 135-178 sets forth the policies, standards, and procedures to ensure the readiness and competency of the U.S. Army while providing for the orderly administrative separation of Army National Guard and U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) enlisted Soldiers for a variety of reasons. The separation policies throughout the different Chapters in this regulation promote the readiness of the Army by providing an orderly means to judge the suitability of persons to serve on the basis of their conduct and their ability to meet required standards of duty performance and discipline.  Specific categories include minor disciplinary infractions, a pattern of misconduct, and commission of a serious offense, to include abuse of illegal drugs, and convictions by civil authorities.  

2.  The characterization is based upon the quality of the Soldier’s service, including the reason for separation and determined in accordance with standards of acceptable personal conduct and performance of duty as found in the UCMJ, Army Regulations, and the time-honored customs and traditions of the Army.  The reasons for separation, including the specific circumstances that form the basis for the discharge are considered on the issue of characterization. 

3.  Possible characterizations of service include an honorable, general, under honorable conditions, under other than honorable conditions, or uncharacterized if the Soldier is in entry-level status.  However, the permissible range of characterization varies based on the reason for separation.

DISCUSSION AND RECOMMENDATION:

1.  The applicant’s request for an upgrade of the characterization of his discharge was carefully considered.  However, after examining the applicant’s record of service, his available military records, the document and the issues submitted with the application, there are insufficient mitigating factors to merit an upgrade of the applicant's discharge.  

2.  The applicant’s record is void of the specific facts and circumstances concerning the events which led to his discharge from the U.S. Army Reserves.  However, the record shows that on 
27 November 2006, DA, HQS, 108th Division (Institutional Training), Charlotte, NC, Orders Number 06-331-00010, discharged the applicant from the United States Army Reserve, effective 26 December 2006, with a general, under honorable conditions discharge.  

3.  Barring evidence to the contrary, the presumption of government regularity shall prevail, as it appears that all the requirements of law and regulation were met and the rights of the applicant were fully protected throughout the separation process.  

4.  The applicant's contentions that his discharge was the result of him having to care for his mother at the time of discharge was carefully considered.  However, there is a presumption of regularity in the conduct of governmental affairs that shall be applied in any review unless there is substantial credible evidence to rebut the presumption.  The applicant bears the burden of overcoming this presumption through the presentation of substantial and credible evidence to support this issue.  There is no evidence in the record, nor has the applicant produced any evidence to support the contention that his discharge was the result of his care for his mother.  The applicant’s statement alone does not overcome the government’s presumption of regularity and no additional corroborating and supporting documentation or further evidence has been provided with the request for an upgrade of the discharge.   

5.  If the applicant desires a personal appearance hearing, it will be his responsibility to meet the burden of proof and provide the appropriate documents (i.e., the discharge packet) or other evidence sufficient to explain the facts, circumstances, and reasons underlying the separation action, for the Board’s consideration because they are not available in the official record.

6.  Therefore, based on the available evidence and the government presumption of regularity, it appears the reason for discharge and the characterization of service are both proper and equitable, thus recommend the Board deny relief.

SUMMARY OF ARMY DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING:

Type of Hearing: Records Review     Date:  1 November 2013      Location: Washington, DC

Did the Applicant Testify?  No 

Counsel:  None

Witnesses/Observers:  NA 

Board Vote:
Character Change:  1	No Change:  4
Reason Change:	0	No Change:  5
(Board member names available upon request)

Board Action Directed:
Issue a new DD Form 214:		No
Change Characterization to:	No Change
Change Reason to:			No Change
Change Authority for Separation:	NA
Change RE Code to:		NA
Grade Restoration to:		NA
Other:					NA




Legend:
AMHRR - Army Military Human Resource Record	FG - Field Grade	IADT – Initial Active Duty Training	 	RE - Reentry
AWOL - Absent Without Leave	GD - General Discharge	NA - Not applicable	SCM- Summary Court Martial
BCD - Bad Conduct Discharge	HS - High School	NIF - Not in File	SPCM - Special Court Martial
CG - Company Grade Article 15	HD - Honorable Discharge	OAD - Ordered to Active Duty	UNC - Uncharacterized Discharge  
CID - Criminal investigation Department	MP – Military Police	OMPF - Official Military Personnel File	UOTHC - Under Other Than                           			               Honorable Conditions


ADRB Case Report and Directive (cont)		AR20130008296



Page 2 of 5 pages


ARMY DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (ADRB)

CASE REPORT AND DIRECTIVE



1