IN THE CASE OF: Mr.
BOARD DATE: 15 May 2013
CASE NUMBER: AR20130001356
___________________________________________________________________________
Board Determination and Directed Action
After carefully examining the applicants record of service during the period of enlistment under review and considering the Discussion and Recommendation which follows, the Board determined that the characterization of service was too harsh based on the overall length and quality of the applicants service and his combat service, and as a result it is inequitable. Accordingly, the Board voted to grant full relief in the form of an upgrade of the characterization of service to honorable.
Presiding Officer
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Department of the Army Discharge Review Board in this case.
THE APPLICANTS REQUEST AND STATEMENT:
1. The applicant requests his general, under honorable conditions discharge be upgraded to honorable.
2. The applicant states, in effect, that he would like an upgrade of his discharge so he will be able to continue his education by using his GI Bill benefits that he paid into. He contends he served for 4 1/2 years to include a deployment to Iraq. He received no Article 15s and was discharged for only failing to meet physical training (PT) test standards.
DISCHARGE UNDER REVIEW INFORMATION:
a. Application Receipt Date: 18 January 2013
b. Discharge received: General, Under Honorable Conditions
c. Date of Discharge: 13 October 2012
d. Reason/Authority/SPD/RE: Physical Standards, AR 635-200, Chapter 13, paragraph 13-2e, JFT, RE-3
e. Unit of assignment: HHB, 2nd Bn, 1st ADA, APO AP
f. Current Enlistment Date/Term: 28 May 2008, 4 years and 40 weeks
g. Current Enlistment Service: 4 years, 4 months, 16 days
h. Total Service: 4 years, 4 months, 16 days
i. Time Lost: None
j. Previous Discharges: None
k. Highest Grade Achieved: E-4
l. Military Occupational Specialty: 14E10, Patriot Fire Control Operator
m. GT Score: 108
n. Education: HS Graduate
o. Overseas Service: Southwest Asia
p. Combat Service: Iraq (090722-100220)
q. Decorations/Awards: AAM, AGCM, ICM-w/CS, NDSM, GWOTSM, KDSM, ASR, OSR-2, MUC
r. Administrative Separation Board: No
s. Performance Ratings: None
t. Counseling Statements: None
u. Prior Board Review: No
SUMMARY OF SERVICE:
The applicant enlisted in the Regular Army on 28 May 2008 for a period of 4 years and 40 weeks. He was 19 years old at the time of entry and a high school graduate. He served in Iraq and Korea. He earned an AAM and an AGCM and completed 4 years, 4 months, and 16 days of total active duty service.
SEPARATION FACTS AND CIRCUMSTANCES:
1. The applicants service record shows that on 5 September 2012, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 13, AR 635-200, by reason of unsatisfactory performance for failing two Army Physical Fitness Test (APFT) on 22 November 2011 and 14 March 2012.
2. The unit commander recommended a general, under honorable conditions discharge and advised the applicant of his rights.
3. On 5 September 2012, the applicant consulted with legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, and submitted a statement on his behalf. The unit commander subsequently recommended separation from the Army and waiver of further rehabilitative efforts.
4. The separation authority waived further rehabilitation and directed the applicants discharge with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. The applicant was transferred to the U.S. Army Reserve Control Group.
5. The applicant was discharged from the Army on 13 October 2012, with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions under the provisions of Chapter 13, paragraph 13-2e, AR 635-200, for physical standards, with a Separation Program Designator code (SPD) of JFT and an RE code of 3.
6. The applicants service record does not contain any evidence of unauthorized absences or time lost.
EVIDENCE OBTAINED FROM THE APPLICANT'S RECORD:
There are no counseling statements or UCMJ actions in the record.
EVIDENCE SUBMITTED BY THE APPLICANT:
The applicant provided no additional documents.
POST-SERVICE ACTIVITY:
None were provided with the application.
REGULATORY AUTHORITY:
1. Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the requirements and procedures for administrative discharge of enlisted personnel. Chapter 13-2e states in pertinent part, that separation proceedings will be initiated for Soldiers without medical limitations who have two consecutive failures of the Army Physical Fitness Test. The reason for discharge will be shown as physical standards.
2. The service of Soldiers separated because of unsatisfactory performance for failure to meet physical standards will be characterized as honorable or general, under honorable conditions.
3. Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 3-7a, provides that an honorable discharge is a separation with honor and entitles the recipient to benefits provided by law. The honorable characterization is appropriate when the quality of the members service generally has met the standards of acceptable conduct and performance of duty for Army personnel, or is otherwise so meritorious that any other characterization would be clearly inappropriate. Whenever there is doubt, it is to be resolved in favor of the individual.
4. Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 3-7b, provides that a general discharge is a separation from the Army under honorable conditions. When authorized, it is issued to a Soldier whose military record is satisfactory but not sufficiently meritorious to warrant an honorable discharge. A characterization of under honorable conditions may be issued only when the reason for the Soldiers separation specifically allows such characterization.
DISCUSSION AND RECOMMENDATION:
1. The applicants request for an upgrade of the characterization of his discharge was carefully considered.
2. After examining the applicants record of service, his military records, the documents and the issues submitted with the application, there are several mitigating factors to merit an upgrade of the applicant's discharge to honorable; the applicant was discharged for the sole reason of failing to meet the minimum standards of the Army Physical Fitness Test (APFT). The service record does not contain any other derogatory information and it shows the preponderance of the applicants service was honorable. He earned an AAM, AGCM and served a 14-month combat tour in Iraq.
3. The record shows the proper discharge and separation authority procedures were followed in this case.
4. In view of the foregoing, it appears the characterization of the discharge is now inequitable and it is recommended the Board grant full relief in the form of an upgrade of the characterization of service to honorable.
SUMMARY OF ARMY DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING:
Type of Hearing: Records Review Date: 15 May 2013 Location: Washington, DC
Did the Applicant Testify? NA
Counsel: None
Witnesses/Observers: NA
Board Vote:
Character Change: 5 No Change: 0
Reason Change: 0 No Change: 5
(Board member names available upon request)
Board Action Directed:
Issue a new DD Form 214: Yes
Change Characterization to: Honorable
Change Reason to: No Change
Change Authority for Separation: No Change
Change RE Code to: No Change
Grade Restoration to: NA
Other: NA
Legend:
AMHRR - Army Military Human Resource Record FG - Field Grade IADT Initial Active Duty Training RE - Reentry
AWOL - Absent Without Leave GD - General Discharge NA - Not applicable SCM- Summary Court Martial
BCD - Bad Conduct Discharge HS - High School NIF - Not in File SPCM - Special Court Martial
CG - Company Grade Article 15 HD - Honorable Discharge OAD - Ordered to Active Duty UNC - Uncharacterized Discharge
CID - Criminal investigation Department MP Military Police OMPF - Official Military Personnel File UOTHC - Under Other Than Honorable Conditions
ADRB Case Report and Directive (cont) AR20130001356
Page 5 of 5 pages
ARMY DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (ADRB)
CASE REPORT AND DIRECTIVE
1
ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130012282
After carefully examining the applicants record of service during the period of enlistment under review and considering the Discussion and Recommendation which follows, the Board determined that the characterization of service was too harsh based on the overall quality of the applicants service and his combat service, and as a result it is inequitable. On 23 April 2012, the separation authority waived further rehabilitation and directed the applicants discharge with a characterization of...
ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130003953
After carefully examining the applicants record of service during the period of enlistment under review and the Discussion and Recommendation which follows, the Board determined the characterization of service is too harsh and as a result it is inequitable based on the following reasons: a. overall length and quality (i.e., ARCOM, AAM, and AGCM) of the applicants service to include his combat service and his DD Form 214 shows he completed 6 years, 4 months and 14 days of active military...
ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120005942
Applicant Request: Upgrade Reason Change RE Code Change Issues: The applicant states, in effect, that he received a Chapter 13 and discharged under a general discharge for failure of two consecutive physical fitness tests; he was not given an opportunity for a change in unit; he has never received an Article 15 in his whole career in the Army; and he has received the Army Good Conduct Medal for every three years of service. Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 9...
ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130010072
The applicants service record shows that the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 13, AR 635-200, by reason of unsatisfactory performance specifically for failing two consecutive record Army Physical Fitness Tests on 25 April 2012, and 13 August 2012. On 4 December 2012, the separation authority waived further rehabilitation and directed the applicants discharge with a characterization of service of honorable conditions. ...
ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130006672
IN THE CASE OF: Mr. BOARD DATE: 20 November 2013 CASE NUMBER: AR20130006672 ___________________________________________________________________________ Board Determination and Directed Action After carefully examining the applicants record of service during the period of enlistment under review and considering the Discussion and Recommendation which follows, the Board determined that the characterization of service was too harsh based on the overall length, quality of the applicants...
ARMY | DRB | CY2014 | AR20140003607
After carefully examining the applicants record of service during the period of enlistment under review, and notwithstanding the examiners Discussion and Recommendation which follows, the Board determined that the applicant's service and the circumstances surrounding the discharge (no derogatory information) were not significantly meritorious to overcome the events that caused his separation from the Army, and as a result, the discharge was found to be proper and equitable. On 3 December...
ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110018672
Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 18 April 2011, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 13, AR 635-200, by reason of unsatisfactory performance for failing two consecutive Army Physical Fitness Tests (APFTs), with a fully honorable discharge. On 27 April 2011, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be separated, with a general, under...
ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130008395
IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 25 October 2013 CASE NUMBER: AR20130008395 ___________________________________________________________________________ Board Determination and Directed Action After carefully examining the applicants record of service during the period of enlistment under review, and considering the Discussion and Recommendation which follows, the Board determined the characterization of service was too harsh based on the record confirms that the applicant was discharged for the...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | AR20120000751
Applicant Name: ????? The DD Form 214, indicates that the applicant was discharged under the provisions of Chapter 13-2f, AR 635-200, by reason of physical standards, with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. Board Action Directed Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: ?????
ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130002511
Presiding Officer I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Department of the Army Discharge Review Board in this case. On 27 June 2012, the separation authority approved and directed the applicants discharge with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. After examining the applicants record of service, his military records, and the issues submitted with the application, there are several mitigating factors to...