Applicant Name: ?????
Application Receipt Date: 2012/05/21 Prior Review: Prior Review Date: NA
I. Applicant Request: Upgrade Reason Change RE Code Change
Issues: The applicant states, "I have served my country well [sic] but [sic] due to events that happened I would like to change my status so that i my better myself as a civilian."
II. Were Proper Discharge and Separation Authority procedures followed?
Tender Offer: NA
See Attachments: Legal Medical Minority Opinion Exhibits
III. Discharge Under Review
Unit CDR Recommended Discharge: Date: 120124
Discharge Received: Date: 120214 Chapter: 14-12b AR: 635-200
Reason: Pattern of Misconduct RE: SPD: JKA Unit/Location: 92d Military Police Company, 95th Military Police Battalion, United States Army Garrison-Baumholder, APO AE
Time Lost: None
Article 15s (Charges/Dates/Punishment): 101124, violated a lawful general regulation by wrongfully failing to maintain a valid registration for his vehicle (101027); reduction to E-3, suspended, to be automatically remitted if not vacated (110523); forfeiture of $423, suspended, to be automatically remitted if not vacated (110523); extra duty for 14 days; (CG).
111121, derelict in the performance of his duties by willfully failing to adhere to the laws he was charged with enforcing by driving 80KM/H in a 30 KM/H zone while on duty as a military police officer (110915); violated a lawful general regulation by wrongfully operating his vehicle with a BAC of .0665 grams per milliliter of blood (111023); with intent to deceive, made a false official statement (110916); without authority, through neglect damaged by hitting a rock in a military police care, the amount of said damage being in the sum of $1000.00 (110915); reduction to E-1; forfeiture of $500 pay per month for 2 months; extra duty for 45 days; (FG).
Courts-Martial (Charges/Dates/Punishment): None
Counseling Records Available: Yes No
IV. Soldiers Overall Record
Age at current enlistment: 19
Current ENL Date: 080508 Current ENL Term: 5 Years ?????
Current ENL Service: 3 Yrs, 9 Mos, 7 Days ?????
Total Service: 3 Yrs, 9 Mos, 7 Days ?????
Previous Discharges: None
Highest Grade: E-4 Performance Ratings Available: Yes No
MOS: 31B10 Military Police GT: 86 EDU: HS Grad Overseas: SWA Combat: Afghanistan (090615 - 100615)
Decorations/Awards: NDSM, ACM w/2CS, GWOTSM, ASR, OSR
V. Post-Discharge Activity
City, State:
Post Service Accomplishments: None
VI. Facts, Circumstances, and Legal Basis for Separation
a. Facts and Circumstances:
The evidence of record shows that on 24 January 2012, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, paragraph 14-12b, AR 635-200, by reason of a pattern of misconduct for being counseled for reporting for work call while under the influence of alcohol (101005); being counseled for missing appointments at the Baumholder Dental Clinic (110915); being counseled for driving while under administrative orders revoking his driving privileges and for leaving the Bauntholder cantonment while under orders not to (120102); receiving a Company Grade Article 15 for failing to maintain a valid registration on his POV (101124); receiving a Field Grade Article 15 for speeding, driving while intoxicated, making a false official statement, and causing damage to military property (111121), with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. He was advised of his rights.
On 1 February 2012, the applicant consulted with legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, and did not submit a statement in his own behalf. The unit commander subsequently recommended separation from the Army and waiver of further rehabilitative efforts. The intermediate commander reviewed the proposed action and recommended approval of the separation with a general, under honorable conditions discharge.
On 2 February 2012, the separation authority waived further rehabilitation and directed the applicants discharge with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions.
The record contains military police report 02937-2010-MPC167 and 02731-2010-MPC167.
b. Legal Basis for Separation:
Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel. Chapter 14 establishes policy and prescribes procedures for separating members for misconduct. Specific categories include minor disciplinary infractions, a pattern of misconduct, and commission of a serious offense, to include abuse of illegal drugs, convictions by civil authorities and desertion or being absent without leave. Action will be taken to separate a member for misconduct when it is clearly established that rehabilitation is impractical or unlikely to succeed. Army policy states that an under other than honorable conditions discharge is normally considered appropriate; however, a general, under honorable conditions or an honorable discharge may be granted.
c. Response to Issues, Recommendation and Rationale:
After a careful review of all the applicants military records, the issue and documents submitted with the application, the analyst found no mitigating factors which would merit an upgrade of the applicant's discharge.
The analyst determined that the applicants discharge was appropriate because the quality of service was not consistent with the Army's standards for acceptable personal conduct and performance of duty by military personnel. By the misconduct, the applicant diminished the quality of the former Soldiers service below that meriting a fully honorable discharge.
The applicant provided no independent corroborating evidence demonstrating that either the command's action was erroneous or that the applicants service mitigated the misconduct or poor duty performance.
Therefore, the analyst determined the reason for discharge and the characterization of service were both proper and equitable and recommends to the Board to deny relief.
VII. Summary of Army Discharge Review Board Hearing
Type of Hearing: Date: 12 October 2012 Location: Washington, D. C.
Did the Applicant Testify? Yes No
Counsel: None
Witnesses/Observers: None
Exhibits Submitted: On-line Application and a DD Form 214
VIII. Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation
After carefully examining the applicants record of service during the period of enlistment under review and considering the analysts recommendation and rationale, the Board determined that the discharge was both proper and equitable and voted to deny relief.
IX. Board Decision
Board Vote:
Character - Change 0 No change 5
Reason - Change 0 No change 5
(Board member names available upon request)
X. Board Action Directed
Issue a new DD Form 214
Change Characterization to:
Change Reason to: No Change
Other: NA
RE Code:
Grade Restoration: No Yes Grade: NA
XI. Certification Signature
Approval Authority:
ARCHIE L. DAVIS III
Colonel, U.S. Army
President, Army Discharge Review Board
BONITA E. TROTMAN
Lieutenant Colonel, U. S. Army
Secretary Recorder
???
Legend:
AWOL Absent Without Leave GCM General Court Martial NA Not applicable SCM Summary Court Martial
BCD Bad Conduct Discharge GD General Discharge NIF Not in the file SPCM Special Court Martial
CG Company Grade Article 15 HD Honorable Discharge OAD Ordered to Active Duty UNC Uncharacterized Discharge
DD Dishonorable Discharge HS High School Graduate OMPF Official Military Personnel File UOTH Under Other Than Honorable
FG Field Grade Article 15 IADT Initial Active Duty Training RE Reentry Code Conditions
ARMY DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD - CASE REPORT AND DIRECTIVE
Case Number AR20120009684
______________________________________________________________________________
Page 3 of 3 pages
ARMY | DRB | CY2008 | AR20080016145
Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 17 July 2006, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, Paragraph 14-12c, AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct-commission of a serious offense for wrongful use of cocaine between (040810-040823), driving while intoxicated (051217), AWOL (060201-060203), wrongfully operate a vehicle without a valid USAREUR license (060423), and made a false official statement to...
ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110012940
Further, the DD Form 214 indicates the applicant was discharged under the provisions of Chapter 14, AR 635-200, paragraph 14-12c by reason of misconduct, with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. The DD Form 214 indicates the applicant was discharged under the provisions of Chapter 14, AR 635-200, paragraph 14-12c by reason of misconduct, serious offense with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. Yes No Counsel:...
ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120009887
Applicant Name: ????? On 3 March 2011, the separation authority waived further rehabilitation and directed the applicants discharge with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. However, the record shows that the applicant was discharged for wrongfully using illegal drugs; the fact that he signed a declination statement had nothing to do with the reason for his discharge.
ARMY | DRB | CY2008 | AR20080018628
Applicant Name: ????? On 29 April 2008, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: NA Other: NA RE Code: Grade Restoration: No Yes Grade: NA ARMY DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD - CASE REPORT AND DIRECTIVE Case Number...
ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130015412
On 7 May 2012, the unit commander notified the applicant of his intent to process him for separation under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 14-12c, by reason of misconduct, commission of a serious offense; specifically for being cited for driving under the influence (DUI), reckless driving, and super speeding. The separation authority waived further rehabilitation and directed the applicants discharge with a characterization of service of general, under honorable...
ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120005974
Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 17 June 2011, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, paragraph 14-12c(2), AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct-commission of a serious offense for testing positive for marijuana (110526); failing to go at the time to his appointed place of duty x 3, being derelict in performing his duties x 4, violating a lawful general regulation by driving his government...
ARMY | DRB | CY2008 | AR20080015308
Applicant Name: ????? The intermediate commander reviewed the proposed discharge action and recommended approval of the separation action with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. On 11 February 1998, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions.
ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120003315
Applicant Name: ????? On 17 November 2010, the separation authority waived further rehabilitation and directed the applicants discharge with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. Certification Signature Approval Authority: ARCHIE L. DAVIS III Colonel, U.S. Army President, Army Discharge Review Board BONITA E. TROTMAN Lieutenant Colonel, U. S. Army Secretary Recorder Legend: AWOL Absent Without Leave GCM General Court Martial NA Not applicable SCM Summary...
ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120007598
Applicant Name: ????? On 11 October 2011, the separation authority approved the Chapter 10 request and directed an under other than honorable conditions discharge. However, the applicant was charged with AWOL and while still in an entry-level status voluntarily requested discharge under the provisions of Chapter 10, AR 635-200, in lieu of trial by court-martial.
ARMY | DRB | CY2010 | AR20100022924
Applicant Name: ????? The unit commander recommended separation with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation After carefully examining the applicants record of service during the period of enlistment under review and considering the analysts recommendation and rationale, the Board determined that the discharge was both proper and equitable and voted to deny relief.