Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110019683
Original file (AR20110019683.txt) Auto-classification: Denied
Applicant Name:  ?????

Application Receipt Date: 2011/09/26	Prior Review:     Prior Review Date: NA     

I.  Applicant Request:  Upgrade     Reason Change     RE Code Change    

Issues: The applicant states, in effect, that he was young and made some poor decisions but would like an upgrade of his discharge and a change to his reentry code in order to rejoin the Army and get a second chance.

II.  Were Proper Discharge and Separation Authority procedures followed?	     
Tender Offer:   NA

See Attachments:  Legal     Medical     Minority Opinion     Exhibits 

III.  Discharge Under Review
Unit CDR Recommended Discharge: 	   Date: 090128
Discharge Received: 			   Date: 090212   Chapter: 14-12c(1)    AR: 635-200
Reason: Misconduct (AWOL)	   RE:     SPD: JKD   Unit/Location: B Co, 187 OD Bn, Fort Jackson, SC 

Time Lost: 50 days.  AWOL for 2 days (081114-081115), AWOL for 48 days (081218-090203), returned to his unit.

Article 15s (Charges/Dates/Punishment): 090115, AWOL (081217-090103), failed to report (081213), forfeiture of $699 for two months, 45 days of extra duty and restriction (FG)

Courts-Martial (Charges/Dates/Punishment): None

Counseling Records Available: Yes    No 

IV.  Soldier’s Overall Record
Age at current enlistment:  18
Current ENL Date: 080702    Current ENL Term: 3 Years  ?????
Current ENL Service: 	00 Yrs, 05 Mos, 23 Days ?????
Total Service:  		00 Yrs, 05 Mos, 23 Days ?????
Previous Discharges: 	None
Highest Grade: E-1		Performance Ratings Available: Yes    No 
MOS: None   GT: 105   EDU: HS Grad   Overseas: None   Combat: None
Decorations/Awards: NDSM

V.  Post-Discharge Activity
City, State:  Terrell, TX
Post Service Accomplishments: None listed

VI.  Facts, Circumstances, and Legal Basis for Separation

       a.  Facts and Circumstances:
       The evidence of record shows that on 28 January 2009, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, paragraph 14-12c(1), AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct—commission  of a serious offense, for going absent without leave (081217-090103), with a general, under honorable conditions discharge.  He was advised of his rights.  
       
       On 29 January 2009, the applicant waived legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action and did not submit a statement in his own behalf.  The unit commander subsequently recommended separation from the Army and waiver of further rehabilitative efforts.  The intermediate commander reviewed the proposed action and recommended approval of the separation with a general, under honorable conditions discharge.  
       
       On 5 February 2009, the separation authority waived further rehabilitation and directed the applicant’s discharge with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions.
       
       On 12 February 2009, the applicant was appropriately issued a DD Form 214 which shows a discharge from the Army with service uncharacterized.  At the time of his separation, he had completed 5 months and 23 days on active duty; thus, he was in entry level status.

       b.  Legal Basis for Separation:  
       Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel.  Chapter 14 of this regulation establishes policy and prescribes procedures for separating members for misconduct.  Specific categories include minor disciplinary infractions, a pattern of misconduct, and commission of a serious offense, to include abuse of illegal drugs, convictions by civil authorities and desertion or absence without leave.  Action will be taken to separate a service member for misconduct when it is clearly established that rehabilitation is impractical or unlikely to succeed.  Army policy states that an under other than honorable conditions discharge is normally considered appropriate; however, a general, under honorable conditions or an honorable discharge may be granted.   

       c.  Response to Issues, Recommendation and Rationale:  
       After a careful review of all the applicant’s military records, and the issue and documents submitted with the application, the analyst found no mitigating factors which would merit an upgrade of the applicant's discharge.  The analyst noted from the evidence of record that the applicant received an uncharacterized separation because he was in entry-level status (ELS).  
       
       The separation authority approved the applicant’s separation with a general, under honorable conditions discharge.  However, since he was in entry level status, he was not authorized such a characterization and was appropriately issued an uncharacterized discharge.   Army Regulation 635-200 provides in pertinent part, that a Soldier is in entry-level status for the first 180 days of continuous active duty.  The purpose of the entry-level status is to provide the Soldier a probationary period.  Soldiers who are found to lack the necessary motivation, adaptability, self-discipline, ability, or attitude to become productive Soldiers may be expeditiously separated while in entry-level status.  Army Regulation 635-200 also provides, except in cases of serious misconduct, that a Soldier’s service will be uncharacterized when the separation is initiated while the Soldier is in entry level status.  
       
       A general, under honorable conditions discharge is not authorized under ELS conditions and a fully honorable discharge may be granted only in cases which are clearly warranted by unusual circumstances involving outstanding personal conduct and/or performance of duty.  The analyst determined no such unusual circumstances were present in the applicant’s record and the former Soldier’s service did not warrant an honorable discharge.   
       
       Furthermore, the analyst noted that the applicant met entrance qualification standards to include age.  There is no evidence that the applicant was any less mature than other Soldiers of the same age who successfully completed military service.
       
       Additionally, the applicant was appropriately assigned a reentry code of 3, if reenlistment is desired; the applicant should contact the local recruiter to determine eligibility to reenlist.  Those individuals can best advise a former service member as to the needs of the Army at the time, and are required to process waivers of reentry eligibility (RE) codes.  
       
       Therefore, the analyst determined the reason for discharge, the characterization of his service and the reentry code were all proper and equitable and recommends to the Board to deny relief.
       
       
       
       
       
       
       

VII.  Summary of Army Discharge Review Board Hearing

Type of Hearing: 		Date: 23 March 2012         Location: Washington, DC

Did the Applicant Testify?  Yes     No  

Counsel: None

Witnesses/Observers: NA 

Exhibits Submitted: DD Form 214, discharge packet, ERB, letter of resignation, birth certificate and APFT card.

VIII.  Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation
After carefully examining the applicant's record of service during the period of enlistment under review and considering the analyst's recommendation and rationale, the Board determined that the discharge was both proper and equitable and voted to deny relief.
        
IX.  Board Decision						
Board Vote:
Character - Change 0    No change 5
Reason -     Change 0    No change 5
(Board member names available upon request)

X.  Board Action Directed
Issue a new DD Form 214  
Change Characterization to: 
Change Reason to: NA
Other: NA
RE Code: 
Grade Restoration:   No   Yes   Grade: NA

XI.  Certification Signature
Approval Authority:




EDGAR J. YANGER
Colonel, U.S. Army
President, Army Discharge Review Board




BONITA E. TROTMAN
Lieutenant Colonel, U. S. Army
Secretary Recorder
?????



Legend:
AWOL    	Absent Without Leave		GCM   General Court Martial	NA   Not applicable			SCM	Summary Court Martial
BCD   	Bad Conduct Discharge	GD      General Discharge	NIF   Not in the file			SPCM	Special Court Martial
CG 	Company Grade Article 15	HD      Honorable Discharge	OAD   Ordered to Active Duty		UNC	Uncharacterized Discharge  
DD 	Dishonorable Discharge	HS       High School Graduate	OMPF   Official Military Personnel File	UOTH  	Under Other Than Honorable 
FG	Field Grade Article 15		IADT   Initial Active Duty Training	RE     Reentry Code				Conditions 
ARMY DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD - CASE REPORT AND DIRECTIVE

Case Number AR20110019683
______________________________________________________________________________


Page 1 of 3 pages

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2010 | AR20100017773

    Original file (AR20100017773.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? The evidence of record supports that the applicant was discharged from active duty, under the provisions of Chapter 10, Army Regulation 635-200, in lieu of trial by court-martial, where the separation authority approved a general, under honorable conditions discharge. AR 635-200 stipulates Soldiers being separated while in an entry level status will be awarded an uncharacterized separation of service, which an other than honorable conditions discharge is normally...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2009 | AR20090001338

    Original file (AR20090001338.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 18 November 2004, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 11, AR 635-200, by reason of entry level performance and conduct for lack of motivation and adjustment disorder, with an uncharacterized discharge. c. Response to Issues, Recommendation and Rationale: After a careful review of the applicant’s military records, and the issue and documents submitted with...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2010 | AR20100019640

    Original file (AR20100019640.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 4 June 2009, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed the applicant’s discharge with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. However, in review of the applicant's available service record, the analyst found that this medical condition did not overcome the reason for discharge and characterization of service granted. Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation After carefully examining the applicant’s record of...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | AR20120000276

    Original file (AR20120000276.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? On 11 February 2010, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed the applicant’s discharge with a characterization of service of general under honorable conditions discharge. The narrative reason specified by Army Regulations for a discharge under this paragraph is "Misconduct (Drug Abuse)", the separation code is "JKK", and the reentry code is "RE 4".

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2010 | AR20100025898

    Original file (AR20100025898.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 16 June 2009, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. By abusing illegal drugs, the applicant knowingly risked a military career and diminished the quality of his service below that meriting a fully honorable honorable discharge. There is no evidence in the record, nor has the applicant provided any evidence, to support his contention that the...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2009 | AR20090012243

    Original file (AR20090012243.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? The regulation also directs that commanders will not take action prescribed in this Chapter in lieu of disciplinary action; requires that the diagnosis concludes the disorder is so severe that the Soldier’s ability to function in the military environment is significantly impaired; and states that separation for personality disorder is not appropriate when separation is warranted under Chapter 4, 5, 7, 9, 10, 11, 13, 14, or 15; Army Regulation 604-10 or Army Regulation...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2010 | AR20100025714

    Original file (AR20100025714.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 17 September 2009, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14-12c, AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct-commission of a serious offense; in that he went AWOL for over thirty days, with a entry level uncharacterized discharge. The analyst noted the applicant's issue that his discharge was improper because it was less than 180 days of active service and he needs an...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2009 | AR20090012041

    Original file (AR20090012041.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 3 February 2009, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. Yes No Counsel: NA Witnesses/Observers: NA Exhibits Submitted: The applicant submitted the follwing documents: DD Form 149, dated (090701); Statement from Applicant's Mother, dated (090701); Letter Citing Attachments; Timeline of Events; Letter from Commanding General, Fort Jackson, SC,...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2010 | AR20100001012

    Original file (AR20100001012.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 11, AR 635-200, by reason of entry level performance and conduct for failure to adapt or will not adapt socially or emotionally to military life, with an uncharacterized discharge. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2009 | AR20090012516

    Original file (AR20090012516.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 3 March 2009, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, paragraph 14-12c, AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct for testing positive for marijuana (090103), with an uncharacterized discharge. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: No Change Other:...