Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | DRB | CY2010 | AR20100027552
Original file (AR20100027552.txt) Auto-classification: Denied
Applicant Name:  ?????

Application Receipt Date: 2010/11/09	Prior Review:     Prior Review Date: NA     

I.  Applicant Request:  Upgrade     Reason Change     RE Code Change    

Issues: The applicant states, in effect, that he would like to have his reenlistment code changed from a RE 4 to a minimum of RE 3 and that his discharge be changed to honorable.  The request was submitted on the grounds of equity due to the fact that his discharge was based on one isolated event and due to the conditions he was suffering from as related to his service in Operation Enduring Freedom.  

II.  Were Proper Discharge and Separation Authority procedures followed?	     
Tender Offer:   NA

See Attachments:  Legal     Medical     Minority Opinion     Exhibits 

III.  Discharge Under Review
Unit CDR Recommended Discharge: 	   Date: 050316
Discharge Received: 			   Date: 050405   Chapter: 14-12c (2)       AR: 635-200
Reason: Misconduct	   RE:     SPD: JKK   Unit/Location: Alpha Company, 1st Battalion, 75th Ranger Regiment, Hunter Army Airfield, GA 

Time Lost: None

Article 15s (Charges/Dates/Punishment): 041110, wrongfully used cocaine between (041015-041024) (FG)

Article 15 receipt date-NIF, disobeyed a lawful order, drunk and incapacitated for the proper performance of his duties, through prior wrongful indulgence in intoxicating liquor (051229) and tested positive for cocaine on (050207-050208) (CG), the aforementioned information was taken from the unit commander's recommendation for separation of the applicant.


Courts-Martial (Charges/Dates/Punishment): None

Counseling Records Available: Yes    No 

IV.  Soldier’s Overall Record
Age at current enlistment:  20
Current ENL Date: 030819    Current ENL Term: 3 Years  ?????
Current ENL Service: 	1 Yrs, 7 Mos, 17 Days ?????
Total Service:  		1 Yrs, 7 Mos, 17 Days ?????
Previous Discharges: 	None
Highest Grade: E-4		Performance Ratings Available: Yes    No 
MOS: 11B10 Infantryman   GT: 99   EDU: HS Grad   Overseas: Southwest Asia   Combat: Kuwait (040401-040704)
Decorations/Awards: NDSM, GWOTEM, GWOTSM, ASR

V.  Post-Discharge Activity
City, State:  ?????
Post Service Accomplishments: None submitted by the applicant.

VI.  Facts, Circumstances, and Legal Basis for Separation

       a.  Facts and Circumstances:
       The evidence of record shows that on 15 March 2005, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14-12c, AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct-commission of a serious offense; in that he wrongfully used cocaine, with a general, under honorable conditions discharge.  He was advised of his rights.  On 16 March 2005, the applicant consulted with legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, and did not submit a statement in his own behalf.  The unit commander subsequently recommended separation from the service and waiver of further rehabilitative efforts.  The separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. 
       
       The record contains a CID Report of Investigation in reference to the applicant's offense of wrongful use and possession of cocaine dated 3 November 2004.  

       b.  Legal Basis for Separation:  
       Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel.  Chapter 14 of this regulation establishes policy and prescribes procedures for separating members for misconduct.  Specific categories include minor disciplinary infractions, a pattern of misconduct, and commission of a serious offense, to include abuse of illegal drugs, convictions by civil authorities and desertion or absence without leave.  Action will be taken to separate a member for misconduct when it is clearly established that rehabilitation is impractical or unlikely to succeed.  Army policy states that an under other than honorable conditions discharge is normally considered appropriate; however, a general, under honorable conditions or an honorable discharge may be granted.   

       c.  Response to Issues, Recommendation and Rationale:  
       After carefully examining the applicant’s record of service during the period of enlistment under review, the issue and document submitted with the application, the analyst found no mitigating factors which would merit an upgrade of the applicant's discharge.   
       
       The analyst determined that the applicant’s discharge was appropriate because the quality of his service was not consistent with the Army's standards for acceptable personal conduct and performance of duty by military personnel.  The applicant, by violating the Army's policy not to possess or use illegal drugs, compromised the trust and confidence placed in a Soldier.  The applicant, as a Soldier, had the duty to support and abide by the Army's drug policies.  By abusing illegal drugs, the applicant knowingly risked a military career and diminished the quality of his service below that meriting a fully honorable discharge.  
       
       The analyst noted the applicant's issue that he would like to have his reenlistment code changed from a RE 4 to a minimum of RE 3.  At the time of discharge the applicant was appropriately assigned a reentry eligibility (RE) code of “4.”  An RE code of “4” cannot be waived and the applicant is no longer eligible for reenlistment.  
       
       The applicant further contends that his discharge was based on one isolated event and due to the conditions he was suffering from as related to his service in Operation Enduring Freedom.  Even though the applicant claims that his offense was an isolated one, the analyst concluded that the applicant committed many discrediting offenses, which constituted a departure from the standards of conduct, expected of Soldiers in the Army.  Having examined all the circumstances, the analyst determined that the applicant’s numerous incidents of misconduct did indeed adversely affect the quality of service, brought discredit on the Army, and was prejudicial to good order and discipline.  These incidents of misconduct clearly diminished the quality of the applicant’s service below that meriting a fully honorable discharge. 
       
       Additionally, the applicant contends that he was suffering from conditions that were related to his service in Operation Enduring Freedom which contributed to his misconduct.  The applicant does not state specifically what the conditions were and believes that they were the underlying cause of his misconduct, the record of evidence does not demonstrate that he sought relief from his condition through his command or the numerous Army community services like the Chaplain, Army Community and Family Support Services, Community Counseling Center, and other medical resources available to all Soldiers.  Likewise, he has provided no evidence that he should not be held responsible for his misconduct.  
       
       Therefore, the analyst determined that the reason for discharge and the characterization of service were both proper and equitable and recommends to the Board to deny relief. 

VII.  Summary of Army Discharge Review Board Hearing

Type of Hearing: 		Date: 24 October 2011         Location: Washington, DC

Did the Applicant Testify?  Yes     No  

Counsel: ?????

Witnesses/Observers: NA 

Exhibits Submitted: DD Form 293 dated 19 October 2010, Character Reference Letter dated 12 October 2010.

VIII.  Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation
After carefully examining the applicant’s record of service during the period of enlistment under review and considering the analyst’s recommendation and rationale, the Board determined that the discharge was both proper and equitable and voted to deny relief.  
        
IX.  Board Decision						
	XI.  Certification Signature
Board Vote:  							          Approval Authority:	
Character - Change 0    No change 5
Reason -     Change 0    No change 5
(Board member names available upon request)
								         EDGAR J. YANGER			 
								         Colonel, U.S. Army
X.  Board Action Directed					         President, Army Discharge Review Board
Issue a new DD Form 214  					
Change Characterization to: 			         
Change Reason to: No Change
Other: No Change										
RE Code: 
Grade Restoration:   No   Yes   Grade: No Change















Legend:
AWOL    	Absent Without Leave		GCM   General Court Martial	NA   Not applicable			SCM	Summary Court Martial
BCD   	Bad Conduct Discharge	GD      General Discharge	NIF   Not in the file			SPCM	Special Court Martial
CG 	Company Grade Article 15	HD      Honorable Discharge	OAD   Ordered to Active Duty		UNC	Uncharacterized Discharge  
DD 	Dishonorable Discharge	HS       High School Graduate	OMPF   Official Military Personnel File	UOTH  	Under Other Than Honorable 
FG	Field Grade Article 15		IADT   Initial Active Duty Training	RE     Reentry Code				Conditions 

ARMY DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD - CASE REPORT AND DIRECTIVE

Case Number AR20100027552
______________________________________________________________________________


Page 3 of 3 pages

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2009 | AR20090001846

    Original file (AR20090001846.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 27 July 2006, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. The applicable Army regulation states that there are circumstances in which the conduct or performance of duty reflected by an isolated incident provides the basis for a characterization. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2009 | AR20090006084

    Original file (AR20090006084.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 16 November 2006, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, Paragraph 14-12c(2), AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct-commission of a serious offense for testing positive for cocaine (060808), with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. The intermediate commander reviewed the proposed discharge action and recommended approval of the separation action...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2010 | AR20100014200

    Original file (AR20100014200.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 8 July 2009, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, paragraph 12c, AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct—commission of a serious offense for testing positive for cocaine and marijuana (090528), with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. The intermediate commander reviewed the proposed discharge action and recommended approval of the separation...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2009 | AR20090008408

    Original file (AR20090008408.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application Receipt Date: 2009/04/27 Prior Review: Prior Review Date: NA I. The applicant consulted with legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, requested consideration of his case by an administrative separation board, and did not submit a statement in his own behalf. The board recommended that the applicant be discharged with issuance of a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions.

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2008 | AR20080017505

    Original file (AR20080017505.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? The intermediate commander reviewed the proposed discharge action and recommended approval of the separation action with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation After carefully examining the applicant’s record of service during the period of enlistment under review and considering the analyst’s recommendation and rationale, the Board determined that the discharge was both proper and equitable and voted to...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120000085

    Original file (AR20120000085.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? On 23 September 2010, the separation authority waived further rehabilitation and directed the applicant’s discharge with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions . By abusing illegal drugs, the applicant knowingly risked a military career and diminished the quality of his service below that meriting a fully honorable discharge.

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2009 | AR20090012069

    Original file (AR20090012069.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Request: Upgrade Reason Change RE Code Change Issues: The applicant states: "Discharge was based on 1 isolated incident that occurred with almost 6 completed years of active honorable service. The applicant consulted with legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, waived consideration of her case by an administrative separation board, and did not submit a statement in her own behalf. Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation After carefully...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2008 | AR20080005089

    Original file (AR20080005089.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The DD Form 214 indicates that the applicant was discharged under the provisions of Chapter 14, AR 635-200, paragraph 12c by reason of misconduct (serious offense), with a characterization of service of under other than honorable conditions. c. Response to Issues, Recommendation and Rationale: After a careful review of all the applicant’s military records, and issues and documents submitted with the application, the analyst determined that the applicant’s available record of service during...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2009 | AR20090015319

    Original file (AR20090015319.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Chapter 10 of that regulation provides, in pertinent part, that a member who has committed an offense or offenses for which the authorized punishment includes a punitive discharge may submit a request for a discharge for the good of the service in lieu of trial by court-martial. Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation After carefully examining the applicant’s record of service during the period of enlistment under review and considering the analyst’s recommendation and...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110020463

    Original file (AR20110020463.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? On 17 June 2010, the applicant consulted with legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, and submitted a statement in his own behalf. The intermediate commander reviewed the proposed discharge action and recommended approval of the separation action with a general, under honorable conditions discharge.