Applicant Name:  ?????

Application Receipt Date: 2010/08/26	Prior Review:     Prior Review Date: NA     

I.  Applicant Request:  Upgrade     Reason Change     RE Code Change    

Issues: The applicant states, in effect, that he would like his discharge changed from general to honorable. Although this may not neccesarily be unjust or an error, it has been over 22 months since his discharge, and he feels this will help him greatly towards moving forward with his life and goals.  

II.  Were Proper Discharge and Separation Authority procedures followed?	     
Tender Offer:   NA

See Attachments:  Legal     Medical     Minority Opinion     Exhibits 

III.  Discharge Under Review
Unit CDR Recommended Discharge: 	   Date: 080911
Discharge Received: 			   Date: 081002   Chapter: 14-12c       AR: 635-200
Reason: Misconduct (Serious Offense)	   RE:     SPD: JKQ   Unit/Location: 557th Medical Company, 421st Multifunctional Medical Battalion, Germany, APO AE 

Time Lost: None

Article 15s (Charges/Dates/Punishment): 080507, operating a passenger car while drunk on or about (080117), reduction to Private (E-1), forfeiture of $670.00 pay per month for 2 months, extra duty and restriction for 45 days (FG)

Courts-Martial (Charges/Dates/Punishment): None

Counseling Records Available: Yes    No 

IV.  Soldier’s Overall Record
Age at current enlistment:  18
Current ENL Date: 060315    Current ENL Term: 4 Years  The applicant required a moral waiver at the time of enlistment, which was approved on (060221)
Current ENL Service: 	2 Yrs, 6 Mos, 18 Days ?????
Total Service:  		2 Yrs, 6 Mos, 18 Days ?????
Previous Discharges: 	None
Highest Grade: E-3		Performance Ratings Available: Yes    No 
MOS: 68W10 Health Care Spec   GT: 106   EDU: HS Grad   Overseas: Southwest Asia, Germany   Combat: Kuwait (060917-070915)
Decorations/Awards: AAM, NDSM, GWOTEM, GWOTSM, ASR, OSR

V.  Post-Discharge Activity
City, State:  ?????
Post Service Accomplishments: None submitted by the applicant.

VI.  Facts, Circumstances, and Legal Basis for Separation

       a.  Facts and Circumstances:
       The evidence of record shows that on 6 September 2008, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14-12c, AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct-commission of a serious offense; in that he was in physical control of a vehicle while drunk x 2 on or about (080117) and on or about (080301), wrongfully solicited another Soldier to impede a traffic accident investigation by switching seats with the appearance as if he was driving, and attempted to leave the scene of the accident.  The unit commander recommended separation with a general, under honorable conditions discharge.  He was advised of his rights.  On 10 September 2008, the applicant consulted with legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, and submitted a statement in his own behalf.  However, the statement is not part of the available record.  The unit commander subsequently recommended separation from the service and waiver of further rehabilitative efforts.  The intermediate commander reviewed the proposed discharge action and recommended approval of the separation action with a general, under honorable conditions discharge.  On 22 September 2008, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. 
       
       The record contains two General Officers Memorandum of Reprimands for driving under the influence of alcohol and fleeing the scene of an accident dated 29 May 2008, and for driving under the influence of alcohol dated 5 March 2008.  Also, the record contains two Military Police Reports in reference to the applicant's offenses of: driving while mentally impaired, driving on a revoked USAREUR drivers license, involved in a traffic accident; speeding too fast for road conditions and making a false official statement dated 1 March 2008, and for drunken driving, and a traffic accident; excessive speed for road conditions dated 17 January 2008.

       b.  Legal Basis for Separation:  
       Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel.  Chapter 14 of this regulation establishes policy and prescribes procedures for separating members for misconduct.  Specific categories include minor disciplinary infractions, a pattern of misconduct, and commission of a serious offense, to include abuse of illegal drugs, convictions by civil authorities and desertion or absence without leave.  Action will be taken to separate a member for misconduct when it is clearly established that rehabilitation is impractical or unlikely to succeed.  Army policy states that an under other than honorable conditions discharge is normally considered appropriate, however, a general, under honorable conditions or an honorable discharge may be granted.   

       c.  Response to Issues, Recommendation and Rationale:  
       After a careful review of all the applicant’s military records, and the issue submitted with the application, the analyst found no mitigating factors which would merit an upgrade of the applicant's discharge.  
       
       The analyst determined that the applicant’s discharge was appropriate because the quality of his service was not consistent with the Army's standards for acceptable personal conduct and performance of duty by military personnel.  By the misconduct, the applicant diminished the quality of his service below that meriting a fully honorable discharge.  
       
       The applicant provided no independent corroborating evidence demonstrating that either the command's action was erroneous or that the applicant’s service mitigated the misconduct or poor duty performance.  
       
       The analyst noted the applicant's issue that although his discharge may not neccesarily be unjust or an error, it has been over twenty two months since his discharge, and he feels this will help him greatly towards moving forward with his life and goals.  The analyst considered the applicant’s quality of service during the initial portion of the enlistment under review. 
       
       However, this service was determined not to be sufficiently meritorious to warrant an upgrade to the characterization of discharge.  Further, the Board does not grant relief solely for the purpose of gaining employment or enhancing employment opportunities.
       
       Therefore, the analyst determined that the reason for discharge and the characterization of service were both proper and equitable and recommends to the Board to deny relief. 
       
       
       
       
       
       
       
       

VII.  Summary of Army Discharge Review Board Hearing

Type of Hearing: 		Date: 4 May 2011         Location: Washington, DC

Did the Applicant Testify?  Yes     No  

Counsel: None

Witnesses/Observers: NA 

Exhibits Submitted: DD Form 293 dated 23 August 2010.

VIII.  Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation
After carefully examining the applicant’s record of service during the period of enlistment under review and considering the analyst’s recommendation and rationale, the Board determined that the discharge was both proper and equitable and voted to deny relief. 
        
IX.  Board Decision						
	XI.  Certification Signature
Board Vote:  							          Approval Authority:	
Character - Change 0    No change 5
Reason -     Change 0    No change 5
(Board member names available upon request)
								         EDGAR J. YANGER			 
								         Colonel, U.S. Army
X.  Board Action Directed					         President, Army Discharge Review Board
Issue a new DD Form 214  					
Change Characterization to: 			         
Change Reason to: No Change
Other: No Change										
RE Code: 
Grade Restoration:   No   Yes   Grade: No Change
















Legend:
AWOL    	Absent Without Leave		GCM   General Court Martial	NA   Not applicable			SCM	Summary Court Martial
BCD   	Bad Conduct Discharge	GD      General Discharge	NIF   Not in the file			SPCM	Special Court Martial
CG 	Company Grade Article 15	HD      Honorable Discharge	OAD   Ordered to Active Duty		UNC	Uncharacterized Discharge  
DD 	Dishonorable Discharge	HS       High School Graduate	OMPF   Official Military Personnel File	UOTH  	Under Other Than Honorable 
FG	Field Grade Article 15		IADT   Initial Active Duty Training	RE     Reentry Code				Conditions 

ARMY DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD - CASE REPORT AND DIRECTIVE

Case Number AR20100022413
______________________________________________________________________________


Page 1 of 3 pages