Applicant Name:  ?????

Application Receipt Date: 2010/08/26	Prior Review:     Prior Review Date: NA     

I.  Applicant Request:  Upgrade     Reason Change     RE Code Change    

Issues: The applicant states that he went to Iraq to serve and protect his country and although he left the Army in the wrong way, he hopes the Board can change his discharge and allow him to use his GI Bill and benefits.

II.  Were Proper Discharge and Separation Authority procedures followed?	     
Tender Offer:   NA

See Attachments:  Legal     Medical     Minority Opinion     Exhibits 

III.  Discharge Under Review
Unit CDR Recommended Discharge: 	   Date: 081008
Discharge Received: 			   Date: 081010   Chapter: 10       AR: 635-200
Reason: In Lieu of Trial by Court Martial	   RE:     SPD: KFS   Unit/Location: HSC, 19th Engr Bn, Fort Knox, KY 

Time Lost: AWOL x 2 for a total of 13 days; 9 days (080828-080904), mode of return unknown; 4 days (080906-080908), mode of return unknown.

Article 15s (Charges/Dates/Punishment): None in file.  The record shows the applicant was charged as a E-1/PVT.

Courts-Martial (Charges/Dates/Punishment): None

Counseling Records Available: Yes    No 

IV.  Soldier’s Overall Record
Age at current enlistment:  21
Current ENL Date: 071020    Current ENL Term: 4 Years  ?????
Current ENL Service: 	1 Yrs, 11Mos, 20Days ?????
Total Service:  		02 Yrs, 07Mos, 20Days ?????
Previous Discharges: 	RA 060124-071019/HD/Immediate reenlistment
Highest Grade: E-3		Performance Ratings Available: Yes    No 
MOS: 92A10/Automated Logistics Specialist   GT: 90   EDU: HS Grad   Overseas: Iraq   Combat: Iraq (060825-071111)
Decorations/Awards: ARCOM, NDSM, GWOTSM, ICM W/CS, ASR, OSR

V.  Post-Discharge Activity
City, State:  Louisville, KY
Post Service Accomplishments: None listed by the applicant.












VI.  Facts, Circumstances, and Legal Basis for Separation

       a.  Facts and Circumstances:
       The evidence of record shows that on 6 October 2008, the applicant was charged with AWOL x2 (080828-080905 and 080906-080909), on divers occasions between 16 August and on or about 22 August 2008, without authority, failed to go at the time prescribed to his appointed place of duty, on or about 3 October 2008, at or near Ft Knox, placed a weapon, to wit, a sharpened stick, on CPT T's computer keyboard which was prejudicial to good order and discipline, at or near Ft Knox, KY, on or about 3 October 2008 as a result of wrongful previous overindulgence in intoxicating liquor, incapacitated himself for the proper performance of his duties.   
       
       On 8 October 2008, the applicant consulted with legal counsel and voluntarily requested, in writing, discharge under the provisions of Chapter 10, AR 635-200 in lieu of trial by court-martial.  In this request, the applicant admitted guilt to the offense, or a lesser included offense.  Further, the applicant indicated he understood he could receive an under other than honorable conditions discharge and the discharge would have a significant effect on eligibility for veteran’s benefits.  The applicant did not submit a statement in his own behalf.  The applicant's chain of command recommended approval of the Chapter 10 request with an under other than honorable conditions discharge.  
       
       On 9 October 2008, the separation authority approved the Chapter 10 request and directed an under other than honorable conditions discharge.   

       b.  Legal Basis for Separation:  
       Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel.  Chapter 10 of that regulation provides, in pertinent part, that a member who has committed an offense or offenses for which the authorized punishment includes a punitive discharge may submit a request for a discharge for the good of the Service in lieu of trial by court-martial.  The request may be submitted at any time after charges have been preferred and must include the individual’s admission of guilt.  Army policy states that although an honorable or general, under honorable conditions discharge is authorized, a discharge under other than honorable conditions is normally considered appropriate.  

       c.  Response to Issues, Recommendation and Rationale:  
       After a careful review of all the applicant’s military records, and the issue and documents submitted with the application, the analyst found no mitigating factors which would merit an upgrade of the applicant's discharge.  
       
       The evidence of record indicates that the applicant was charged with the commission of an offense punishable under the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ) with a punitive discharge.  The applicant consulted with defense counsel, and voluntarily in writing, requested separation from the Army in lieu of trial by court-martial.  In doing so, the applicant admitted guilt to the stipulated or lesser-included offenses under the UCMJ.  
       
       The analyst noted that all the requirements of law and regulation were met and the rights of the applicant were fully protected throughout the separation process.  It is also noted that the characterization of service for this type of discharge is normally under other than honorable conditions and the applicant was aware of that prior to requesting discharge. 
       
       The analyst acknowledges the applicant’s in-service accomplishments, including his service in Iraq, and considered the quality of his service during the initial portion of the enlistment under review.  However, this service was determined not to be sufficiently mitigating to warrant an upgrade to the characterization of discharge as shown by the two AWOL periods and repeated incidents of misconduct.  
       
       Furthermore, eligibility for veteran's benefits to include educational benefits under the Montgomery GI Bill does not fall within the purview of the Army Discharge Review Board.  Accordingly, the applicant should contact a local office of the Department of Veterans Affairs for further assistance.
       
       Therefore, the analyst determined the reason for discharge and the characterization of service were both proper and equitable and recommends to the Board to deny relief.

VII.  Summary of Army Discharge Review Board Hearing

Type of Hearing: 		Date: 20 April 2011         Location: Atlanta, GA

Did the Applicant Testify?  Yes     No  

Counsel: NA

Witnesses/Observers: NA 

Exhibits Submitted: DD Form 293 dtd 23 August 2010; DD Form 214 dtd 10 October 2008; Dept of Army, Hqs, US Army Armor Center and Fort Knox, Fort Knox, KY, Orders 284-0212, dtd 10 October 2008; Dept of Army, Hqs, US Army Armor Center and Fort Knox, Fort Knox, KY, Orders 283-0175, dtd 09 October 2008; Enlisted Record Brief, dtd 09 October 2008

VIII.  Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation
After carefully examining the applicant’s record of service during the period of enlistment under review and considering the analyst’s recommendation and rationale, the Board determined that the discharge was both proper and equitable and voted to deny relief.       
        
IX.  Board Decision						
	XI.  Certification Signature
Board Vote:  							          Approval Authority:	
Character - Change 0    No change 5
Reason -     Change 0    No change 5
(Board member names available upon request)
								         EDGAR J. YANGER			 
								         Colonel, U.S. Army
X.  Board Action Directed					         President, Army Discharge Review Board
Issue a new DD Form 214  					
Change Characterization to: 			         
Change Reason to: No Change
Other: NA										
RE Code: 
Grade Restoration:   No   Yes   Grade: ?????






Legend:
AWOL    	Absent Without Leave		GCM   General Court Martial	NA   Not applicable			SCM	Summary Court Martial
BCD   	Bad Conduct Discharge	GD      General Discharge	NIF   Not in the file			SPCM	Special Court Martial
CG 	Company Grade Article 15	HD      Honorable Discharge	OAD   Ordered to Active Duty		UNC	Uncharacterized Discharge  
DD 	Dishonorable Discharge	HS       High School Graduate	OMPF   Official Military Personnel File	UOTH  	Under Other Than Honorable 
FG	Field Grade Article 15		IADT   Initial Active Duty Training	RE     Reentry Code				Conditions 

ARMY DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD - CASE REPORT AND DIRECTIVE

Case Number AR20100022356
______________________________________________________________________________


Page 3 of 3 pages