Applicant Name: ?????
Application Receipt Date: 2010/08/20 Prior Review: Prior Review Date: NA
I. Applicant Request: Upgrade Reason Change RE Code Change
Issues: The applicant states, in effect, that he is trying to better his life by going to college, and getting a good career so that he can support his family. He would like to have an honorable discharge so that he can get the Montgomery GI Bill. This would help him greatly in getting a good career.
II. Were Proper Discharge and Separation Authority procedures followed?
Tender Offer: NA
See Attachments: Legal Medical Minority Opinion Exhibits
III. Discharge Under Review
Unit CDR Recommended Discharge: Date: 091116
Discharge Received: Date: 091214 Chapter: 14-12c AR: 635-200
Reason: Misconduct (Serious Offense) RE: SPD: JKQ Unit/Location: C Troop, 1st Squadron, 16th Cavalry Regiment, Fort Knox, KY
Time Lost: None
Article 15s (Charges/Dates/Punishment): 090720, willfully altered his military identification car by changing his year of birth, the property of the United States (090703), wrongfully possessed marijuana (090711), and assaulted a female (090711), reduction to Private (E-1), forfeiture of $699.00 pay per month for two months, suspended, to be automatically remitted if not vacated before (100115), extra duty and restriction for 45 days (FG)
The suspension of the punishment of forfeiture of $699.00 pay per month for two months imposed on (090720) was vacated, effective (090403) based on the applicant's offense of failing to go to his appointed place of duty (090801)
Courts-Martial (Charges/Dates/Punishment): None
Counseling Records Available: Yes No
IV. Soldiers Overall Record
Age at current enlistment: 17
Current ENL Date: 070628 Current ENL Term: 3 Years 18 weeks/The applicant required a medical waiver at the time of enlistment, which was approved on (061113).
Current ENL Service: 2 Yrs, 5 Mos, 17 Days ?????
Total Service: 2 Yrs, 5 Mos, 17 Days ?????
Previous Discharges: None
Highest Grade: E-4 Performance Ratings Available: Yes No
MOS: 19D10 Cavalry Scout GT: 99 EDU: HS Grad Overseas: Korea (071112-081219) Combat: None
Decorations/Awards: AAM, NDSM, GWOTSM, KDSM, ASR, OSR
V. Post-Discharge Activity
City, State: ?????
Post Service Accomplishments: None submitted by the applicant.
VI. Facts, Circumstances, and Legal Basis for Separation
a. Facts and Circumstances:
The evidence of record shows that on 16 November 2009, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14-12c, AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct-commission of a serious offense; in that he received a Field Grade Article 15 on (090720) for wrongful possession of marijuana, with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. He was advised of his rights. On 20 November 2009, the applicant consulted with legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, and did not submit a statement in his own behalf. The unit commander subsequently recommended separation from the service and waiver of further rehabilitative efforts. The intermediate commander reviewed the proposed discharge action and recommended approval of the separation action with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. On 24 November 2009, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions.
The record contains a Military Police Report in reference to the applicnat's offenses of simple assault, possession of marijuana, spousal abuse dated 11 July 2009.
b. Legal Basis for Separation:
Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel. Chapter 14 of this regulation establishes policy and prescribes procedures for separating members for misconduct. Specific categories include minor disciplinary infractions, a pattern of misconduct, and commission of a serious offense, to include abuse of illegal drugs, convictions by civil authorities and desertion or absence without leave. Action will be taken to separate a member for misconduct when it is clearly established that rehabilitation is impractical or unlikely to succeed. Army policy states that an under other than honorable conditions discharge is normally considered appropriate, however, a general, under honorable conditions or an honorable discharge may be granted.
c. Response to Issues, Recommendation and Rationale:
After a careful review of all the applicants military records, and the issue submitted with the application, the analyst found no mitigating factors which would merit an upgrade of the applicant's discharge.
The analyst determined that the applicants discharge was appropriate because the quality of his service was not consistent with the Army's standards for acceptable personal conduct and performance of duty by military personnel. By the misconduct, the applicant diminished the quality of his service below that meriting a fully honorable discharge.
The applicant provided no independent corroborating evidence demonstrating that either the command's action was erroneous or that the applicants service mitigated the misconduct or poor duty performance.
The analyst noted the applicant's issue that he is trying to better his life by going to college, and getting a good career so that he can support his family. Eligibility for veteran's benefits to include educational benefits under the Post-9/11 or Montgomery GI Bill does not fall within the purview of the Army Discharge Review Board. Accordingly, the applicant should contact a local office of the Department of Veterans Affairs for further assistance. Further, the Board does not grant relief solely for the purpose of gaining employment or enhancing employment opportunities.
Therefore, the analyst determined that the reason for discharge and the characterization of service were both proper and equitable and recommends to the Board to deny relief.
VII. Summary of Army Discharge Review Board Hearing
Type of Hearing: Date: 29 April 2011 Location: Washington, DC
Did the Applicant Testify? Yes No
Counsel: None
Witnesses/Observers: None
Exhibits Submitted: DD FORM 293 dated 13 August 2010.
VIII. Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation
After carefully examining the applicants record of service during the period of enlistment under review and considering the analysts recommendation and rationale, the Board determined that the discharge was both proper and equitable and voted to deny relief.
IX. Board Decision
XI. Certification Signature
Board Vote: Approval Authority:
Character - Change 0 No change 5
Reason - Change 0 No change 5
(Board member names available upon request)
EDGAR J. YANGER
Colonel, U.S. Army
X. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board
Issue a new DD Form 214
Change Characterization to:
Change Reason to: No Change
Other: No Change
RE Code:
Grade Restoration: No Yes Grade: No Change
Legend:
AWOL Absent Without Leave GCM General Court Martial NA Not applicable SCM Summary Court Martial
BCD Bad Conduct Discharge GD General Discharge NIF Not in the file SPCM Special Court Martial
CG Company Grade Article 15 HD Honorable Discharge OAD Ordered to Active Duty UNC Uncharacterized Discharge
DD Dishonorable Discharge HS High School Graduate OMPF Official Military Personnel File UOTH Under Other Than Honorable
FG Field Grade Article 15 IADT Initial Active Duty Training RE Reentry Code Conditions
ARMY DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD - CASE REPORT AND DIRECTIVE
Case Number AR20100021906
______________________________________________________________________________
Page 1 of 3 pages
ARMY | DRB | CY2010 | AR20100025612
Applicant Name: ????? c. Response to Issues, Recommendation and Rationale: After a careful review of all the applicants military records, and the issue submitted with the application, the analyst found no mitigating factors which would merit an upgrade of the applicant's discharge. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: No Change Other: No Change RE Code: Grade Restoration: No Yes Grade: No...
ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110015232
Applicant Name: ????? On 29 September 2009, the applicant consulted with legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action and indicated on his election of rights form that he would be submitting a statement. On 10 November 2009, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions.
ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110004072
Applicant Name: ????? On 30 November 2009, the intermediate commander reviewed the proposed discharge action and recommended approval of the separation action with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation After carefully examining the applicants record of service during the period of enlistment under review and considering the analysts recommendation and rationale, the Board determined that the discharge was both proper and...
ARMY | DRB | CY2010 | AR20100012674
Applicant Name: ????? Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 3 September 2009, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, paragraph 14-12c(2), AR 635-200, by reason of misconductcommission of a serious offense for wrongfully appropriation of a POV (090124), and testing positive for marijuana (090429), with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. The narrative reason specified by Army...
ARMY | DRB | CY2010 | AR20100008164
Applicant Name: ????? On 6 February 2009, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: No Change Other: No Change RE Code: Grade Restoration: No Yes Grade: No Change Legend: AWOL Absent Without Leave GCM General Court...
ARMY | DRB | CY2010 | AR20100028004
Applicant Name: ????? On 13 July 2009, the intermediate commander reviewed the proposed discharge action and recommended approval of the separation action with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. On 15 July 2009, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions.
ARMY | DRB | CY2010 | AR20100014317
The separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. The applicable Army regulation states that there are circumstances in which the conduct or performance of duty reflected by a single incident provides the basis for a characterization. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change...
ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110005158
Applicant Name: ????? Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 16 February 2010, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14-12c (2), AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct-abuse of illegal drugs; in that he abused illegal drugs and received multiple charges for drinking while under the legal age of 21, with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. On 5 April 2010, the separation authority waived...
ARMY | DRB | CY2010 | AR20100021103
Applicant Name: ????? Total Service: 3 Yrs, 3 Mos, 6 Days ????? On 8 April 2009, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed the applicants discharge with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions.
ARMY | DRB | CY2009 | AR20090014156
Applicant Name: ????? On 18 February 2009, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation After carefully examining the applicants record of service during the period of enlistment under review and considering the analysts recommendation and rationale, the Board determined that the discharge was both...