Applicant Name: ?????
Application Receipt Date: 2010/07/26 Prior Review: Prior Review Date: NA
I. Applicant Request: Upgrade Reason Change RE Code Change
Issues: The applicant states in effect that he is requesting that his status be upgraded from general under honorable conditions to honorable for the following reasons. He is completely aware that he has committed a serious offense; by wrongfully using marijuana while under military payroll and for that he has only himself to blame. He had recently arrived from Afghanistan, and no matter how much training a person receives, no one is truly prepared for the atrocities he bore witness too.
After returning from the war, he was unable to acclimate to what used to be home. The agony of not having anyone around that he could relate to was unbearable. As a result he was unable to avoid the peer pressure bestowed upon him by family and friends. He is no way excusing himself from his erroneous actions, he just ask for leniency and understanding while reviewing his case. He has embarrassed himself and the US Army, and for that he humbly apologizes.
II. Were Proper Discharge and Separation Authority procedures followed?
Tender Offer: NA
See Attachments: Legal Medical Minority Opinion Exhibits
III. Discharge Under Review
Unit CDR Recommended Discharge: Date: 091130
Discharge Received: Date: 091222 Chapter: 14-12c AR: 635-200
Reason: Misconduct (Serious Offense) RE: SPD: JKQ Unit/Location: A Company, 725th Brigade Support Battalion, 4th Brigade (Airborne), 25th Infantry Division, Forward Operating Base Sharana, Afghanistan
Time Lost: None
Article 15s (Charges/Dates/Punishment): 091204, wrongfully used marijuana between on or about (090801-090831), reduction to Private (E-1), forfeiture of $699.00 pay per month for two months, extra duty for 45 days (FG)
Courts-Martial (Charges/Dates/Punishment): None
Counseling Records Available: Yes No
IV. Soldiers Overall Record
Age at current enlistment: 20
Current ENL Date: 080305 Current ENL Term: 3 Years 26 weeks; the applicant extended his enlistment for 2 months, giving him a new ETS date of : (2011/11/02)/The applicant also required a moral waiver at the time of enlistment, which was approved on (080221).
Current ENL Service: 1 Yrs, 9 Mos, 18 Days ?????
Total Service: 1 Yrs, 9 Mos, 18 Days ?????
Previous Discharges: None
Highest Grade: E-3 Performance Ratings Available: Yes No
MOS: 92F10 Petroleum Supply Spec GT: 93 EDU: HS Grad Overseas: Southwest Asia Combat: Afghanistan (090305-091209)
Decorations/Awards: NDSM, GWOTSM, NATOM, ACMw/CS, ASR, OSR
V. Post-Discharge Activity
City, State: ?????
Post Service Accomplishments: None submitted by the applicant.
VI. Facts, Circumstances, and Legal Basis for Separation
a. Facts and Circumstances:
The evidence of record shows that on 30 November 2009, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14-12c, AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct-commission of a serious offense; in that he wrongfully used marijuana, with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. He was advised of his rights. On 30 November 2009, the applicant consulted with legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, and did not submit a statement in his own behalf.
The unit commander subsequently recommended separation from the service and waiver of further rehabilitative efforts. The intermediate commander reviewed the proposed discharge action and recommended approval of the separation action with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. On 5 December 2009, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions.
b. Legal Basis for Separation:
Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel. Chapter 14 of this regulation establishes policy and prescribes procedures for separating members for misconduct. Specific categories include minor disciplinary infractions, a pattern of misconduct, and commission of a serious offense, to include abuse of illegal drugs, convictions by civil authorities and desertion or absence without leave. Action will be taken to separate a member for misconduct when it is clearly established that rehabilitation is impractical or unlikely to succeed. Army policy states that an under other than honorable conditions discharge is normally considered appropriate, however, a general, under honorable conditions or an honorable discharge may be granted.
c. Response to Issues, Recommendation and Rationale:
After a careful review of all the applicants military records, and the issue submitted with the application, the analyst found no mitigating factors which would merit an upgrade of the applicant's discharge.
The analyst determined that the applicants discharge was appropriate because the quality of his service was not consistent with the Army's standards for acceptable personal conduct and performance of duty by military personnel. By the misconduct, the applicant diminished the quality of his service below that meriting a fully honorable discharge.
The applicant provided no independent corroborating evidence demonstrating that either the command's action was erroneous or that the applicants service mitigated the misconduct or poor duty performance.
The analyst noted the applicant's issue that after returning from the war, he was unable to acclimate to what used to be home. The agony of not having anyone around that he could relate to was unbearable, and as a result he was unable to avoid the peer pressure bestowed upon him by family and friends. Specifically, the applicant claims the peer pressure from his family and friends resulted in his discharge. While the applicant may believe the peer pressure from his family and friends was the underlying cause of his misconduct, the record of evidence does not demonstrate that he sought relief from the issues of peer pressure through his command or the numerous Army community services like the Chaplain, Army Community and Family Support Services, Community Counseling Center, and other medical resources available to all Soldiers. Likewise, he has provided no evidence that he should not be held responsible for his misconduct.
Therefore, the analyst determined that the reason for discharge and the characterization of service were both proper and equitable and recommends to the Board to deny relief.
VII. Summary of Army Discharge Review Board Hearing
Type of Hearing: Date: 8 April 2011 Location: Washington, DC
Did the Applicant Testify? Yes No
Counsel: None
Witnesses/Observers: NA
Exhibits Submitted: DD Form 293 dated 14 June 2010.
VIII. Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation
After carefully examining the applicants record of service during the period of enlistment under review and considering the analysts recommendation and rationale, the Board determined that the discharge was both proper and equitable and voted to deny relief.
IX. Board Decision
XI. Certification Signature
Board Vote: Approval Authority:
Character - Change 0 No change 5
Reason - Change 0 No change 5
(Board member names available upon request)
EDGAR J. YANGER
Colonel, U.S. Army
X. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board
Issue a new DD Form 214
Change Characterization to:
Change Reason to: No Change
Other: No Change
RE Code:
Grade Restoration: No Yes Grade: No Change
Legend:
AWOL Absent Without Leave GCM General Court Martial NA Not applicable SCM Summary Court Martial
BCD Bad Conduct Discharge GD General Discharge NIF Not in the file SPCM Special Court Martial
CG Company Grade Article 15 HD Honorable Discharge OAD Ordered to Active Duty UNC Uncharacterized Discharge
DD Dishonorable Discharge HS High School Graduate OMPF Official Military Personnel File UOTH Under Other Than Honorable
FG Field Grade Article 15 IADT Initial Active Duty Training RE Reentry Code Conditions
ARMY DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD - CASE REPORT AND DIRECTIVE
Case Number AR20100019726
______________________________________________________________________________
Page 1 of 3 pages
ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120006081
Applicant Name: ????? Applicant Request: Upgrade Reason Change RE Code Change Issues: The applicant states, in effect, that he made bad choices that led to his discharge. On 26 April 2002, the Deputy Assistant Secretary (Army Review Boards) approved the recommendation of the Army Ad Hoc Review Board and directed that the applicants discharge with a characterization of service of under other than honorable conditions.
ARMY | DRB | CY2008 | AR20080011239
Applicant Name: ????? Despite the mistake that I have made I truly believe that I can make a contribution as a soldier in the United States Army. Upon return I was met with immediate pressure from friends and family to not return to complete my training.
ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110019343
Applicant Name: ????? Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 5 October 2005, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, paragraph 14-12c, AR 635-200, by reason of misconductfor wrongfully using marijuana (050701 and 050805); recklessly operating a vehicle while under the influence of marijuana (050701 and 050905); and making a false statement initially denying use of marijuana (050813), with a...
ARMY | DRB | CY2009 | AR20090005387
Applicant Name: ????? The intermediate commander reviewed the proposed discharge action and recommended approval of the separation action with an under other than honorable conditions discharge. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: No Change Other: NA RE Code: Grade Restoration: No Yes Grade: None ARMY DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD - CASE REPORT AND DIRECTIVE Case Number...
ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110016125
Applicant Name: ????? The DD Form 214 indicates the applicant was discharged under the provisions of Chapter 14, AR 635-200, paragraph 14-12c by reason of misconduct commission of a serious offense, with a characterization of service of under other than honorable conditions. Certification Signature Approval Authority: EDGAR J. YANGER Colonel, U.S. Army President, Army Discharge Review Board BONITA E. TROTMAN Lieutenant Colonel, U. S. Army Secretary Recorder ?????
ARMY | DRB | CY2008 | AR20080008123
Applicant Name: ????? On 27 January 2008, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of general under honorable conditions. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: NA Other: NA RE Code: Grade Restoration: No Yes Grade: NA ARMY DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD - CASE REPORT AND DIRECTIVE Case Number...
ARMY | DRB | CY2010 | AR20100017062
Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 5 June 2006, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14-12c, AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct-commission of a serious offense; in that he wrongfully used marijuana on two separate occasions, with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. The intermediate commander reviewed the proposed discharge action and recommended approval of the separation action...
ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070010427
Applicant Name: ????? The separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. By abusing illegal drugs, the applicant knowingly risked a military career and diminished the quality of his service below that meriting a fully honorable discharge.
ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070013920
Applicant Name: ????? Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 10 May 2007, the unit commander notified the Applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, AR 635-200, by reason of misconductcommission of a serious offense having received a Field Grade Article 15 for disobeying an NCO, assaulting an NCO, wrongfully inhaling canned air to induce euphoria and, disobeying an NCO not to drink alcohol while redeploying from Afghanistan, with...
ARMY | DRB | CY2010 | AR20100027338
Applicant Name: ????? Therefore, the analyst determined that the reason for discharge and the characterization of service were both proper and equitable and recommends to the Board to deny relief. The Board found that the overall length and quality of the applicants service, to include his combat service (i.e., two tours in Afghanistan and Iraq), mitigated the discrediting entry in his service record.