Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | DRB | CY2010 | AR20100019570
Original file (AR20100019570.txt) Auto-classification: Denied
Applicant Name:  ?????

Application Receipt Date: 2010/07/20	Prior Review:     Prior Review Date: NA     

I.  Applicant Request:  Upgrade     Reason Change     RE Code Change    

Issues: The applicant states, in effect, that he has a previous Good Conduct Award from the US Navy, an Honorable Discharge from the US Navy and would like to have his discharge upgraded to have the future option of rejoining the military. He has seven years of military experience, and a very hard worker. 

II.  Were Proper Discharge and Separation Authority procedures followed?	     
Tender Offer:   NA

See Attachments:  Legal     Medical     Minority Opinion     Exhibits 

III.  Discharge Under Review
Unit CDR Recommended Discharge: 	   Date: 091122
Discharge Received: 			   Date: 100112   Chapter: 14-12c       AR: 635-200
Reason: Misconduct (Serious Offense)	   RE:     SPD: JKQ   Unit/Location: Home Detachment, 1st Battalion, 30th Infantry Regiment, 2nd Brigade Combat Team, 3rd Infantry Division (Rear) (Provisional), Fort Stewart, GA 

Time Lost: None

Article 15s (Charges/Dates/Punishment): 090909, wrongfully used marijuana between on or about (090608-090707), and wrongfully used cocaine between on or about (090705-090707), reduction to Private (E-2), 

The suspension of the punishment of forfeiture of $784.00 pay per month for 2 months imposed on (090909) was vacated, effective (091020) based on the applicnat's offense of wrongfully using marijuana between on or about (090810-090909).

Courts-Martial (Charges/Dates/Punishment): None

Counseling Records Available: Yes    No 

IV.  Soldier’s Overall Record
Age at current enlistment:  26
Current ENL Date: 070717    Current ENL Term: 4 Years  ?????
Current ENL Service: 	2 Yrs, 5 Mos, 6 Days ?????
Total Service:  		7 Yrs, 7 Mos, 21 Days ?????
Previous Discharges: 	USN    020522-060421/HD
                                       USNR 060422-070716/NA
Highest Grade: E-4		Performance Ratings Available: Yes    No 
MOS: 91B10 Wheeled Veh Mech   GT: 117   EDU: HS Grad   Overseas: None   Combat: None
Decorations/Awards: GCMDL, NGCMDL, NDSM, GWOTSM, SSMDL, ASR, USN "E" Ribbon

V.  Post-Discharge Activity
City, State:  ?????
Post Service Accomplishments: None submitted by the applicant.  

VI.  Facts, Circumstances, and Legal Basis for Separation

       a.  Facts and Circumstances:
       The evidence of record shows that on 22 November 2009, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14-12c, AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct-commission of a serious offense-abuse of illegal drugs; in that he wrongfully used marijuana between (090608-090707) and wrongfully used cocaine between (090705-090707) for which he received a Field Grade Article 15 for the above offenses, with an under other than honorable conditions discharge.  He was advised of his rights.  0n 23 November 2009, the applicant consulted with legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, voluntarily waived consideration of his case by an administrative separation board contingent upon him receiving a characterization of service no less favorable than a general, under honorable conditons discharge and did not submit a statement in his own behalf. 
       
       The unit commander subsequently recommended separation from the service and waiver of further rehabilitative efforts.  The intermediate commander reviewed the proposed discharge action and recommended approval of the separation action with a general, under honorable conditions discharge.  On 28 December 2009, the separation authority approved the conditional waiver of the administrative separation board; waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. 

       b.  Legal Basis for Separation:  
       Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel.  Chapter 14 of this regulation establishes policy and prescribes procedures for separating members for misconduct.  Specific categories include minor disciplinary infractions, a pattern of misconduct, and commission of a serious offense, to include abuse of illegal drugs, convictions by civil authorities and desertion or absence without leave.  Action will be taken to separate a member for misconduct when it is clearly established that rehabilitation is impractical or unlikely to succeed.  Army policy states that an under other than honorable conditions discharge is normally considered appropriate, however, a general, under honorable conditions or an honorable discharge may be granted. 

       c.  Response to Issues, Recommendation and Rationale:  
       After carefully examining the applicant’s record of service during the period of enlistment under review and the issue submitted with the application, the analyst found no mitigating factors which would merit an upgrade of the applicant's discharge.   
       
       The analyst determined that the applicant’s discharge was appropriate because the quality of his service was not consistent with the Army's standards for acceptable personal conduct and performance of duty by military personnel.  The applicant, by violating the Army's policy not to possess or use illegal drugs, compromised the trust and confidence placed in a Soldier.  The applicant, as a Soldier, had the duty to support and abide by the Army's drug policies.  By abusing illegal drugs, the applicant knowingly risked a military career and diminished the quality of his service below that meriting a fully honorable discharge.  
       
       The analyst noted the applicant's issue that he has a previous Good Conduct Award from the US Navy, an Honorable Discharge from the US Navy and would like to have his discharge upgraded to have the future option of rejoining the military.  The analyst carefully examined the applicant's record of service during the period of enlistment under review.  There was a full consideration of all faithful and honorable service as well as the infractions of discipline, the extent thereof, and the seriousness of the offenses.  The analyst concluded that the discrediting entries in the applicant's record were not outweighed by prior or subsequent service of sufficient merit to warrant an upgrade of the discharge being reviewed. 
       
       Further, if the applicant desires to reenlist, he should contact the local recruiter to determine his eligibility to reenlist.  Those individuals can best advise a former service member as to the needs of the Army at the time, and are required to process waivers of reentry eligibility (RE) codes. 
       
       Therefore, the analyst determined thaat the reason for discharge and the characterization of service were both proper and equitable and recommends to the Board to deny relief. 
       
       
       
       
       
       

VII.  Summary of Army Discharge Review Board Hearing

Type of Hearing: 		Date: 1 April 2011         Location: Washington, DC

Did the Applicant Testify?  Yes     No  

Counsel: None

Witnesses/Observers: NA 

Exhibits Submitted: DD Form 293 dated 12 July 2010, Copy of his DD Form 214 from the Navy, for the period of service ending 21 April 2006.  

VIII.  Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation
After carefully examining the applicant’s record of service during the period of enlistment under review and considering the analyst’s recommendation and rationale, the Board determined that the discharge was both proper and equitable and voted to deny relief. 
        
IX.  Board Decision						
	XI.  Certification Signature
Board Vote:  							          Approval Authority:	
Character - Change 0    No change 5
Reason -     Change 0    No change 5
(Board member names available upon request)
								         EDGAR J. YANGER			 
								         Colonel, U.S. Army
X.  Board Action Directed					         President, Army Discharge Review Board
Issue a new DD Form 214  					
Change Characterization to: 			         
Change Reason to: No Change
Other: No Change										
RE Code: 
Grade Restoration:   No   Yes   Grade: No Change















Legend:
AWOL    	Absent Without Leave		GCM   General Court Martial	NA   Not applicable			SCM	Summary Court Martial
BCD   	Bad Conduct Discharge	GD      General Discharge	NIF   Not in the file			SPCM	Special Court Martial
CG 	Company Grade Article 15	HD      Honorable Discharge	OAD   Ordered to Active Duty		UNC	Uncharacterized Discharge  
DD 	Dishonorable Discharge	HS       High School Graduate	OMPF   Official Military Personnel File	UOTH  	Under Other Than Honorable 
FG	Field Grade Article 15		IADT   Initial Active Duty Training	RE     Reentry Code				Conditions 

ARMY DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD - CASE REPORT AND DIRECTIVE

Case Number AR20100019570
______________________________________________________________________________


Page 1 of 3 pages

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2010 | AR20100008818

    Original file (AR20100008818.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The intermediate commander reviewed the proposed discharge action and recommended approval of the separation action with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. The applicant, as a Soldier, had the duty to support and abide by the Army's drug policies. The applicable Army regulation states that there are circumstances in which the conduct or performance of duty reflected by a single incident provides the basis for a characterization.

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120003822

    Original file (AR20120003822.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, paragraph 14-12c, AR 635-200, by reason of commission of a serious offense-abuse of illegal drugs for wrongfully using marijuana (090608-090707),for which he received an Article 15, with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. The narrative reason specified by Army Regulations for a...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2010 | AR20100016105

    Original file (AR20100016105.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? c. Response to Issues, Recommendation and Rationale: After a careful review of all the applicant’s military records, and the issue submitted with the application, the analyst found no mitigating factors which would merit an upgrade of the applicant's discharge. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: No Change Other: No Change RE Code: Grade Restoration: No Yes Grade: No...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2010 | AR20100008542

    Original file (AR20100008542.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? Accordingly, the analyst recommends to the board that the applicant’s characterization of service be upgraded to fully honorable. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: No Change Other: No Change RE Code: Grade Restoration: No Yes Grade: No Change Legend: AWOL Absent Without Leave GCM General Court Martial NA Not applicable SCM Summary Court Martial BCD Bad Conduct Discharge GD...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2010 | AR20100012819

    Original file (AR20100012819.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 18 December 2009, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, paragraph 14-12c, AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct—commission of a serious offense, for abuse of illegal drugs, AWOL, and multiple failures to report to his designated place of duty, with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. The separation authority waived further...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110020399

    Original file (AR20110020399.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? Except for the foregoing modifications to the applicant's Separation Authority, Separation (SPD) Code, Reentry Eligibility (RE) Code, and the Narrative Reason For Separation, the Board determined that the discharge was both proper and equitable and voted to deny relief. Certification Signature Approval Authority: EDGAR J. YANGER Colonel, U.S. Army President, Army Discharge Review Board BONITA E. TROTMAN Lieutenant Colonel, U. S. Army Secretary Recorder Legend: AWOL...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120013067

    Original file (AR20120013067.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 14 August 2009, the applicant consulted with legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, unconditionally waived his right to an administrative separation board, and did not submit a statement in his own behalf. The intermediate commander reviewed the proposed action and recommended approval of the separation with an under other than honorable conditions discharge. Legal Basis for Separation: Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the separation...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2009 | AR20090000363

    Original file (AR20090000363.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 3 November 2008, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of general under honorable conditions. The applicable Army regulation states that there are circumstances in which the conduct or performance of duty reflected by a single incident provides the basis for a characterization. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2010 | AR20100007156

    Original file (AR20100007156.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? The applicant consulted with legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, voluntarily waived consideration of his case by an administrative separation board and submitted a statement in his own behalf. On 21 December 2000, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of under other than honorable conditions.

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120001780

    Original file (AR20120001780.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 16 February 2010, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, paragraph 14-12c, AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct—commission of a serious offense for wrongfully using illegal drugs, he tested positive for cocaine and marijuana at a unit urinalysis (090911) for which he received a field grade Article 15, with a general, under honorable...