Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | DRB | CY2010 | AR20100018973
Original file (AR20100018973.txt) Auto-classification: Denied
Applicant Name:  ?????

Application Receipt Date: 2010/08/03	Prior Review:     Prior Review Date: NA     

I.  Applicant Request:  Upgrade     Reason Change     RE Code Change    

Issues: The applicant states, "I made some Mistakes while I was in the service and now regret them.  Now I'm trying to better myself for my family.  I'm trying to obtain a degree so that I can provide for them.  In todays economic down turn it is hard to obtain work that either has the hours needed or the pay needed to survive.  I decided to go back to school but with the rising costs of tuition and housing I really need the Post 9-/11 bill to be able to go to school and to provide for my family."

II.  Were Proper Discharge and Separation Authority procedures followed?	     
Tender Offer:   NA

See Attachments:  Legal     Medical     Minority Opinion     Exhibits 

III.  Discharge Under Review
Unit CDR Recommended Discharge: 	NIF   Date: NIF
Discharge Received: 			   Date: 080814   Chapter: 14-12b       AR: 635-200
Reason: Pattern of Misconduct	   RE:     SPD: JKA   Unit/Location: 529th INVO Spt, Fort Myer, VA 

Time Lost: None

Article 15s (Charges/Dates/Punishment): NIF

Courts-Martial (Charges/Dates/Punishment): NIF

Counseling Records Available: Yes    No 

IV.  Soldier’s Overall Record
Age at current enlistment:  24
Current ENL Date: 051123    Current ENL Term: 03 Years  20 Weeks
Current ENL Service: 	02  Yrs, 08 Mos, 22 Days ?????
Total Service:  		02  Yrs, 08 Mos, 22 Days ?????
Previous Discharges: 	None
Highest Grade: NIF		Performance Ratings Available: Yes    No 
MOS: 88M10 Motor Transport Operator   GT: NIF   EDU: 11 Years   Overseas: None   Combat: None
Decorations/Awards: NDSM, GWOTSM, ASR

V.  Post-Discharge Activity
City, State:  La Habra, CA 
Post Service Accomplishments: None Listed

VI.  Facts, Circumstances, and Legal Basis for Separation

       a.  Facts and Circumstances:
       The applicant’s record is void of the specific facts and circumstances concerning the events which led to the discharge from the Army.  However, the record does contain a properly constituted DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty), which was authenticated by the applicant’s signature.  The DD Form 214 indicates the applicant was discharged under the provisions of Chapter 14, paragraph 14-12b, AR 635-200, by reason of pattern of misconduct, with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions.  
       
       Furthermore, the DD Form 214 shows a Separation Code of JKA (i.e., pattern of misconduct), with a reentry eligibility (RE) code of "3."    On 5 August 2008, DA, HQS, Fort Myer Military Community, Arlington, VA, Orders 218-0003, discharged the applicant from the Regular Army, effective date:  14 August 2008.
       b.  Legal Basis for Separation:  
       Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel.  Chapter 14 of this regulation establishes policy and prescribes procedures for separating members for misconduct.  Specific categories include minor disciplinary infractions, a pattern of misconduct, and commission of a serious offense, to include abuse of illegal drugs, convictions by civil authorities and desertion or absence without leave.  Action will be taken to separate a member for misconduct when it is clearly established that rehabilitation is impractical or unlikely to succeed.  Army policy states that an under other than honorable conditions discharge is normally considered appropriate, however, a general, under honorable conditions or an honorable discharge may be granted. 

       c.  Response to Issues, Recommendation and Rationale:  
       After a careful review of all the applicant’s available military records during the period of enlistment under review, the issues and documents submitted with the application, the analyst found no mitigating factors that would merit an upgrade of the applicant's discharge.  
       
       The applicant’s record is void of the specific facts and circumstances concerning the events that led to the applicant's discharge from the Army.  However, the applicant’s record does contain a properly constituted DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty), which was authenticated by the applicant's signature.  This document identifies the reason and characterization of the discharge and the analyst presumed government regularity in the discharge process.  
       
       The DD Form 214 indicates the applicant was discharged under the provisions of Chapter 14, AR 635-200, paragraph 14-12c by reason of misconduct, with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions.  Barring evidence to the contrary, the analyst was satisfied that all requirements of law and regulation were met and the rights of the applicant were fully protected throughout the separation process.  
       
             The applicant contends that in today's economic down turn it is hard to obtain work that either has the hours needed or the pay needed to survive.  The analyst acknowledges the applicant's contention; however, the Board does not grant relief solely for the purpose of gaining employment or enhancing employment opportunities.
             
             The applicant further contends he really needs the Post 9/11 GI Bill to be able to go to school and to provide for his family.  Eligibility for veteran's benefits to include educational benefits under the Post-9/11 or Montgomery GI Bill does not fall within the purview of the Army Discharge Review Board.  Accordingly, the applicant should contact a local office of the Department of Veterans Affairs for further assistance.

             Furthermore, the analyst determined that the applicant’s Official Military Personnel File (OMPF) does not contain all the specific documents that would indicate the reason for the separation action from the United States Army.  If the applicant desires to appear before a personal appearance Board, the burden of proof remains with the former Soldier to provide the appropriate documents or other evidence sufficient to explain the facts, circumstances, and reasons underlying the separation action, for the Board’s consideration.  
       
       Therefore, based on the available evidence, the analyst presumes government regularity in the discharge process and concludes that based on the DD Form 214, the reason for discharge and the characterization of service were both proper and equitable and recommends to the Board to deny relief.

VII.  Summary of Army Discharge Review Board Hearing

Type of Hearing: 		Date: 27 April 2011         Location: Washington, DC 

Did the Applicant Testify?  Yes     No  

Counsel: NA

Witnesses/Observers: NA
 

Exhibits Submitted: Online application, dated (100602); Letter, Chief, Congressional and Special Actions, dated (100816); Contact Sheet from SFMR-RBX-A, dated (100813); FOUO Congressional, dated (100813); House of Representatives Fax Sheet, dated (100811); Congressional Casework Authorization Form, (100810); Applicant's Letter to Congressman, dated (100810); and a DD Form 214, dated (080814).

VIII.  Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation
After carefully examining the applicant's record of service during the period of enlistment under review and considering the analyst's recommendation and rationale, the Board determined that the discharge was both proper and equitable and voted to deny relief.
        
IX.  Board Decision						
	XI.  Certification Signature
Board Vote:  							          Approval Authority:	
Character - Change 1    No change 4
Reason -     Change 0    No change 5
(Board member names available upon request)
								         EDGAR J. YANGER			 
								         Colonel, U.S. Army
X.  Board Action Directed					         President, Army Discharge Review Board
Issue a new DD Form 214  					
Change Characterization to: 			         
Change Reason to: No Change
Other: NA										
RE Code: 
Grade Restoration:   No   Yes   Grade: None


























Legend:
AWOL    	Absent Without Leave		GCM   General Court Martial	NA   Not applicable			SCM	Summary Court Martial
BCD   	Bad Conduct Discharge	GD      General Discharge	NIF   Not in the file			SPCM	Special Court Martial
CG 	Company Grade Article 15	HD      Honorable Discharge	OAD   Ordered to Active Duty		UNC	Uncharacterized Discharge  
DD 	Dishonorable Discharge	HS       High School Graduate	OMPF   Official Military Personnel File	UOTH  	Under Other Than Honorable 
FG	Field Grade Article 15		IADT   Initial Active Duty Training	RE     Reentry Code				Conditions 

ARMY DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD - CASE REPORT AND DIRECTIVE

Case Number AR20100018973
______________________________________________________________________________

Page 1 of 3 pages

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120003315

    Original file (AR20120003315.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? On 17 November 2010, the separation authority waived further rehabilitation and directed the applicant’s discharge with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. Certification Signature Approval Authority: ARCHIE L. DAVIS III Colonel, U.S. Army President, Army Discharge Review Board BONITA E. TROTMAN Lieutenant Colonel, U. S. Army Secretary Recorder Legend: AWOL Absent Without Leave GCM General Court Martial NA Not applicable SCM Summary...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | AR20110015065

    Original file (AR20110015065.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The DD Form 214, indicates the applicant was discharged under the provisions of Chapter 14, paragraph 14-12c, AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct, with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. The DD Form 214, indicates the applicant was discharged under the provisions of Chapter 14, paragraph 14-12c, AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct-serious offense, with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. Furthermore, the analyst...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | AR20110001317

    Original file (AR20110001317.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The narrative reason specified by Army Regulations for a discharge under this paragraph is "Misconduct (Drug Abuse)," the separation code is "JKK," and the reentry code is "RE 4." Therefore, based on the available evidence, the analyst presumes government regularity in the discharge process and concludes that based on the DD Form 214, the reason for discharge, the characterization of service to include the reentry eligibility (RE) code were both proper and equitable and recommends to the...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120022095

    Original file (AR20120022095.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 7 July 2010, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, paragraph 14-12c, AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct, commission of a serious offense, for willfully disobeying a commissioned officer, with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. On 26 July 2010, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed the applicant’s...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2010 | AR20100012705

    Original file (AR20100012705.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Request: Upgrade Reason Change RE Code Change Issues: The applicant states, in effect, that he would like to reenlist in the US Army and the only way he can is to have his discharge changed or upgraded from a general, under honorable conditions to an honorable discharge and any help is greatly appreciated. The DD Form 214 indicates the applicant was discharged under the provisions of Chapter 14, AR 635-200, paragraph 14-12b by reason of a pattern of misconduct, with a...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2010 | AR20100024829

    Original file (AR20100024829.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The DD Form 214 indicates the applicant was discharged under the provisions of Chapter 14, AR 635-200, paragraph 14-12b by reason of misconduct, with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. The DD Form 214 indicates the applicant was discharged under the provisions of Chapter 14, AR 635-200, paragraph 14-12b by reason of misconduct, with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2010 | AR20100025898

    Original file (AR20100025898.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 16 June 2009, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. By abusing illegal drugs, the applicant knowingly risked a military career and diminished the quality of his service below that meriting a fully honorable honorable discharge. There is no evidence in the record, nor has the applicant provided any evidence, to support his contention that the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | AR20110003980

    Original file (AR20110003980.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 10 May 2010, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, paragraph 14-12c(2), AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct, abuse of an illegal substance, possessing steroids (091001 - 100401), with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120008371

    Original file (AR20120008371.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The DD Form 214 indicates the applicant was discharged under the provisions of Chapter 14, AR 635-200, paragraph 14-12c by reason of misconduct, serious offense with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. The applicant's contentions were carefully considered, to include the self authored statement submitted by the applicant. Yes No Counsel: None Witnesses/Observers: NA Exhibits Submitted: DD Form 149 dated 11 April 2012 in lieu of a DD Form 293.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | AR20110001054

    Original file (AR20110001054.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? c. Response to Issues, Recommendation and Rationale: After a careful review of all the applicant’s available military records during the period of enlistment under review, the issues, and documents submitted with the application, the analyst found no mitigating factors which would merit an upgrade of the applicant’s discharge. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: NA Other:...