Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | DRB | CY2010 | AR20100018800
Original file (AR20100018800.txt) Auto-classification: Denied
Applicant Name:  ?????

Application Receipt Date: 2010/07/12	Prior Review:     Prior Review Date: NA     

I.  Applicant Request:  Upgrade     Reason Change     RE Code Change    

Issues: The applicant states, "I think a upgrade to honorable is justified since I served my punishment and had exemplary combat service prior to this incident.  I also feel that not all involved received the same punishment (discharge) as I did.  Also, I have not had any other offenses since my release from service and have received treatment for Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD)."   

II.  Were Proper Discharge and Separation Authority procedures followed?	     
Tender Offer:   NA

See Attachments:  Legal     Medical     Minority Opinion     Exhibits 

III.  Discharge Under Review
Unit CDR Recommended Discharge: 	   Date: 090128
Discharge Received: 			   Date: 090306   Chapter: 14-12c(2)       AR: 635-200
Reason: Misconduct (Drug Abuse)	   RE:     SPD: JKK   Unit/Location: A Co, 2-69th AR Bn, Fort Benning, GA 

Time Lost: None

Article 15s (Charges/Dates/Punishment): 081125, wrongfully used cocaine x 2 (080930), (081002); reduction to E-1, forfeiture of $674 pay x 2 month, extra duty for 45 days, and restriction for 45 days (FG).

Courts-Martial (Charges/Dates/Punishment): None

Counseling Records Available: Yes    No 

IV.  Soldier’s Overall Record
Age at current enlistment:  18
Current ENL Date: 060322    Current ENL Term: 06 Years  16 Weeks
Current ENL Service: 	02 Yrs, 11 Mos, 15 Days ?????
Total Service:  		02 Yrs, 11 Mos, 15 Days ?????
Previous Discharges: 	None
Highest Grade: E-4		Performance Ratings Available: Yes    No 
MOS: 11B10 Infantryman   GT: 119   EDU: GED   Overseas: Southwest Asia   Combat: Iraq (070311-080518)
Decorations/Awards: ARCOM, NDSM, ICM-W/CS, GWOTSM, ASR, OSR, CIB

V.  Post-Discharge Activity
City, State:  ?????
Post Service Accomplishments: None Listed 

VI.  Facts, Circumstances, and Legal Basis for Separation

       a.  Facts and Circumstances:
       The evidence of record shows that on 28 January 2009, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, paragraph 14-12c(2), AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct- commission of a serious offense for testing positive for cocaine x 3 (070301), (081002), (081020), with a general, under honorable conditions discharge.  He was advised of his rights.  
       
       On 3 February 2009, the applicant consulted with legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, and submitted a statement in his own behalf.  The unit commander subsequently recommended separation from the Army and waiver of further rehabilitative efforts.  The intermediate commander reviewed the proposed action and recommended approval of the separation with a general, under honorable conditions discharge.   
       
       On 25 February 2009, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions.

       b.  Legal Basis for Separation:  
       Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel.  Chapter 14 of this regulation establishes policy and prescribes procedures for separating members for misconduct.  Specific categories include minor disciplinary infractions, a pattern of misconduct, and commission of a serious offense, to include abuse of illegal drugs, convictions by civil authorities and desertion or absence without leave.  Action will be taken to separate a member for misconduct when it is clearly established that rehabilitation is impractical or unlikely to succeed.  Army policy states that an under other than honorable conditions discharge is normally considered appropriate, however, a general, under honorable conditions or an honorable discharge may be granted. 

       c.  Response to Issues, Recommendation and Rationale:  
       After a careful review of all the applicant’s military records during the period of enlistment under review, the issues and document submitted with the application, the analyst determined that the characterization of service is improper.  
       
       The analyst noted that the government introduced into the discharge packet the results of a command directed competence for duty (i.e., fitness for duty) biochemical test.  This is limited use information as defined in AR 600-85.  Use of this information mandates award of a fully honorable characterization of service.  
       
       Accordingly, the analyst recommends that the applicant’s characterization of service be upgraded to fully honorable.  However, the analyst found that the reason for discharge was fully supported by the record and therefore, remains both proper and equitable.

VII.  Summary of Army Discharge Review Board Hearing

Type of Hearing: 		Date: 16 March 2011         Location: Washington, DC

Did the Applicant Testify?  Yes     No  

Counsel: NA

Witnesses/Observers: NA 

Exhibits Submitted: DD Form 293, dated (100429); and a DD Form 214, dated (090306).

VIII.  Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation
After carefully examining the applicant’s record of service during the period of enlistment under review and considering the analyst’s recommendation and rationale, the Board noted that the government introduced the results of a command directed urinalysis into the discharge process.  This is limited use information as defined in AR 600-85.  Use of this information mandates award of a fully honorable discharge.  Accordingly, the Board voted to change the characterization of service to fully honorable.  However, the board found that the reason for discharge was fully supported by the record and voted not to change it.  








        
IX.  Board Decision						
	XI.  Certification Signature
Board Vote:  							          Approval Authority:	
Character - Change 5    No change 0
Reason -     Change 0    No change 5
(Board member names available upon request)
								         EDGAR J. YANGER			 
								         Colonel, U.S. Army
X.  Board Action Directed					         President, Army Discharge Review Board
Issue a new DD Form 214  					
Change Characterization to: 			         
Change Reason to: No Change
Other: NA										
RE Code: 
Grade Restoration:   No   Yes   Grade: None



































Legend:
AWOL    	Absent Without Leave		GCM   General Court Martial	NA   Not applicable			SCM	Summary Court Martial
BCD   	Bad Conduct Discharge	GD      General Discharge	NIF   Not in the file			SPCM	Special Court Martial
CG 	Company Grade Article 15	HD      Honorable Discharge	OAD   Ordered to Active Duty		UNC	Uncharacterized Discharge  
DD 	Dishonorable Discharge	HS       High School Graduate	OMPF   Official Military Personnel File	UOTH  	Under Other Than Honorable 
FG	Field Grade Article 15		IADT   Initial Active Duty Training	RE     Reentry Code				Conditions 

ARMY DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD - CASE REPORT AND DIRECTIVE

Case Number AR20100018800
______________________________________________________________________________

Page 2 of 3 pages

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2008 | AR20080010927

    Original file (AR20080010927.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 16 February 2006, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of general,under honorable conditions. However, the board determined that the reason for discharge was fully supported by the record and voted not to change it. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: No Change Other: NA RE Code: Grade...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2008 | AR20080006329

    Original file (AR20080006329.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant consulted with legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, voluntarily waived consideration of his case by an administrative separation board contingent upon him receiving a characterization of service no less favorable than honorable, and did not submit a statement in his own behalf. On 20 November 1998, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2008 | AR20080012898

    Original file (AR20080012898.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant waived consulting with legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, unconditionally waived his right to an administrative separation board, and did not submit a statement in his own behalf. On 8 January 2001, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of general under honorable conditions. Accordingly, the Board voted to change the characterization of...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2008 | AR20080008386

    Original file (AR20080008386.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant waived legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, unconditionally waived consideration of his case by an administrative separation board, and did not submit a statement in his behalf. On 4 January 2008, the separation authority approved the conditional waiver request, waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of under other than honorable conditions. Accordingly, the Board...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060013484

    Original file (AR20060013484.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Original Character of Discharge Unit CDR Recommended Discharge: Date: 011030 Discharge Received: Date: 020320 Chapter: 14-12c(2) AR: 635-200 Reason: Misconduct RE: SPD: JKK Unit/Location: B/204th Forward Support Bn, Fort Hood, TX 76544 Time Lost: AWOL 5 days (010131-010204), civilian confinement 56 days (001107-001113 and 010619-010806). On 2 November 2001, the applicant consulted with legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, and did not submit a statement in his...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2008 | AR20080005121

    Original file (AR20080005121.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant consulted with legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, waived consideration of his case by an administrative separation board, and did not submit a statement in his own behalf. On 7 March 2008, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. Accordingly, the Board voted to change the characterization of service to...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2008 | AR20080007225

    Original file (AR20080007225.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Facts and Circumstances: Evidence of record shows that on 14 November 2001, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct—commission of a serious offense/abuse of illegal drugs; in that he wrongfully used marijuana x 2 between on or about (010219-010319) and again on or about (010917-011017), with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. On 28 November 2001, the separation...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2010 | AR20100016011

    Original file (AR20100016011.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? On 30 December 2009, the separation authority approved the discharge with an under other than honorable conditions discharge. It is also noted that the characterization of service for this type of discharge is normally under other than honorable conditions and the applicant was aware of it prior to requesting discharge.

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2009 | AR20090000641

    Original file (AR20090000641.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 1 June 2001, the unit commander notified the Applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, paragraph 14-12C, AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct—for having tested positive for illegal use of marijuana on 27 February 2001 and 26 April 2001, with a general under honorable conditions discharge. The intermediate commander reviewed the proposed discharge action and recommended approval of the...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2009 | AR20090012296

    Original file (AR20090012296.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. Accordingly, the Board voted to change the characterization of service to fully honorable. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: NA Other: NA RE Code: Grade Restoration: No Yes Grade: NA Legend: AWOL Absent Without...