Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | DRB | CY2010 | AR20100018591
Original file (AR20100018591.txt) Auto-classification: Denied
Applicant Name:  ?????

Application Receipt Date: 2010/07/07	Prior Review:     Prior Review Date: NA     

I.  Applicant Request:  Upgrade     Reason Change     RE Code Change    

Issues: The applicant states, "I was diagnosed and treated for PTSD in service.  While in the service I was self medicating with drugs and alcohol.  I understand that this was wrong and regret it deeply.  I believe that if I did not have the PTSD as a result of my service in Iraq I would never have resorted to drug use to help get past my disability."

II.  Were Proper Discharge and Separation Authority procedures followed?	     
Tender Offer:   NA

See Attachments:  Legal     Medical     Minority Opinion     Exhibits 

III.  Discharge Under Review
Unit CDR Recommended Discharge: 	   Date: 090123
Discharge Received: 			   Date: 090219   Chapter: 14-12c (2)       AR: 635-200
Reason: Misconduct (Drug Abuse)	   RE:     SPD: JKK   Unit/Location: 1st Cavalry Division (Rear) (Provisional), Fort Hood, TX 

Time Lost: None

Article 15s (Charges/Dates/Punishment): 081028, wrongful use of marijuana (080803 - 080902), reduction to E-1, forfeiture of $673.00 per month for 2 months, 45 days extra duty, and an oral reprimand, (FG).

Courts-Martial (Charges/Dates/Punishment): None

Counseling Records Available: Yes    No 

IV.  Soldier’s Overall Record
Age at current enlistment:  26
Current ENL Date: 071002    Current ENL Term: 4 Years  ?????
Current ENL Service: 	1   Yrs, 4  Mos, 17 Days DD 214 does not show correct date in block 12a.
Total Service:  		6   Yrs, 0  Mos, 9   Days ?????
Previous Discharges: 	RA 030211 - 051103/HD
                                       RA 051104 - 071001/HD

Highest Grade: E-4		Performance Ratings Available: Yes    No 
MOS: 63B10 Wheeled Vehicle Mechanic   GT: 98   EDU: HS Grad   Overseas: Iraq   Combat: Iraq x 2 (040303 - 050303) and (061001 - 071101)
Decorations/Awards: AGCM, NDSM, GWOTEM, GWOTSM, ICM w/CS, ASR, OSR x 2

V.  Post-Discharge Activity
City, State:  ?????
Post Service Accomplishments: None








VI.  Facts, Circumstances, and Legal Basis for Separation

       a.  Facts and Circumstances:
       The evidence of record shows that on 23 January 2009, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, paragraph 14-12c, AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct, commission of a serious offense, for receiving an Article 15 on 6 November 2008 for the wrongful use of marijuana, with a general, under honorable conditions discharge.  He was advised of his rights.  
       
       On 26 January 2009, the applicant consulted with legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, unconditionally waived his right to an administrative separation board, and did not submit a statement in his own behalf.  The unit commander subsequently recommended separation from the Army and waiver of further rehabilitative efforts.  The intermediate commander reviewed the proposed action and recommended approval of the separation with a general, under honorable conditions discharge.  
       
       On 2 February 2009, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed the applicant’s discharge with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions.

       b.  Legal Basis for Separation:  
       Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel.  Chapter 14 of this regulation establishes policy and prescribes procedures for separating members for misconduct.  Specific categories include minor disciplinary infractions, a pattern of misconduct, and commission of a serious offense, to include abuse of illegal drugs, convictions by civil authorities and desertion or absence without leave.  Action will be taken to separate a member for misconduct when it is clearly established that rehabilitation is impractical or unlikely to succeed.  Army policy states that an under other than honorable conditions discharge is normally considered appropriate, however, a general, under honorable conditions or an honorable discharge may be granted.   

       c.  Response to Issues, Recommendation and Rationale:  
       After carefully examining the applicant’s record of service during the period of enlistment under review the issues and documents he submitted.  The analyst also considered the applicant’s diagnosis of adjustment disorder with disturbance of emotion (features of PTSD), the analyst determined that the discharge was both proper and equitable.  There was a full consideration of all faithful and honorable service as well as the infractions of discipline, the extent thereof, and the seriousness of the offenses.  
       
       In review of the applicant’s entire service record, the analyst found that his medical condition did not overcome the reason for discharge and characterization of service granted.  The record shows that on 15 October 2008 and 14 January 2009, the applicant underwent two mental evaluations which indicate that he was mentally responsible, with thought content as clear, and was able to recognize right from wrong.  The analyst concluded that just because the applicant manifested some symptoms of PTSD does not mean he doesn't know the difference between right and wrong or that he did not have control over his behavior.  There are many Soldiers with the same condition that complete their service successfully.  
       
       The analyst acknowledges the applicant's multiple successful combat tours in Iraq.  However, in review of the applicant’s entire service record, the analyst found that this did not overcome the reason for discharge and characterization of service granted.  The applicant, by violating the Army's policy not to possess or use illegal drugs, compromised the trust and confidence placed in a Soldier.  The applicant, as a Soldier, had the duty to support and abide by the Army's drug policies.  By abusing illegal drugs, the applicant knowingly risked a military career and diminished the quality of service below that meriting a fully honorable discharge.  
       
       Therefore, the analyst determined the reason for discharge and the characterization of service were both proper and equitable and recommends to the Board to deny relief. 
       
       
       
       

VII.  Summary of Army Discharge Review Board Hearing

Type of Hearing: 		Date: 4 March 2011         Location: Washington, D. C.

Did the Applicant Testify?  Yes     No  

Counsel: None

Witnesses/Observers: None 

Exhibits Submitted: DD Form 293 with a self-authored statement and a DD Form 214.

VIII.  Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation
After carefully examining the applicant’s record of service during the period of enlistment under review and considering the analyst’s recommendation and rationale, the Board determined that the discharge was both proper and equitable and voted to deny relief.  
        
IX.  Board Decision						
	XI.  Certification Signature
Board Vote:  							          Approval Authority:	
Character - Change 0    No change 5
Reason -     Change 0    No change 5
(Board member names available upon request)
								         EDGAR J. YANGER			 
								         Colonel, U.S. Army
X.  Board Action Directed					         President, Army Discharge Review Board
Issue a new DD Form 214  					
Change Characterization to: 			         
Change Reason to: No Change
Other: NA										
RE Code: 
Grade Restoration:   No   Yes   Grade: NA


















Legend:
AWOL    	Absent Without Leave		GCM   General Court Martial	NA   Not applicable			SCM	Summary Court Martial
BCD   	Bad Conduct Discharge	GD      General Discharge	NIF   Not in the file			SPCM	Special Court Martial
CG 	Company Grade Article 15	HD      Honorable Discharge	OAD   Ordered to Active Duty		UNC	Uncharacterized Discharge  
DD 	Dishonorable Discharge	HS       High School Graduate	OMPF   Official Military Personnel File	UOTH  	Under Other Than Honorable 
FG	Field Grade Article 15		IADT   Initial Active Duty Training	RE     Reentry Code				Conditions 

ARMY DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD - CASE REPORT AND DIRECTIVE

Case Number AR20100018591
______________________________________________________________________________


Page 1 of 3 pages

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2010 | AR20100008137

    Original file (AR20100008137.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The analyst acknowledges the applicant's in service accomplishments to include his service in Iraq as stated in his application. Therefore, the analyst determined the reason for discharge and the characterization of service were both proper and equitable and recommends to the Board to deny relief. Yes No Counsel: None Witnesses/Observers: NA Exhibits Submitted: CIB award letter, PTSD disability rating for the VA, PTSD diagnosis and evaluation.

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110021138

    Original file (AR20110021138.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 23 January 2009, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, paragraph 14-12c, AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct—commission of a serious offense for wrongfully using illegal drugs, receiving two Article 15s (081209, 090114) for wrongful use of marijuana, being AWOL two times (081104-081109 and 081201-081203), and failing to report two...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | AR20120006234

    Original file (AR20120006234.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? The separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. However, in review of the applicant's entire service record, the analyst found that this medical condition the applicant is claiming did not overcome the reason for discharge and the characterization of service granted.

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2010 | AR20100018232

    Original file (AR20100018232.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? Facts and Circumstances: Evidence of record shows that on 17 February 2010, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, paragraph 14-12c(2), AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct—commission of a serious offense (abuse of illegal drugs) for having in a sworn statement made to Criminal Investigation Division (CID) (090505), admitted to wrongfully distributing marijuana to various Soldiers on divers...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2008 | AR20080014113

    Original file (AR20080014113.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 12 July 2004, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct- commission of a serious offense (abuse of illegal drugs) for testing positive for wrongful use of marijuana (040525), with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2009 | AR20090001944

    Original file (AR20090001944.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? On 26 October 2005, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: No Change Other: NA RE Code: Grade Restoration: No Yes Grade: None ARMY DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD - CASE REPORT AND DIRECTIVE Case Number...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2009 | AR20090004149

    Original file (AR20090004149.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? On 30 April 2008, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of general under honorable conditions. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: NA Other: NA RE Code: Grade Restoration: No Yes Grade: NA ARMY DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD - CASE REPORT AND DIRECTIVE Case Number...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2010 | AR20100021103

    Original file (AR20100021103.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? Total Service: 3 Yrs, 3 Mos, 6 Days ????? On 8 April 2009, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed the applicant’s discharge with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions.

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2010 | AR20100012708

    Original file (AR20100012708.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? The analyst acknowledges the applicant's in service accomplishments which included a combat tour in Iraq, as stated in his application. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: NA Other: NA RE Code: Grade Restoration: No Yes Grade: NA Legend: AWOL Absent Without Leave GCM General Court Martial NA Not applicable SCM Summary Court Martial BCD Bad Conduct Discharge GD General...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2009 | AR20090018808

    Original file (AR20090018808.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 19 December 2005, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, Paragraph 14-12c(2), AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct-abuse of illegal drugs for wrongful use of phencyclidine, with an under other than honorable conditions discharge. The intermediate commander reviewed the proposed discharge action and recommended approval of the separation action with an under...