Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | DRB | CY2010 | AR20100018482
Original file (AR20100018482.txt) Auto-classification: Denied
Applicant Name:  ?????

Application Receipt Date: 2010/07/07	Prior Review:     Prior Review Date: NA     

I.  Applicant Request:  Upgrade     Reason Change     RE Code Change    

Issues: The applicant states: "Diagnosed with PTSD while in service and was not thinking correctly at the time.  I do wish that I could take back time.  Even though things did not turn out the way I wanted.  I still contend that I was a good Soldier and that PTSD contributed largely to the outcome.  I would hope that you may be able to read through the lines; and thru my situation around.  I would be grateful!"

II.  Were Proper Discharge and Separation Authority procedures followed?	     
Tender Offer:   NA

See Attachments:  Legal     Medical     Minority Opinion     Exhibits 

III.  Discharge Under Review
Unit CDR Recommended Discharge: 	   Date: NIF
Discharge Received: 			   Date: 080602   Chapter: 10       AR: 635-200
Reason: In Lieu of Trial by Court-Martial	   RE:     SPD: KFS   Unit/Location: 63d Eng Co, Fort Benning, GA 

Time Lost: AWOL x 2 for a total of 30 days: 1 day (080403-080404), surrendered;  29 days (080417-080507), surrendered.  The DD Form 214 under review does not show that the applicant also when went AWOL (071225-080125) for a total of 32 days.

Article 15s (Charges/Dates/Punishment): 080109, Falsely altering a Sick Slip (071030), reduction to E2; forfeiture of $150.00 for two months; extra duty for 45 days; and restriction for 45 days, (FG).

Courts-Martial (Charges/Dates/Punishment): None

Counseling Records Available: Yes    No 

IV.  Soldier’s Overall Record
Age at current enlistment:  21
Current ENL Date: 030410    Current ENL Term: 04 Years  ?????
Current ENL Service: 	05 Yrs, 00 Mos, 25 Days ?????
Total Service:  		05 Yrs, 00 Mos, 25 Days ?????
Previous Discharges: 	None
Highest Grade: E4		Performance Ratings Available: Yes    No 
MOS: 21E10/HVY Const Equip Oper   GT: 102   EDU: HS Grad   Overseas: Southwest Asia (2)   Combat: Iraq (031023-040128) and (050128-060107)
Decorations/Awards: ARCOM, AAM, AGCM, NDSM, GWOTEM, GWOTSM, ICM-w/CS, ASR, OSR

V.  Post-Discharge Activity
City, State:  ?????
Post Service Accomplishments: None Listed









VI.  Facts, Circumstances, and Legal Basis for Separation

       a.  Facts and Circumstances:
       The evidence of record shows that on 12 May 2007 (12 May 2008), the applicant was charged with going AWOL x 2 (080403-080404, and 080417-080508) and wrongful use of cocaine between (071225-080125).
       
       On 14 May 2008, the applicant consulted with legal counsel and voluntarily requested, in writing, discharge under the provisions of Chapter 10, AR 635-200 in lieu of trial by court-martial.  In this request, the applicant admitted guilt to the offense, or a lesser included offense.  Further, the applicant indicated he understood that he could receive an under other than honorable conditions discharge and that the discharge would have a significant effect on eligibility for veteran’s benefits.  The applicant did not submit  a statement in his own behalf.  The applicant's chain of command recommended approval of the Chapter 10 request with an under other than honorable conditions discharge.  
       
       On 21 May 2008, the separation authority approved the Chapter 10 request and directed the discharge with a characterization of service of under other than honorable conditions.  The applicant was to be reduced to the lowest enlisted rank. 

       b.  Legal Basis for Separation:  
       Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel.  Chapter 10 of that regulation provides, in pertinent part, that a member who has committed an offense or offenses for which the authorized punishment includes a punitive discharge may submit a request for a discharge for the good of the Service in lieu of trial by court-martial.  The request may be submitted at any time after charges have been preferred and must include the individual’s admission of guilt.  Army policy states that although an honorable or general, under honorable conditions discharge is authorized, a discharge under other than honorable conditions is normally considered appropriate.

       c.  Response to Issues, Recommendation and Rationale:  
       After a careful review of all the applicant’s military records during the period of enlistment under review, the issues, and documents submitted with the application, the analyst found no mitigating factors which would merit an upgrade of the applicant's discharge.  
       
       The evidence of record shows the applicant was charged with the commission of an offense punishable under the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ) with a punitive discharge.  The applicant consulted with defense counsel, and voluntarily in writing, requested separation from the Army in lieu of trial by court-martial.  In doing so, the applicant admitted guilt to the stipulated or lesser-included offenses under the UCMJ.  
       
       The analyst noted that all the requirements of law and regulation were met and the rights of the applicant were fully protected throughout the separation process.  It is also noted that the characterization of service for this type of discharge is normally under other than honorable conditions and the applicant was aware of it prior to requesting discharge.  
       
       The applicant contends that he was diagnosed with Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) while in service and was not thinking correctly at the time of discharge, was being evaluated for a medical discharge because of his back, and that he started using drugs because of pressure of having to go back to Iraq and issues with wife.  The analyst acknowledges the documents submitted with the application indicating PTSD and pending MEB for back problems, however, the analyst concluded that just because the applicant suffers from PTSD or was pending a MEB does not mean he doesn't know the difference between right and wrong or that he did not have control over his behavior.  There are many Soldiers with the same condition that complete their service successfully.  
       
       
       
       
       
       
       Furthermore, the analyst determined that the applicant had many legitimate avenues through which to obtain assistance or relief, without committing the misconduct, which led to the separation action under review.
       
       In view of the foregoing, the analyst determined thatn the reason for discharge and the characterization of service were both proper and equitable and recommends to the Board to deny relief. 

VII.  Summary of Army Discharge Review Board Hearing

Type of Hearing: 		Date: 23 March 2011         Location: Washington, DC

Did the Applicant Testify?  Yes     No  

Counsel: None

Witnesses/Observers: NA 

Exhibits Submitted: DD Form 293, self-authored letter (3 pages), Psychiatric Evaluation (4 pages), Chronological Record of Medical Care (7 pages), and DD Form 214 for the period of service under review.

VIII.  Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation
After carefully examining the applicant’s record of service during the period of enlistment under review and considering the analyst’s recommendation and rationale, the Board determined that the discharge was both proper and equitable, and voted to deny relief.
        
IX.  Board Decision						
	XI.  Certification Signature
Board Vote:  							          Approval Authority:	
Character - Change 0    No change 5
Reason -     Change 0    No change 5
(Board member names available upon request)
								         EDGAR J. YANGER			 
								         Colonel, U.S. Army
X.  Board Action Directed					         President, Army Discharge Review Board
Issue a new DD Form 214  					
Change Characterization to: 			         
Change Reason to: NA
Other: NA										
RE Code: 
Grade Restoration:   No   Yes   Grade: NA











Legend:
AWOL    	Absent Without Leave		GCM   General Court Martial	NA   Not applicable			SCM	Summary Court Martial
BCD   	Bad Conduct Discharge	GD      General Discharge	NIF   Not in the file			SPCM	Special Court Martial
CG 	Company Grade Article 15	HD      Honorable Discharge	OAD   Ordered to Active Duty		UNC	Uncharacterized Discharge  
DD 	Dishonorable Discharge	HS       High School Graduate	OMPF   Official Military Personnel File	UOTH  	Under Other Than Honorable 
FG	Field Grade Article 15		IADT   Initial Active Duty Training	RE     Reentry Code				Conditions 

ARMY DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD - CASE REPORT AND DIRECTIVE

Case Number AR20100018482
______________________________________________________________________________


Page 3 of 3 pages

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2009 | AR20090003786

    Original file (AR20090003786.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation After carefully examining the applicant’s record of service during the period of enlistment under review and considering the analyst’s recommendation and rationale, the Board determined that the discharge was both proper and equitable and voted to deny relief. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: No Change Other: NA RE...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2010 | AR20100011023

    Original file (AR20100011023.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? Legal Basis for Separation: Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel. It is also noted that the characterization of service for this type of discharge is normally under other than honorable conditions and the applicant was aware of it prior to requesting discharge.

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2009 | AR20090006647

    Original file (AR20090006647.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? The separation authority subsequently approved the Chapter 10 request with an under other than honorable conditions discharge. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: No Change Other: NA RE Code: Grade Restoration: No Yes Grade: NA ARMY DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD - CASE REPORT AND DIRECTIVE Case Number...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2009 | AR20090004108

    Original file (AR20090004108.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 11 April 2008, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, paragraph 12c(2), AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct serious offense for abuse of illegal drugs with an under other than honorable conditions discharge. The applicant consulted with legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action unconditionally waived her right...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2008 | AR20080009255

    Original file (AR20080009255.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation After carefully examining the applicant’s record of service during the period of enlistment under review and considering the analyst’s recommendation and rationale, the Board determined that the discharge was both proper and equitable, and voted to deny relief. Certification Signature Board Vote: Approval Authority: Character - Change 2 No change 3 Reason - Change 0 No change 5 (Board member names available upon...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2010 | AR20100008968

    Original file (AR20100008968.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    It is also noted that the characterization of service for this type of discharge is normally under other than honorable conditions and that the applicant was aware of that prior to requesting discharge. Yes No Counsel: [ redacted ] Witnesses/Observers: NA Exhibits Submitted: DD Form 293, Medical Records (129 pages), and DD Form 214 for the period of service under review. Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation After carefully examining the applicant’s record of service during...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2009 | AR20090013725

    Original file (AR20090013725.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 3 June 2008, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, Paragraph 14-12c, AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct-commission of a serious offense for wrongful use of marijuana (080125-080224), and dereliction of duty (080225), with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. The narrative reason specified by Army Regulations for a discharge under this...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110005851

    Original file (AR20110005851.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? The analyst carefully examined the applicant's record of service during the period of enlistment under review. Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation After carefully examining the applicant’s record of service during the period of enlistment under review and considering the analyst’s recommendation and rationale, the Board determined that the discharge was both proper and equitable and voted to deny relief.

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2009 | AR20090009064

    Original file (AR20090009064.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? Applicant Request: Upgrade Reason Change RE Code Change Issues: See DD Form 293 submitted by the applicant. On 17 April 2008, the separation authority approved the discharge with an under other than honorable conditions discharge.

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2010 | AR20100011403

    Original file (AR20100011403.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? On 18 July 2008, the separation authority approved the discharge with a characterization of service of under other than honorable conditions. It is also noted that the characterization of service for this type of discharge is normally under other than honorable conditions and the applicant was aware of it prior to requesting discharge.