Applicant Name: ?????
Application Receipt Date: 2010/07/19 Prior Review: Prior Review Date: NA
I. Applicant Request: Upgrade Reason Change RE Code Change
Issues: The applicant states "At the time of discharge I was given the information necessary to recover from the unnecessary drama that the discharge originated from to pursue higher education and that with my status I would be capable of doing so. When returned a copy of my paperwork for my records I found that it was changed to a lesser status. Being that the unit would not allow me to go anywhere without escort and were rushing to get me out, I was unable to get this error corrected."
II. Were Proper Discharge and Separation Authority procedures followed?
Tender Offer: NA
See Attachments: Legal Medical Minority Opinion Exhibits
III. Discharge Under Review
Unit CDR Recommended Discharge: Date: 080211
Discharge Received: Date: 080307 Chapter: 14-12c (1) AR: 635-200
Reason: Misconduct (AWOL) RE: SPD: JKD Unit/Location: Echo Troop, 7th Squadron, 17th Cavalry Regiment, Fort Campbell, KY
Time Lost: AWOL x 1 from (071204-071222) for 19 days. The applicant was apprehended by the civilian authorities and placed in civil confinement from (071223-080108) for 16 days. The applicant returned to his unit.
Article 15s (Charges/Dates/Punishment): 070717, failed to go to his appointed place of duty x 2 (070626), (070626), reduction to Private (E-2), suspended, forfeiture of $729.00 pay per month for 2 months, suspended, to be automatically remitted unless vacated before (071009), extra duty and restriction for 45 days (FG)
The suspension of the punishment of reduction to Private (E-2) imposed on (070717) was vacated, effective (070822) based on the applicant's offense of failing to go to his appointed place of duty (070808).
Courts-Martial (Charges/Dates/Punishment): None
Counseling Records Available: Yes No
IV. Soldiers Overall Record
Age at current enlistment: 21
Current ENL Date: 051115 Current ENL Term: 4 Years ?????
Current ENL Service: 2 Yrs, 2 Mos, 19 Days ?????
Total Service: 2 Yrs, 2 Mos, 19 Days ?????
Previous Discharges: None
Highest Grade: E-3 Performance Ratings Available: Yes No
MOS: 94F10 Spcl Electr Dev Repairer GT: 116 EDU: GED Cert Overseas: None Combat: None
Decorations/Awards: NDSM, GWOTSM, ASR
V. Post-Discharge Activity
City, State: ?????
Post Service Accomplishments: None submitted by the applicant.
VI. Facts, Circumstances, and Legal Basis for Separation
a. Facts and Circumstances:
The evidence of record shows that on 11 February 2008, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14-12c (1), AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct-commission of a serious offense; in that he went AWOL from (071204-071222), and was placed in civilian confinement from (071223-080108), with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. He was advised of his rights. On 21 February 2008, the applicant consulted with legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, and did not submit a statement in his own behalf. The unit commander subsequently recommended separation from the service and waiver of further rehabilitative efforts. The intermediate commander reviewed the proposed discharge action and recommended approval of the separation action with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. On 29 February 2008, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions.
b. Legal Basis for Separation:
Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel. Chapter 14 of this regulation establishes policy and prescribes procedures for separating members for misconduct. Specific categories include minor disciplinary infractions, a pattern of misconduct, and commission of a serious offense, to include abuse of illegal drugs, convictions by civil authorities and desertion or absence without leave. Action will be taken to separate a member for misconduct when it is clearly established that rehabilitation is impractical or unlikely to succeed. Army policy states that an under other than honorable conditions discharge is normally considered appropriate, however, a general, under honorable conditions or an honorable discharge may be granted.
c. Response to Issues, Recommendation and Rationale:
After a careful review of all the applicants military records, and the issue and documents submitted with the application, the analyst found no mitigating factors which would merit an upgrade of the applicant's discharge.
The analyst determined that the applicants discharge was appropriate because the quality of his service was not consistent with the Army's standards for acceptable personal conduct and performance of duty by military personnel. By the misconduct, the applicant diminished the quality of his service below that meriting a fully honorable discharge.
The applicant provided no independent corroborating evidence demonstrating that either the command's action was erroneous or that the applicants service mitigated the misconduct or poor duty performance.
The analyst noted the applicant's issue that he is trying to pursue higher education and that with his status, he would be capable of doing so. When he returned a copy of his paperwork for his records, he found that it was changed to a lesser status, being that the unit would not allow him to go anywhere without an escort and were rushing to get him out, he was unable to get this error corrected. The analyst found no evidence of arbitrary or capricious actions by the command. The analyst was satisfied that all requirements of law and regulation were met and the rights of the applicant were fully protected throughout the separation process.
Further, eligibility for veteran's benefits to include educational benefits under the Post-9/11 or Montgomery GI Bill does not fall within the purview of the Army Discharge Review Board. Accordingly, the applicant should contact a local office of the Department of Veterans Affairs for further assistance.
Therefore, the analyst determined that the reason for discharge and the characterization of service were both proper and equitable and recommends to the Board to deny relief.
VII. Summary of Army Discharge Review Board Hearing
Type of Hearing: Date: 6 April 2011 Location: Washington, DC
Did the Applicant Testify? Yes No
Counsel: None
Witnesses/Observers: NA
Exhibits Submitted: Online application dated 12 July 2010, Legal Action Request Form undated, DD Form 214 for the period of service ending 7 March 2008.
VIII. Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation
After carefully examining the applicants record of service during the period of enlistment under review and considering the analysts recommendation and rationale, the Board determined that the discharge was both proper and equitable and voted to deny relief.
IX. Board Decision
XI. Certification Signature
Board Vote: Approval Authority:
Character - Change 0 No change 5
Reason - Change 0 No change 5
(Board member names available upon request)
EDGAR J. YANGER
Colonel, U.S. Army
X. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board
Issue a new DD Form 214
Change Characterization to:
Change Reason to: No Change
Other: No Change
RE Code:
Grade Restoration: No Yes Grade: No Change
Legend:
AWOL Absent Without Leave GCM General Court Martial NA Not applicable SCM Summary Court Martial
BCD Bad Conduct Discharge GD General Discharge NIF Not in the file SPCM Special Court Martial
CG Company Grade Article 15 HD Honorable Discharge OAD Ordered to Active Duty UNC Uncharacterized Discharge
DD Dishonorable Discharge HS High School Graduate OMPF Official Military Personnel File UOTH Under Other Than Honorable
FG Field Grade Article 15 IADT Initial Active Duty Training RE Reentry Code Conditions
ARMY DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD - CASE REPORT AND DIRECTIVE
Case Number AR20100018336
______________________________________________________________________________
Page 1 of 3 pages
ARMY | DRB | CY2009 | AR20090010670
On 24 January 2008, the applicant consulted with legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, unconditionally waived his right to an administrative separation board, and did not submit a statement in his own behalf. On 27 June 2008, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of under other than honorable conditions. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review...
ARMY | DRB | CY2009 | AR20090016407
Applicant Name: ????? Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 21 February 2008, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14-12c, AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct-commission of a serious offense; in that he wrongfully used cocaine between 071210-071212; AWOL between 071218-080104; wrongfully consumed alcohol while under 21 years of age; on divers occasions failed to go to his appointed place of duty...
ARMY | DRB | CY2008 | AR20080013936
Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 21 December 2007, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, paragraph 14-12c, AR 635-200, by reason of misconductfor commission of serious offense for failure to report on divers occasions, for being AWOL (070607-070621), and for being disrespectful and disobeying a lawful order from a non-commissioned officer, with a general under honorable conditions...
ARMY | DRB | CY2008 | AR20080014153
Applicant Name: ????? Having examined the above documentation, the analyst determined that the applicant's discharge was not the result of any medical condition and that he was administratively discharged under the provisions of Chapter 14, AR 635-200 by reason of misconduct- pattern of misconduct. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: NA Other: NA RE Code: Grade Restoration: No Yes Grade: NA ARMY...
ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120003123
Applicant Name: ????? On 26 May 2009, the separation authority waived further rehabilitation and directed the applicants discharge with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. Legal Basis for Separation: Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel.
ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110014647
On 23 September 2008, the applicant consulted with legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, and did not submit a statement in his own behalf. On 3 October 2008, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. Accordingly, the analyst recommends to the board that the applicants characterization of service be upgraded to fully honorable.
ARMY | DRB | CY2009 | AR20090018908
Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 17 April 2008, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14-12c, AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct-commission of a serious offense; in that he was convicted by a Summary Court-Martial on (080417) for being AWOL from (071222-080123), and on (070825), he received a Field Grade Article 15 for being AWOL from (070713-070820), with a general, under honorable...
ARMY | DRB | CY2008 | AR20080002730
Applicant Name: ????? Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 5 September 2007, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, AR 635-200, by reason of misconducton 1 August 2007, received a Field Grade Article 15 for being AWOL, violating a lawful general order and assault, with a general under honorable conditions discharge. On 13 September 2007, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative...
ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070015600
Applicant Name: ????? Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 15 July 2007, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct-pattern of misconduct for failure to report numerous times, disobeyed NCOs numerous times, communicated a threat, dereliction of duty, conspired to commit larceny and committed larceny, with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. On 24...
ARMY | DRB | CY2010 | AR20100023469
Applicant Name: ????? On 28 November 2007, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, paragraph 14-9, Section II, AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct- conviction by a civil court in a foreign country, with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. c. Response to Issues, Recommendation and Rationale: After a careful review of all the applicants military records, the issue and document submitted with the...